Advertisement

Optimizing Student and Supervisor Interaction During the SciPro Thesis Process – Concepts and Design

  • Preben Hansen
  • Henrik Hansson
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9412)

Abstract

In order for students to complete their bachelor, master and Ph.D. theses they need feedback, cues, guidance and supervision. Common problems perceived by students are too little instructions as well as infrequent and insufficient supervisor feedback. At Stockholm University, the SciPro (Supporting the Scientific Process) system has been developed to tackle these problems. This paper describes, analyze and discuss the interaction between students and supervisors using the SciPro system. The results show high level of interaction between students and supervisors in the thesis handling process. However, six special groups of needs were identified: support for (1) language(s), (2) research methods, (3) self-study, (4) creativity, (5) “How to write”, and (6) inspiration and motivation. The collaborative stage of group-supervision may be one possible way to deal with the different type of support for the process of managing student theses.

Keywords

Supervision Learning support system Scipro 

References

  1. 1.
    Muilenburg, L.Y., Berge, Z.L.: Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Educ. 26(1), 29–48 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aghaee, N., Hansson, H.: Peer portal: quality enhancement in thesis writing using self managed peer review on a mass scale. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 14(1), 186–203 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hansson, H., Moberg, J.: Quality processes in technology enhanced thesis work. In: Proceedings of the 24th ICDE World Conference (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fook, J.: Developing critical reflection as a research method. In: Creative Spaces for Qualitative Researching: Living Research. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bradbury, H., Reason, P.: Action research: an opportunity for revitalizing research purpose and practices. Qual. Soc. Work 2(2), 155–175 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gibbs, G.: Learning by Doing: A Guide to Teaching and Learning Methods. FEU, London (1988)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Talja, S., Hansen, P.: Information sharing. In: Spink, A., Cole, C. (eds.) New Directions in Human Information Behavior. Information Science and Knowledge Management Series, vol. 8, pp. 113–134. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hansen, P., Järvelin, P.: Collaborative information retrieval in an information-intensive domain. Inf. Process. Manage. 41(5), 1101–1119 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations