Advertisement

Preparing Young Researchers in Mathematics Education: Beyond Simple Supervising

  • Mariam HaspekianEmail author
  • Rudolf Straesser
  • Ferdinando Arzarello
Chapter

Abstract

The mentoring of doctoral students towards research in mathematics education is seldom considered in scientific debates. The Artigue Colloquium provided an opportunity both for paying tribute to Michèle Artigue’s work as a supervisor of young researchers, and for engaging in a debate about this specific, complex, but crucial, mission of researchers. This chapter, beyond highlighting outcomes of the session held at the Colloquium, offers an entry into a more general reflection on the preparation of young researchers in mathematics education.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to Uffe Thomas Jankvist and Avenilde Romo-Vazquez. Special thanks go to Bernard Hodgson—this text would have never been written without his appropriate and gentle push to actually write it.

References

  1. European Commission’s Expert Group on Gender and Employment Issues (EGGE). (2009). The provision of childcare services. A comparative review of 30 European countries. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  2. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, New York, Oakleigh: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Liljedahl, P., Williams, G., et al. (2013). Education of young mathematics education researchers. In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 71–92). Kiel, Germany: PME.Google Scholar
  4. McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (Eds.). (2011). Doctoral education: Research based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2012). Challenging the taken-for-granted: How research analysis might inform pedagogical practices and institutional policy related to doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 37(6), 683–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mills, M., Präg, P., et al. (2014). Member states and progress towards the Barcelona targets. Short Statistical Report No. 1. E. Commission, European Commission—European Union Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity—Progress (2007–2013)—Rand Europe. Accessed on April 11, 2015 http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/documents/140502_gender_equality_workforce_ssr1_en.pdf
  7. Pyhältö, K., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Reys, R. E., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.). (2001). One field, many paths: U.S. Doctoral Programs in Mathematics Education. Providence, Rhode Island/Washington, D.C.: American Mathematical Society in Cooperation with the Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  9. Stubb, J. (2012). Becoming a Scholar (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki). Available online at: https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/32807/Becoming.pdf?sequence=1

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariam Haspekian
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rudolf Straesser
    • 2
  • Ferdinando Arzarello
    • 3
  1. 1.Université Paris Descartes—Sorbonne Paris CitéParisFrance
  2. 2.Justus-Liebig-Universität GiessenGiessenGermany
  3. 3.Università di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations