Advertisement

Understanding the Patient 2.0

Gaining Insight into Patients’ Rating Behavior by User-Generated Physician Review Mining
  • Michaela GeierhosEmail author
  • Frederik S. Bäumer
  • Sabine Schulze
  • Caterina Klotz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9405)

Abstract

Patients 2.0 increasingly inform themselves about the quality of medical services on physician rating websites. However, little is known about whether the reviews and ratings on these websites truly reflect the quality of services or whether the ratings on these websites are rather influenced by patients’ individual rating behavior. Therefore, we investigate more than 790,000 physician reviews on Germany’s most used physician rating website jameda.de. Our results show that patients’ ratings do not only reflect treatment quality but are also influenced by treatment quality independent factors like age and complaint behavior. Hence, we provide evidence that users should be well aware of user specific rating distortions when intending to make their physician choice based on these ratings.

Keywords

Health 2.0 Rating behavior Patient opinion mining on physician rating websites 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Partial support for this work was provided by the Ministry of Innovation, Higher Education and Research of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.

References

  1. 1.
    Beck, A.J.: Nutzung und Bewertung deutscher Arztbewertungsportale durch Patienten in deutschen Hausarztpraxen. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Ulm (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Emmert, M., Gerstner, B., Sander, U., Wambach, V.: Eine Bestandsaufnahme von Bewertungen auf Arztbewertungsportalen am Beispiel des Nürnberger Gesundheitsnetzes Qualität und Effizienz (QuE). Gesundheitsökonomie & Qualitätsmanagement (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Emmert, M., Sander, U., Esslinger, A., Maryschok, M., Schöffski, O., et al.: Public reporting in Germany: the content of physician rating websites. Methods Inf. Med. 51(2), 112 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Emmert, M., Halling, F., Meier, F.: Evaluations of dentists on a German physician rating website: an analysis of the ratings. J. Med. Internet Res. 17(1), e15 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Emmert, M., Maryschok, M., Eisenreich, S., Schöffski, O.: Arzt-Bewertungsportale im Internet: Geeignet zur Identifikation guter Arztpraxen? Das Gesundheitswesen 71(4), 218–219 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Emmert, M., Meier, F.: An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument. J. Med. Internet Res. 15(8), e157 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Emmert, M., Meier, F., Heider, A.K., Dürr, C., Sander, U.: What do patients say about their physicians? an analysis of 3000 narrative comments posted on a German physician rating website. Health Policy 118(1), 66–73 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emmert, M., Meier, F., Pisch, F., Sander, U.: Physician choice making and characteristics associated with using physician-rating websites: cross-sectional study. J. Med. Internet Res. 15(8), e187 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Emmert, M., Sander, U., Pisch, F.: Eight questions about physician-rating websites: a systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 15(2), e24 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fischer, S.: Project “Weisse Liste”: a German best practice example for online provider ratings in health care. In: Gurtner, S., Soyez, K. (eds.) Challenges and Opportunities in Health Care Management, pp. 339–346. Springer, Switzerland (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fischer, S., Emmert, M.: A review of scientific evidence for public perspectives on online rating websites of healthcare providers. In: Gurtner, S., Soyez, K. (eds.) Challenges and Opportunities in Health Care Management, pp. 279–290. Springer, Switzerland (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gao, G.G., McCullough, J.S., Agarwal, R., Jha, A.K.: A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period. J. Med. Internet Res. 14(1), e38 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geierhos, M., Bäumer, F.S., Schulze, S., Stuß, V.: Filtering reviews by random individual error. In: Ali, M., Kwon, Y.S., Lee, C.-H., Kim, J., Kim, Y. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9101, pp. 305–315. Springer, Heidelberg (2015) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Geierhos, M., Bäumer, F.S., Schulze, S., Stuß, V.: “I grade what I get but write what I think”. Inconsistency Analysis in Patients’ Reviews. In: ECIS 2015 Completed Research Papers, Paper 55. pp. 1–15. AIS (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grishman, R.: Information extraction: techniques and challenges. In: Pazienza, M.T. (ed.) Information Extraction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Emerging Information Technology. LNCS, vol. 1299, pp. 10–27. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hanauer, D.A., Zheng, K., Singer, D.C., Gebremariam, A., Davis, M.M.: Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA 311(7), 734–735 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hennig, S., Etgeton, S.: Arztbewertungen im Internet. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit-DuD 35(12), 841–845 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hinz, V., Drevs, F., Wehner, J.: Electronic word of mouth about medical services. Technical report, Hamburg Center for Health Economics (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    López, A., Detz, A., Ratanawongsa, N., Sarkar, U.: What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 27(6), 685–692 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reimann, S., Strech, D.: The representation of patient experience and satisfaction in physician rating sites. A criteria-based analysis of english - and german-language sites. BMC Health Serv. Res. 10(1), 332 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sander, U., Emmert, M., Grobe, T.: Effektivität Effektivität und Effizienz der Arztsuche mit Arztsuch- und Bewertungsportalen und Google. Das Gesundheitswesen 75(06), 397–399 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schaefer, C., Schwarz, S.: Wer findet die besten Ärzte Deutschlands?: Arztbewertungsportale im Internet. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 104(7), 572–577 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Strech, D., Reimann, S.: German language physician rating sites. Das Gesundheitswesen 74(8–9), e61–e67 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Strech, D.: Arztbewertungsportale aus ethischer Perspektive. Eine orientierende Analyse. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im. Gesundheitswesen 104(8), 674–681 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Terlutter, R., Bidmon, S., Röttl, J.: Who uses physician-rating websites? differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites. J. Med. Internet Res. 16(3), e97 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Verhoef, L.M., Van de Belt, T.H., Engelen, L.J., Schoonhoven, L., Kool, R.B.: Social media and rating sites as tools to understanding quality of care a scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 16(2), e56 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michaela Geierhos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Frederik S. Bäumer
    • 1
  • Sabine Schulze
    • 1
  • Caterina Klotz
    • 1
  1. 1.Heinz Nixdorf InstituteUniversity of PaderbornPaderbornGermany

Personalised recommendations