Towards a Generic Goal Model to Support Continuous Improvement in SME Construction Companies

  • Anne PerssonEmail author
  • Anniken Karlsen
  • Kristens Gudfinnsson
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 235)


Small and medium sized (SME) construction companies are often good at bricks, mortar and carpentry but not at management. However, it is often bad management that hinders companies to become financially sustainable over time and to grow. This paper presents a generic goal model aiming to support SME construction companies to systematically work with continuous improvement towards the overarching goal of becoming thriving businesses. The goal model has been developed based on the principles of lean, balanced scorecards and the business canvas, as well as on a management consultant’s experiences from working with this kind of companies for many years.


Goal model Enterprise modeling Continuous improvement SME construction companies 


  1. 1.
    European Commission: Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (2013) [Online]Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith, N.J., Merna, T., Jobling, P.: Managing Risk in Construction Projects. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Love, P.E.D., Irani, Z.: An exploratory study of information technology evaluation and benefits management practices of SMEs in the construction sector. Inf. Manag. 42, 227–242 (2004). ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Olawale, Y., Sun, M.: Cost and time control of construction projects: Inhibiting factors and mitigating measures in practice. Constr. Manag. Econ. 28(5), 509–526 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morris, P., Pinto, J.: The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects. John Wiley, Hoboken (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aarseth, W.: Project Management - A New Mindset for Success. Collaborative Business and Global Mindset. Fagbokforlaget, Trondheim (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hernández, C., Pajares, J., López-Paredes, A.: A portfolio inspired metric for project selection in construction management. Organ. Technol. Manag. Constr. Int. J. 3(1), 264 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bhasin, S.: An appropriate change strategy for lean success. Manag. Decis. 50, 439–458 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ogunbiyi, O., Oladapo, A., Goulding, J.: An empirical study of the impact of leanconstruction techniques on sustainable construction in the UK. Constr. Innov. 14(1), 88–107 (2013). Permanent link to the document: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghobadian, A., Gallear, D.N.: Total quality management in SMEs. Omega 24, 83–106 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brundin, E., Florin Samuelsson, E., Melin, L.: The Family Ownership Logic: Core Characteristics of Family-Controlled Businesses. CeFEO Working Paper 2008:1 Jönköping: Center for Family Enterprise and Ownership, Jönköping International Business School (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kraus, S., Harms, R., Fing, M.: Family firm research: sketching a research field. Int. J. Entrepreneurship Innov. Manag. 13(1), 32–47 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bill, F., Johannisson, B., Olaison, L.: The incubus paradox: attempts at foundational rethinking of the “SME support genre”. Eur. Plan. Stud. 17(8), 1135–1152 (2009). doi: 10.1080/09654310902980997 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Achanga, P., Shehab, E., Roy, R., Nelder, G.: Critical success factors for lean implementation within SMEs. J. Manufact. Technol. Manag. 17, 460–471 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alaskari, O., Ahmad, M., Dhafr, N., Pinedo-Cuenca, R.: Critical successful factors (CSFs) for Successful implementation of Lean tools and ERP systems. In: World Congress on Engineering WCE 2012. International Association of Engineers, London (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davenport, T., Short, J.: The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Manag. Rev. 31(4), 11–27 (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ukko, J., Karhu, J., Rantanen, H.: How to communicate target information in SMEs? In: Malmberg, P. (ed.) European Productivity Conference. Finland (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Drucker, P.F.: The Practice of Management, Harper Business; Reissue edition 3 October 2006Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Overbeek, S., Frank, U., Köhling, C.: A language for multi-perspective goal modeling: Challenges, requirements and solutions. Computer Standards & Interfaces 38, 1–16 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wißotzki, M.: Enterprise Modeling: Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. The Enterprise Engineering Series, Kindle edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Sci. Comput. Program. 20(1–2), 3–50 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu, Eric S.K.: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirement engineering. In: IEEE International Symposium Requirements Engineering, pp. 226–235 (1997)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rolland, C.: Capturing system intentionality with maps. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Brinkkemper, S. (eds.) Conceptual Modelling in Information Systems Engineering, pp. 141–158. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ullah, A., Lai, R.: Modeling business goal for business/IT alignment using requirements engineering. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 51(3), 21–28 (2011). SpringerGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stirna, J., Persson, A.: Purpose Driven Competency Planning for Enterprise Modeling Projects. In: Ralyté, J., Franch, X., Brinkkemper, S., Wrycza, S. (eds.) CAiSE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7328, pp. 662–677. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Karlsen, A., Opdahl, A.L.: Enterprise Modeling Practice in a Turnaround Project. In: Fallmyr, T. (ed.) Norsk Konferanse for Organisasjoners Bruk Av Informasjonsteknologi, pp. 199–212. NOKOBIT-stiftelsen og Akademika forlag, Trondheim (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liker, J., och Morgan, J.M.: The toyota way in services: the case of lean product development. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 20, 5–20 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schneiderman, Arthur M. (2006). “Analog Devices: 1986–1992, The First Balanced Scorecard”. Arthur M. Schneiderman. Archived from the original on 25 December 2013. Accessed 28 May 2014Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Osterwalder, A.: The Business Model Ontology - A Proposition in A Design Science Approach. Ph.D. thesis University of Lausanne (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cawsey, T.F., Deszca, G., Ingols, C.: Organizational Change – An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Karlsen, A., Persson, A., Gudfinnsson, K., Hauge, V., Lande, M. and Tellnes, O.: Towards a Tool to Support Goal Oriented Continuous Improvement in SME Construction Companies. In: PoEM Conference (2015, submitted)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Persson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anniken Karlsen
    • 2
  • Kristens Gudfinnsson
    • 1
  1. 1.School of InformaticsUniversity of SkövdeSkövdeSweden
  2. 2.Aalesund University CollegeAalesundNorway

Personalised recommendations