Advertisement

Lighten Up! — An Ambient Light Progress Bar Using Individually Controllable LEDs

  • Heiko Müller
  • Anastasia Kazakova
  • Wilko Heuten
  • Susanne Boll
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9425)

Abstract

Ambient light displays can be used to convey information to office workers in the periphery of their attention without cluttering their computer monitor or distracting users from their primary task. In this paper we report on a user study evaluating “Lighten Up”, an ambient light display to give information about secondary task progress over time. We explored the design space with 42 light patterns. We chose two for a study comparing Lighten Up against a state-of-the-art on-screen progress bar. Our results suggest that users prefer Lighten Up over the on-screen display, if the ambient light display uses a stepwise increase in illumination. Increasing brightness in steps gives users a sense of rhythm and helps them keep track of the progress from the corner of their eye.

Keywords

Design Space Primary Task Secondary Task Light Pattern Vertical Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Adamczyk, P.D., Bailey, B.P.: If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. In: Proceedings of CHI 2004, CHI 2004, pp. 271–278. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2004). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985692.985727
  2. 2.
    Brewster, S.A., King, A.: The design and evaluation of a vibrotactile progress bar. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, WHC 2005, pp. 499–500 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crease, M., Brewster, S.A.: Making progress with sounds-the design and evaluation of an audio progress bar. In: Proceedings of ICAD 1998 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., Wilhite, S.: A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In: Proceedings of CHI 2004, CHI 2004, pp. 175–182. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2004). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985692.985715
  5. 5.
    Fogarty, J., Hudson, S.E., Atkeson, C.G., Avrahami, D., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Lee, J.C., Yang, J.: Predicting human interruptibility with sensors. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 12(1), 119–146 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harrison, C., Yeo, Z., Hudson, S.E.: Faster progress bars: manipulating perceived duration with visual augmentations. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2010, pp. 1545–1548 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hart, S.: Nasa-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 50, 904–908 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hertzum, M., Holmegaard, K.D.: Perceived time as a measure of mental workload: effects of time constraints and task success. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Inter. 29(1), 26–39 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.676538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ishii, H., Wisneski, C., Brave, S., Dahley, A., Gorbet, M., Ulmer, B., Yarin, P.: Ambientroom: integrating ambient media with architectural space. In: Proceedings of CHI 1998 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leibowitz, H.W., Shupert, C.L., Post, R.B.: The two modes of visual processing: implications for spatial orientation. In: Peripheral Vision Horizon Display (PVHD) (1984)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liikkanen, L.A., Gómez, P.G.: Designing interactive systems for the experience of time. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, DPPI 2013, pp. 146–155 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mark, G., Gonzalez, V.M., Harris, J.: No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work. In: Proceedings of CHI 2005, CHI 2005, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matthews, T., Dey, A.K., Mankoff, J., Carter, S., Rattenbury, T.: A toolkit for managing user attention in peripheral displays. In: Proceedings of UIST (2004). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1029632.1029676
  14. 14.
    Moraveji, N., Soesanto, C.: Towards stress-less user interfaces: 10 design heuristics based on the psychophysiology of stress. In: CHI 2012 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2012, pp. 1643–1648 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Müller, H., Kazakova, A., Pielot, M., Heuten, W., Boll, S.: Ambient timer – unobtrusively reminding users of upcoming tasks with ambient light. In: Winckler, M. (ed.) INTERACT 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8117, pp. 211–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ostendorp, M.C., Harre, A., Jacob, S., Mller, H., Heuten, W., Boll, S.: Ambient progress bar - relaxed and efficient work in waiting periods. In: Mensch & Computer 2013: Interaktive Vielfalt, pp. 221–229 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peres, S., Kortum, P., Stallmann, K.: Auditory progress bars: preference, performance and aesthetics. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2007) (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sokolov, E.: Higher nervous functions: the orienting reflex. Annu. Revs. Physiol. 25, 545–580 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weiser, M., Brown, J.S.: Designing calm technology. Powergrid Journal 1, 75–85 (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wickens, C.D.: Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heiko Müller
    • 1
  • Anastasia Kazakova
    • 2
  • Wilko Heuten
    • 1
  • Susanne Boll
    • 2
  1. 1.OFFIS - Institute for Information TechnologyOldenburgGermany
  2. 2.University of OldenburgOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations