Reconstructing 3D Building Models with the 2D Cadastre for Semantic Enhancement

Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Virtual city models are increasingly used in urban land management processes, which involve the use of different sources of spatial information. This heterogeneous data is, however, often complementary and it may be necessary to give the possibility to join information provided by different sources. This paper presents a method to enhance 3D buildings by using usual 2D vectorial polygon database. These polygons may represent districts, building footprints, or any segmentation of the urban area that adds information to the city model. The enhancement consists in using this polygon database to split the 3D buildings into a set of city objects where each element possesses a 3D geometry and the semantic information of the polygon it is linked to. In this paper, for an illustration purpose, we will present how to create this link between 3D buildings and the cadastre map, in order to create a set of semantically rich 3D building models.

Keywords

3D virtual city Cadastre CityGML Semantic information 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was performed within the BQI program of Université Lyon 1. This work was also supported by the LABEX IMU (ANR-10-LABX-0088) of Université de Lyon, within the program “Investissements d’Avenir” (ANR-11-IDEX-0007) operated by the French National Research Agency (ANR). Data are provided by “Lyon Métropole”. The authors would like to thanks the DINSI team of Lyon Métropole for their valued feedbacks during this collaboration.

References

  1. Agugiaro, G. (2014). From sub-optimal datasets to a CityGML-compliant 3D city model: Experiences from Trento, Italy. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL-4, 7–13.Google Scholar
  2. Durupt, M., & Taillandier, F. (2006). Automatic building reconstruction from a digital elevation model and cadastral data: An operational approach. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 36(Part 3), 142–147.Google Scholar
  3. Gröger, G., Kolbe, T. H., Czerwinski, A., & Nagel, C. (2008). OpenGIS city geography markup language (CityGML) encoding standard, Version 1.0.0, International OGC Standard, Open Geospatial Consortium, Doc. No. 08-007r1.Google Scholar
  4. Kolbe, T. H. (2009). Representing and exchanging 3D city models with cityGML. In J. Lee & S. Zlatanova (Eds.), 3D geoinformation sciences. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Musialski, P., Wonka, P., Aliaga, D. G., Wimmer, M., van Gool, L., & Purgathofer, W. (2012). A survey of urban reconstruction. Eurographics 2012–State of the Art Reports (pp. 1–28).Google Scholar
  6. Pareta, K., & Pareta, U. (2011). Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of Yamuna basin, India using ASTER (DEM) data and GIS. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2(1), 248–269.Google Scholar
  7. Pedrinis, F., Morel, M., & Gesquière, G. (2015). Change detection of cities. In 3D geoinformation science (pp. 123–139). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Ross, L., Bolling, J., Döllner, J., & Kleinschmit, B. (2009). Enhancing 3d city models with heterogeneous spatial information: Towards 3d land information systems. In advances in GIScience (pp. 113–133). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Vallet, B., Pierrot-Deseilligny, M., Boldo, D., & Brédif, M. (2011). Building footprint database improvement for 3D reconstruction: A split and merge approach and its evaluation. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(5), 732–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LIRISUniversity of LyonLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations