Breast Reconstruction

  • Edward H. Davidson
  • Vu T. Nguyen
  • Kenneth C. Shestak
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Breast reconstruction provides closure to many women who have been treated for breast cancer by increasing their comfort in clothing and providing a psychological benefit. The role of the plastic surgeon is to guide the patient through the decision tree to select a reconstructive pathway that is safe and meets expectations. Patients who choose reconstruction must navigate a reconstructive pathway guided by their plastic surgeons that includes decisions regarding the timing, type, and extent of reconstruction. The gold standard for breast cancer care includes an integrated multidisciplinary team approach comprising surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, oncology nurses, and plastic surgeons.

Keywords

Breast reconstruction Tissue expansion Implant-based reconstruction Latissimus flap Free flap Fat grafting Nipple reconstruction 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Goin MK, Goin JM. Midlife reactions to mastectomy and subsequent breast reconstruction. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38(2):225–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little 3rd JW. Psychosocial correlates of immediate versus delayed reconstruction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76(5):713–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gieni M, Avram R, Dickson L, Farrokhyar F, Lovrics P, Faidi S, et al. Local breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast. 2012;21(3):230–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mustonen P, Lepistö J, Papp A, Berg M, Pietiläinen T, Kataja V, et al. The surgical and oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30(8):817–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krumboeck A, Giovanoli P, Plock JA. Fat grafting and stem cell enhanced fat grafting to the breast under oncological aspects – recommendations for patient selection. Breast. 2013;22(5):579–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ihrai T, Georgiou C, Machiavello JC, Chignon-Sicard B, Figl A, Raoust I, et al. Autologous fat grafting and breast cancer recurrences: retrospective analysis of a series of 100 procedures in 64 patients. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47(4):273–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, Diaz Z, Robertson Y, Korourian S, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(4):686–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mallon P, Feron JG, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Lemasurier P, Guihard T, et al. The role of nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):969–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Agrawal A, Sibbering DM, Courtney CA. Skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(4):320–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, Clough KB, Sarfati I, Ihrai T, Rietjens M, et al. The oncologic outcome and immediate surgical complications of lipofilling in breast cancer patients: a multicenter study – Milan-Paris-Lyon experience of 646 lipofilling procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(2):341–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Silicone breast implants and magnetic resonance imaging screening for rupture: do U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommendations reflect an evidence-based practice approach to patient care? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(4):1127–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK. Silicone breast implants and connective tissue disease: an updated review of the epidemiologic evidence. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:598.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK. Breast implants and fibromyalgia: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rohrich RJ. Safety of silicone breast implants: scientific validation/vindication at last. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1786.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hulka BS, Kerkvliet NL, Tugwell P. Experience of a scientific panel formed to advise the federal judiciary on silicone breast implants. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:812.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tugwell P, Wells G, Peterson J, Welch V, Page J, Davison C, et al. Do silicone breast implants cause rheumatologic disorders? A systematic review for a court-appointed national science panel. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2000;44:2477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al-Sabounchi S, De Mey AM, Eder H. Textured saline-filled breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty: does overfilling prevent deflation? A long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(1):215–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dowden RV. Breast implant overfill, optimal fill, and the standard of care. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(4):1185–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, Mc-Cormick B, VanZee K. Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction in 156 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:877–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Restifo RJ, Ward BA, Scoutt LM, Brown JM. Timing, magnitude, and utility of surgical delay in the TRAM flap: II. Clinical studies. Plastic and reconstructive. Surgery. 1997;99(4):1217–23.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shestak KC, Johnson RR, Greco RJ, Williams SW. Partial mastectomy and breast reduction as a valuable treatment option for patients with macromastia and carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;177:54–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A, Peters S, Shestak A, Kim J. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(3):780–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shestak KC, Nguyen TD. The double opposing periareola flap: a novel concept for nipple areola reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(2):473–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khouri R, Del Vecchio D. Breast reconstruction and augmentation using pre-expansion and autologous fat transplantation. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36(2):269–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward H. Davidson
    • 1
  • Vu T. Nguyen
    • 1
  • Kenneth C. Shestak
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations