International Colloquium on Theoretical Aspects of Computing

Theoretical Aspects of Computing - ICTAC 2015 pp 110-125

# Quotienting the Delay Monad by Weak Bisimilarity

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9399)

## Abstract

The delay datatype was introduced by Capretta [3] as a means to deal with partial functions (as in computability theory) in Martin-Löf type theory. It is a monad and it constitutes a constructive alternative to the maybe monad. It is often desirable to consider two delayed computations equal, if they terminate with equal values, whenever one of them terminates. The equivalence relation underlying this identification is called weak bisimilarity. In type theory, one commonly replaces quotients with setoids. In this approach, the delay monad quotiented by weak bisimilarity is still a monad. In this paper, we consider Hofmann’s alternative approach [6] of extending type theory with inductive-like quotient types. In this setting, it is difficult to define the intended monad multiplication for the quotiented datatype. We give a solution where we postulate some principles, crucially proposition extensionality and the (semi-classical) axiom of countable choice. We have fully formalized our results in the Agda dependently typed programming language.

### References

1. 1.
Adámek, J., Milius, S., Velebil, J.: Elgot algebras. Log. Methods Comput. Sci. 2(5:4), 1–31 (2006)
2. 2.
Benton, N., Kennedy, A., Varming, C.: Some domain theory and denotational semantics in Coq. In: Berghofer, S., Nipkow, T., Urban, C., Wenzel, M. (eds.) TPHOLs 2009. LNCS, vol. 5674, pp. 115–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
3. 3.
Capretta, V.: General recursion via coinductive types. Log. Methods Comput. Sci. 1(2:1), 1–28 (2005)
4. 4.
Chicli, L., Pottier, L., Simpson, D.: Mathematical quotients and quotient types in Coq. In: Geuvers, H., Wiedijk, F. (eds.) TYPES 2002. LNCS, vol. 2646, pp. 95–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
5. 5.
Cockett, R., Díaz-Boïls, J., Gallagher, J., Hrubes, P.: Timed sets, complexity, and computability. In: Berger, U., Mislove, M. (eds.) Proceedings of 28th Conference on the Mathematical Foundations of Program Semantics, MFPS XXVIII. Electron. Notes in Theor. Comput. Sci., vol. 286, pp. 117–137. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012)Google Scholar
6. 6.
Hofmann, M.: Extensional Constructs in Intensional Type Theory. CPHS/BCS Distinguished Dissertations. Springer, London (1997)
7. 7.
Hughes, J.: Generalising monads to arrows. Sci. Comput. Program. 37(1–3), 67–111 (2000)
8. 8.
Jacobs, B., Heunen, C., Hasuo, I.: Categorical semantics for arrows. J. Funct. Program. 19(3–4), 403–438 (2009)
9. 9.
Kraus, N., Escardó, M., Coquand, T., Altenkirch, T.: Notions of anonymous existence in Martin-Löf type theory. Manuscript (2014)Google Scholar
10. 10.
Maietti, M.E.: About effective quotients in constructive type theory. In: Altenkirch, T., Naraschewski, W., Reus, B. (eds.) TYPES 1998. LNCS, vol. 1657, pp. 166–178. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
11. 11.
Martin-Löf, P.: 100 years of Zermelo’s axiom of choice: what was the problem with it? Comput. J. 49(3), 345–350 (2006)
12. 12.
Moggi, E.: Notions of computation and monads. Inf. Comput. 93(1), 55–92 (1991)
13. 13.
Norell, U.: Dependently typed programming in Agda. In: Koopman, P., Plasmeijer, R., Swierstra, D. (eds.) AFP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5832, pp. 230–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
14. 14.
Troelstra, A.S., Van Dalen, D.: Constructivism in Mathematics: An Introduction, v. I. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 121. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988)Google Scholar
15. 15.
The Univalent Foundations Program: Homotopy Type Theory: Univalent Foundations of Mathematics. Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NY (2013). http://homotopytypetheory.org/book