Advertisement

UMBC_Ebiquity-SFQ: Schema Free Querying System

  • Zareen SyedEmail author
  • Lushan Han
  • Muhammad Rahman
  • Tim Finin
  • James Kukla
  • Jeehye Yun
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 548)

Abstract

Users need better ways to explore large complex linked data resources. Using SPARQL requires not only mastering its syntax and semantics but also understanding the RDF data model, the ontology and URIs for entities of interest. Natural language question answering systems solve the problem, but these are still subjects of research. The Schema agnostic SPARQL queries task defined in SAQ-2015 challenge consists of schema-agnostic queries following the syntax of the SPARQL standard, where the syntax and semantics of operators are maintained, while users are free to choose words, phrases and entity names irrespective of the underlying schema or ontology. This combination of query skeleton with keywords helps to remove some of the ambiguity. We describe our framework for handling schema agnostic or schema free queries and discuss enhancements to handle the SAQ-2015 challenge queries. The key contributions are the robust methods that combine statistical association and semantic similarity to map user terms to the most appropriate classes and properties used in the underlying ontology and type inference for user input concepts based on concept linking.

Keywords

Information storage and retrieval User interfaces Semantic web 

References

  1. 1.
    Cimiano, P., Haase, P., Heizmann, J.: Porting natural language interfaces between domains: an experimental user study with the ORAKEL system. In: Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 180–189. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dredze, M., McNamee, P., Rao, D., Gerber, A., Finin, T.: Entity disambiguation for knowledge base population. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, August 2010Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Han, L., Finin, T., Joshi, A.: Schema-free structured querying of DBpedia data. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 2090–2093. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Han, L., Finin, T., McNamee, P., Joshi, A., Yesha, Y.: Improving word similarity by augmenting pmi with estimates of word polysemy. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. IEEE Comput. Soc. 25(6), 1307–1322 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harris, Z.S.: Mathematical Structures of Language. Wiley, New York (1968)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kashyap, A., Han, L., Yus, R., Sleeman, J., Satyapanich, T., Gandhi, S., Finin, T.: Meerkat mafia: multilingual and cross-level semantic textual similarity systems In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, August 2014Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin, D., Pantel, P.: Discovery of inference rules for question answering. Natural Lang. Eng. 7(4), 343–360 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin, D.: Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 768–774, Montreal (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mihalcea, R., Corley, C., Strapparava, C.: Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity. In: Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 775–780 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milne, D., Witten, I.H.: Learning to link with wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 509–518. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rapp, R.: Word sense discovery based on sense descriptor dissimilarity. In: Proceedings of the 9th Machine Translation Summit, pp. 315–322 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Syed, Z., Finin, T.: Creating and exploiting a hybrid knowledge base for linked data. In: Filipe, J., Fred, A., Sharp, B. (eds.) ICAART 2010. CCIS, vol. 129, pp. 3–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zareen Syed
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lushan Han
    • 1
  • Muhammad Rahman
    • 1
  • Tim Finin
    • 1
  • James Kukla
    • 2
  • Jeehye Yun
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Maryland Baltimore CountyBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.RedShredBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations