Vulnerability Is Dynamic! Conceptualising a Dynamic Approach to Coastal Tourism Destinations’ Vulnerability

Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)


Coastal regions and islands are among the most popular tourist destinations. They are also highly vulnerable to climate change. Much of the literature on vulnerability, including IPCC reports, states that vulnerability is dynamic. However, vulnerability conceptualisations in the tourism realm have so far taken a static perspective. Static conceptualisation underestimates inherent uncertainties stemming from actor interactions (with one another and their environment) and processes. The interactions and processes are important for developing adaptive strategies in a dynamic world. Hence, frameworks for analysing tourism vulnerability as a dynamic phenomenon are urgently needed. This paper outlines the first steps taken towards a dynamic approach for analysing vulnerability of Caribbean coastal tourism. The approach consists of (1) a conceptual framework focusing on human-human and human-environment interactions at the actor level and (2) an evolutionary methodology. The methodology engages both Caribbean climate change experts and regional actors. Regional actors both respond to and help develop the framework through interactive, or companion, modelling. By focusing on interactions and processes, the approach is expected to yield key insights into the development of vulnerability through time, crucial information for adaptive management.


Dynamic vulnerability approach Companion modelling Agent-based modelling Adaptive capacity Vulnerability Coastal tourism 


  1. Adger W (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):268–281. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balbi S, Giupponi C, Perez P, Alberti M (2013) A spatial agent-based model for assessing strategies of adaptation to climate and tourism demand changes in an alpine tourism destination. Environ Model Softw 45:29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barreteau O, Bousquet F, Attonaty J (2000) Role-playing games for opening the black box of multi-agent systems: method and lessons of its application to Senegal River. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 4(2):5Google Scholar
  4. Barreteau O, Bots P, Daniell K (2010) A framework for clarifying “participation” in participatory research to prevent its rejection for the wrong reasons. Ecol Soc 15(2):1.
  5. Becken S (2013a) A review of tourism and climate change as an evolving knowledge domain. Tour Manage Perspect 6:53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2012.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becken S (2013b) Developing a framework for assessing resilience of tourism sub-systems to climatic factors. Ann Tour Res 43:506–528. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2013.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonabeau E (2002) Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(Suppl 3):7280–7287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brooks N (2003) Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: a conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre Clim Chang Res Working Paper 38:1–16.
  9. Brown C, Ghile Y, Laverty M, Li K (2012) Decision scaling: linking bottom-up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in the water sector. Water Resour Res 48(9), W09537 1–12. doi: 10.1029/2011WR011212
  10. Csete M, Szécsi N (2015) The role of tourism management in adaptation to climate change – a study of a European inland area with a diversified tourism supply. J Sustain Tour 23(3):477–496. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2014.969735 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eakin H, Luers A (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31(1):365–394. doi: 10.1146/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Etienne M (2011) Companion modelling – a participatory approach to support sustainable development. Quæ, Versailles. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-8557-0 Google Scholar
  13. Füssel H (2007) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob Environ Chang 17(2):155–167. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hegger D, Lamers M, Van Zeijl-Rozema A, Dieperink C (2012) Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action. Environ Sci Policy 18:52–65. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson P, Sieber R (2011) An agent-based approach to providing tourism planning support. Environ Plann B 38(3):486–504. doi: 10.1068/b35148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaján E, Saarinen J (2013) Tourism, climate change and adaptation: a review. Curr Issues Tour 16(2):167–195. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2013.774323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klein R, Juhola S (2014) A framework for Nordic actor-oriented climate adaptation research. Environ Sci Policy 40:101–115. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mercer J (2010) Policy arena disaster risk reduction or climate adaptation: are we reinventing the wheel? J Int Dev 22:247–264. doi: 10.1002/jid CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moreno A, Becken S (2009) A climate change vulnerability assessment methodology for coastal tourism. J Sustain Tour 17(4):473–488. doi: 10.1080/09669580802651681 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Perch-Nielsen S (2010) The vulnerability of beach tourism to climate change-an index approach. Clim Chang 100:579–606. doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9692-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Polsky C, Neff R, Yarnal B (2007) Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments: the vulnerability scoping diagram. Glob Environ Chang 17(3–4):472–485. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schroter D, Polsky C, Patt A (2005) Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: an eight step approach. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 10:573–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Scott D (2011) Why sustainable tourism must address climate change. J Sustain Tour 19(1):17–34. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2010.539694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scott D, Simpson M, Sim R (2012) The vulnerability of Caribbean coastal tourism to scenarios of climate change related sea level rise. J Sustain Tour 20(6):883–898. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2012.699063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shakeela A, Becken S (2014) Understanding tourism leaders’ perceptions of risks from climate change: an assessment of policy-making processes in the Maldives using the social amplification of risk framework (SARF). J Sustain Tour 23(1):1–20. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2014.918135 Google Scholar
  26. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):282–292. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soboll A, Schmude J (2011) Simulating tourism water consumption under climate change conditions using agent-based modeling: the example of ski areas. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 101(5):1049–1066. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.561126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomalla F, Downing T, Spanger-Siegfried E, Han G, Rockström J (2006) Reducing hazard vulnerability: towards a common approach between disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation. Disasters 30(1):39–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00305.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Turner B, Kasperson R, Matson P, McCarthy J, Corell R, Christensen L, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(14):8074–8079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231335100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. UNWTO-UNEP-WMO (2008) Climate change and tourism: responding to global challenges climate change and tourism responding to global challenges. Madrid. Retrieved from
  31. World Travel and Tourism Council (2013) Travel and tourism economic impact 2013 Caribbean. World Travel and Tourism Council, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Policy GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenNetherlands
  2. 2.Environmental Systems Analysis GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations