Assessing the Suitability of Using Google Glass in Designing 3D Geographic Information for Navigation
No longer are we bound by traditional 2D physical representations; there is a steady shift towards three-dimensional (3D) data. Existing research recognises landmarks to be important navigationally but specific requirements for geometric and semantic attributes in 3D have not been identified. This study assesses the suitability of using Google Glass in real-world experiments investigating the saliency of environmental objects which facilitate pedestrian navigation. From the experiment carried out with fourteen participants, initial results show geometric and semantic detail for navigation are most pertinent between 1.65–7.5 m for buildings. Visual characteristics such as colour, shape and texture are more relevant than function and use.
KeywordsNavigation Google glass Landmarks User-centred design
This project was funded and supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and Ordnance Survey.
- Applied Science Laboratories. (2015). Mobile eye-XG eye tracking glasses. http://www.asleyetracking.com/Site/Products/MobileEyeXGGlasses/tabid/70/Default.aspx
- Bartie, P., Mackaness, W., Petrenz, P., & Dickinson, A. (2014). Clustering landmark image annotations based on tag location and content. In Proceedings of RefNet Workshop on Psychological and Computational Models of Reference Comprehension and Production, 31st August 2014Google Scholar
- Chan, E., Baumann, O., Bellgrove, M. A., & Mattingley, J. B. (2012). From objects to landmarks: the function of visual location information in spatial navigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 3.Google Scholar
- Downs, R. M., & Stea, D. (1974). Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Goldin, S. E., & Thorndyke, P. W. (1982). Simulating navigation for spatial knowledge acquisition. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 24, 457–471.Google Scholar
- Golledge, R. G. (1995). Path selection and route preference in human navigation: A progress report. SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Google. (2014). Google Glass UK. “Google Glass Explorer” Program. https://www.google.co.uk/intl/en/glass/start/. Retrieved August 17, 2014.
- Google. (2015). Google Glass UK. https://www.google.co.uk/intl/en/glass/start/. Retrieved August 18, 2015.
- Kolbe, T. H., Gröger, G., Plümer, L. (2005). CityGML—interoperable access to 3D city models. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geo-information for Disaster Management, 21st–23rd March 2005, Delft, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Musliman, I. A., Rahman, A. A., & Coors, V. (2006). 3D navigation for 3D-GIS—initial requirements. In Proceedings from 3DGeoInfo 2006.Google Scholar
- Partala, T., Nurminen, A., Vainio, T., Laaksonen, J., Laine, M., & Vnnen, J. (2010). Salience of visual cues in 3D city maps. In Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference (pp. 428–432).Google Scholar
- Richter, K.-F., & Winter, S. (2014). Landmarks: GIScience for intelligent services. Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Satalich, G. A. (1995). Navigation and wayfinding in virtual reality: Finding the proper tools and cues to enhance navigational awareness. University of Washington.Google Scholar
- Sensomotoric Instruments. (2015). SMI Eye Tracking Glasses 2 Wireless. http://eyetracking-glasses.com/
- Tobii. (2015). Mobile eye tracking—Tobii Glasses 2. http://www.tobii.com/en/eye-tracking-research/global/products/
- Wong, K. (2012). 3D geographic information and solar panel positioning. MSc Dissertation (unpublished), University College London.Google Scholar
- Xia, J., Packer, D., & Dong, C. (2009). Individual differences and tourist wayfinding behaviours. In 18the World IMACS/MODSIM Congress (1272–1278).Google Scholar