Advertisement

Managing Versions and History Within Semantic 3D City Models for the Next Generation of CityGML

  • Kanishk ChaturvediEmail author
  • Carl Stephen Smyth
  • Gilles Gesquière
  • Tatjana Kutzner
  • Thomas H. Kolbe
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Semantic 3D city models describe city entities by objects with thematic and spatial attributes and their interrelationships. Today, more and more cities worldwide are representing their 3D city models according to the CityGML standard issued by the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC). Various application areas of 3D city models such as urban planning or architecture require that authorities or stakeholders manage parallel alternative versions of city models and their evolution over time, which is currently not supported by the CityGML standard 2.0. In this paper, we propose a concept and a data model extending CityGML by denoting versions of models or model elements as planning alternatives. We support transitions between these versions to manage history or evolution of the city models over time. This approach facilitates the interoperable integration and exchange of different versions of a 3D city model within one dataset, including a possibly complex history of a repository. Such an integrated dataset can be used by different software systems to visualize and work with all the versions. The versions and version transitions in our proposed data model are bi-temporal in nature. They are defined as separate feature types, which allow the users to manage versioning and to perform queries about versions using an OGC Web Feature Service. We apply this data model to a use case of planning concurrent versions and demonstrate it with example instance data. The concept is general in the sense that it can be directly applied to other GML-based application schemas including the European INSPIRE data themes and national standards for topography and cadasters like the British Ordnance Survey Mastermap or the German cadaster standard ALKIS.

Keywords

Semantic 3D city models CityGML Planning versions History City model lifecycle 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Part of this work has been carried out within the project Modeling City Systems funded by the Climate-KIC of the European Institute of Technology and Innovation (EIT). We would like to thank Climate-KIC and the EIT for supporting this work.

References

  1. Beauregard, B., & Speckhard, B. (2014). Oracle Database Workspace Manager Developer’s Guide, 12c Release 1 (12.1) E49170-01.Google Scholar
  2. Beer, D. G., Firmenich, B., & Richter, T. (2004). A concept for CAD systems with persistent versioned data models.Google Scholar
  3. Chambelland, J.-C., Raffin, R., Desbenoit, B., & Gesquière, G. (2011). SIMFOR: Towards a collaborative software platform for urban crisis management.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, S. (2006). Object identifiers in GML. https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/wiki/AppSchemas/GmlIdentifiers#gml:identifier_element. Retrieved June 29, 2015.
  5. De Luca, L., Busarayat, C., Stefani, C., et al. (2010). An iconography-based modeling approach for the spatio-temporal analysis of architectural heritage. In Shape Modeling International Conference (SMI), 2010 (pp. 78–89). IEEE.Google Scholar
  6. Doboš, J., & Steed, A. (2012). 3D Diff: An interactive approach to mesh differencing and conflict resolution. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2012 Technical Briefs (p. 20). ACM.Google Scholar
  7. ESRI. (2004). Versioning| White Papers. http://support.esri.com/es/knowledgebase/whitepapers/view/productid/19/metaid/721. Retrieved February 26, 2015.
  8. Gröger, G., Kolbe, T.H., Nagel, C., & Häfele, K.-H. (2012). OGC city geography markup language (CityGML) encoding standard.Google Scholar
  9. Gröger, G., Kolbe, T. H., Schmittwilken, J., et al. (2005). Integrating versions, history and levels-of-detail within a 3D geodatabase.Google Scholar
  10. INSPIRE Drafting Team “Data Specifications”. (2014). INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model. http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/D2.5_v3.4.pdf. Retrieved April 10, 2015.
  11. Kolbe, T. H. (2009). Representing and exchanging 3D city models with CityGML. In 3D geo-information sciences (pp. 15–31). Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Morel, M., & Gesquière, G. (2014). Managing temporal change of cities with CityGML. In UDMV (pp. 37–42).Google Scholar
  13. Nour, M., & Beucke, K. (2010). Object versioning as a basis for design change management within a BIM context. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on computing in civil and building engineering (ICCCBE-XIII), Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Pédrinis, F., Morel, M., & Gesquière, G. (2015). Change detection of cities. In 3D geoinformation science (pp. 123–139). Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Pfeiffer, M., Carré, C., Delfosse, V., & Billen, R. (2013). Virtual leodium: from an historical 3D city scale model to an archaeological information system. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci II-5 W 1, pp. 241–246.Google Scholar
  16. Redweik, R., & Becker, T. (2015). Change detection in CityGML documents. In 3D geoinformation science (pp. 107–121). Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Stadler, A., & Kolbe, T. H. (2007). Spatio-semantic coherence in the integration of 3D city models. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality, Enschede.Google Scholar
  18. Stefani, C., De Luca, L., Veron, P., & Florenzano, M. (2011). A tool for the 3D spatio-temporal structuring of historic building reconstructions. Digital Media and its Application Culture Heritage, pp. 153–168.Google Scholar
  19. Stefani, C., De Luca, L., Véron, P., & Florenzano, M. (2008). Reasoning about space-time changes: an approach for modeling the temporal dimension in architectural heritage. In Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference.Google Scholar
  20. Stefani, C., De Luca, L., Véron, P., & Florenzano, M. (2010). Time indeterminacy and spatio-temporal building transformations: An approach for architectural heritage understanding. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 4, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vesperman, J. (2006). Essential CVS. O’Reilly Media, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. W3C Recommendation (2011). XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0, 2nd Edn. http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/. Retrieved February 26, 2015.
  23. Zada, A. J,, Tizani, W., & Oti, A. H. (2014). Building information modelling (BIM)—versioning for collaborative design. In Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (pp. 512–519). ASCE.Google Scholar
  24. (2015a). Git User’s Manual. https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html. Retrieved March 9,2015.
  25. (2015b). Mercurial SCM. http://mercurial.selenic.com/. Retrieved March 9, 2015.
  26. (2015c). Apache Subversion. http://subversion.apache.org/. Retrieved March 9, 2015.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kanishk Chaturvedi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carl Stephen Smyth
    • 2
  • Gilles Gesquière
    • 3
  • Tatjana Kutzner
    • 1
  • Thomas H. Kolbe
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of GeoinformaticsTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany
  2. 2.OpenSitePlanAshburnUSA
  3. 3.LIRISUniversité de LyonLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations