Advertisement

You’re Doing It Wrong! Studying Unexpected Behaviors in Child-Robot Interaction

  • Séverin Lemaignan
  • Julia Fink
  • Francesco Mondada
  • Pierre Dillenbourg
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9388)

Abstract

We present a study on the impact of unexpected robot behaviors on the perception of a robot by children and their subsequent engagement in a playful interaction based on a novel “domino” task. We propose an original analysis methodology which blends behavioral cues and reported phenomenological perceptions into a compound index.

While we found only a limited recognition of the different misbehaviors of the robot that we attribute to the age of the child participants (4–5 years old), interesting findings include a sustained engagement level, an unexpectedly low level of attribution of higher cognitive abilities and a negative correlation between anthropomorphic projections and actual behavioral engagement.

Keywords

Social Robot Unexpected Behavior Robot Behavior High Cognitive Ability Domino Tile 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bickmore, T., Schulman, D., Yin, L.: Maintaining engagement in long-term interventions with relational agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 24(6), 648–666 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fink, J., Rétornaz, P., Vaussard, F., Wille, F., Franinović, K., Berthoud, A., Lemaignan, S., Dillenbourg, P., Mondada, F.: Which robot behavior can motivate children to tidy up their toys? Design and evaluation of “Ranger”. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Flavell, J.H.: The development of children’s knowledge about the mind: From cognitive connections to mental representations. Developing Theories of Mind 244–267 (1988)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kahn Jr, P.H., Friedman, B., Pérez-Granados, D.R., Freier, N.G.: Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interaction Studies 7(3), 405–436 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leite, I.: Long-term Interactions with Empathic Social Robots. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisboa, Portugal (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leite, I., Pereira, A., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., Prada, R., Paiva, A.: The influence of empathy in human-robot relations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 71(3), 250–260 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lemaignan, S., Fink, J., Dillenbourg, P.: The dynamics of anthropomorphism in robotics. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Human-Robot Interaction Conference, pp. 226–227 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mondada, F., Fink, J., Lemaignan, S., Mansolino, D., Wille, F., Franinović, K.: Ranger, an example of integration of robotics into the home ecosystem. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop and Summer School on Medical and Service Robotics (MESROB). Springer (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Short, E., Hart, J., Vu, M., Scassellati, B.: No fair. An interaction with a cheating robot. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 219–226 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weiss, A., Wurhofer, D., Tscheligi, M.: “I love this Dog”-Children’s emotional attachment to the robotic dog AIBO. International Journal of Social Robotics 1(3), 243–248 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Séverin Lemaignan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Julia Fink
    • 1
  • Francesco Mondada
    • 2
  • Pierre Dillenbourg
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer-Human Interaction in Learning and Instruction Lab (CHILI)École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Systèmes Robotiques (LSRO)École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations