Advertisement

Multi-constrained Orientation Field Modeling and Its Application for Fingerprint Indexing

  • Jinwei Xu
  • Jiankun HuEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9408)

Abstract

Fingerprint orientation field, representing the fingerprint ridge-valley structure direction, plays an essential role in fingerprint preprocessing tasks. Orientation field is able to be reconstructed by either non-parameterized or parameterized methods. In this paper, we propose a new parameterized approach for orientation field modeling. The proposed algorithm minimizes a composite model including three constraints corresponding to a least square data fitting term, a total variation regularization and a \(L_1\) sparse regularization. This model has been shown to be very effective for fingerprint orientation field reconstruction. Furthermore, its effectiveness has been proven by several experiments. First, the experiments on poor-quality fingerprint images are conducted. Visual comparisons demonstrate the robustness of the proposed method when processing noisy fingerprint images. Then, as another application of the proposed model, its resultant sparse representation is employed for fingerprint indexing. The experiments on FVC 2000 DB2a and FVC 2002 DB1a datasets show the superior performance of the proposed model for fingerprint indexing.

Keywords

Sparse Representation Penetration Rate Fingerprint Image Short Time Fourier Transform Structural Noise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hong, L., Wan, Y., Jain, A.K.: Fingerprint image enhancement algorithm and performance evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(8), 777–789 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chikkerur, S., Cartwright, A.N., Govindaraju, V.: Fingerprint enhancement using STFT analysis. Pattern Recognition 40(1), 198–211 (2007)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, Y., Hu, J., Phillips, D.: A fingerprint orientation model based on 2D fourier expansion (FOMFE) and its application to singular point detection and fingerprint indexing. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 29(4), 573–585 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, Y., Hu, J.: Global ridge orientation modelling for partial fingerprint identification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 33(1), 72–87 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou, W., Hu, J., Petersen, I., Bennamoun, M.: Partial fingerprint reconstruction with improved smooth extension. In: Lopez, J., Huang, X., Sandhu, R. (eds.) NSS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7873, pp. 756–762. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feng, J., Zhou, J., Jain, A.K.: Orientation field estimation for latent fingerprint enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 35(4), 925–940 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ram, S., Bischof, H., Birchbauer, J.: Modeling fingerprint ridge orientation using Legendre polynomials. Pattern Recognition 43(1), 342–357 (2010)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, M., Yap, P.T.: Invariant representation of orientation fields for fingerprint indexing. Pattern Recognition 45(7), 2532–2542 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, M., Liu, S., Zhao, Q.: Fingerprint orientation field reconstruction by weighted discrete cosine transform. Information Sciences 268, 65–77 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maltoni, D., Maio, D., Jain, A.K., Prabhakar, S.: Hand book of fingerprint recognition. Springer Verlag (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tropp, J.: Greed is good: Algorithmic results for sparse approximation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 50(10), 2231–2242 (2004)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou, J., Gu, J.: A model-based method for the computation of fingerprints’ orientation field. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13(6), 821–835 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, Y., Hu, J., Han, F.: Enhanced gradient-based algorithm for the estimation of fingerprint orientation fields. Applied Mathematics and Computation 185, 823–833 (2007)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhou, W., Hu, J., Wang, S., Petersen, I., Bennamoun, M.: Fingerprint indexing based on combination of novel minutiae triplet features. In: Au, M.H., Carminati, B., Kuo, C.-C.J. (eds.) NSS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8792, pp. 377–388. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang, J., Zhang, S., Metaxas, D.: Efficient MR image reconstruction for compressed MR images. Medical Image Analysis 15, 670–679 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Amir, B., Marc, T.: Fast gradient-based algorithms for constrained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 18(11), 2419–2434 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yuan, B., Su, F., Cai, A.: Fingerprint retrieval approach based on novel minutiae triplet features. In: IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems, pp. 170–175 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Iloanusi, O., Gyaourova, A., Ross, A.: Indexing fingerprints using minutiae quadruplets. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp. 127–133 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering and Information TechnologyThe University of New South WalesCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations