Advertisement

Lightweight, Dynamic, and Flexible Cipher Scheme for Wireless and Mobile Networks

  • Hassan Noura
  • Damien Couroussé
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 155)

Abstract

The security of Wireless and Mobile Networks (WN, and MN, respectively) is crucial for effective deployment in various areas and applications such as military and business. The existing security solutions are based on static block /stream cipher to ensure Data Confidentiality (DC). These solutions require multi-round function, and consequently a high computing complexity and energy consumption. However, WN or MN has limited resources that prevent their efficient deployment for a long period. To overcome the previous challenge, a new kind of cipher scheme based on a dynamic permutation packets cipher is presented in this paper to ensure the DC requirements with low computation complexity. Theoretical results show that the proposed algorithm has a reduced computational complexity, which can lead to reduce the energy consumption. It is equally important to note that our proposed solution could be adapted for other kinds of networks that employ packet transmission such as vehicular network.

Keywords

Data Confidentiality dynamic and lightweight cipher flexible permutation layer security analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Huang, Y.: Research of efficient security scheme in wireless network. In: Liu, X., Ye, Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Linear Drives for Industry Applications, volume 4. LNEE, vol. 273, pp. 717–724. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karygiannis, T., Owens, L.: Wireless network security. In: NIST Special Publication, vol. 800, p. 48 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daemen, J., Rijmen, V.: The Design of Rijndael: AES - The Advanced Encryption Standard. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dworkin, M., Dworkin, M., Gallagher, P.D., Director Nist Special Publication -f : Recommendation for block cipher modes of operation: Methods and techniques (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee, H., Lee, K., Shin, Y.: Aes implementation and performance evaluation on 8-bit microcontrollers. CoRR, abs/0911.0482 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Evans-Pughe, C.: Bzzzz zzz [ZigBee wireless standard]. IEE Review 49(3), 28–31 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raza, S., Slabbert, A., Voigt, T., Landernäs, K.: Security considerations for the wireless hart protocol. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation, ETFA 2009, pp. 242–249. IEEE Press, Piscataway (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Perrig, A., Szewczyk, R., Tygar, J.D., Wen, V., Culler, D.E.: Spins: security protocols for sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. 8(5), 521–534 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karlof, C., Sastry, N., Wagner, D.: Tinysec: a link layer security architecture for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys 2004, pp. 162–175. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karlof, C., Sastry, N., Wagner, D.: Tinysec: a link layer security architecture for wireless sensor networks. In: ACM, pp. 162–175 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skipjack, N.: KEA algorithm specifications (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rivest, R.L.: The rc5 encryption algorithm. In: Preneel, B. (ed.) FSE 1994. LNCS, vol. 1008, pp. 86–96. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, T., Wu, H., Wang, X., Bao, F.: SenSec design. Institue for InfoComm Research, Tech. Rep. TR-I2R-v1, vol. 1 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Du, W., Deng, J., Han, Y.S., Varshney, P.K., Katz, J., Khalili, A.: A pairwise key predistribution scheme for wireless sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC) 8(2), 228–258 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Noura, H., Martin, S., Agha, K.A.: E3sn - efficient security scheme for sensor networks. In: SECRYPT, pp. 615–621 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Noura, H., Martin, S., AI Agha, K., Grote, W.: Key dependent cipher scheme for sensor networks. In: 2013 12th Annual Mediterranean Hoc Networking Workshop (MED-HOC-NET), pp. 148–154, June 2013Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, R.B., Shi, Z., Yang, X.: Cryptography efficient permutation instructions for fast software. IEEE Micro 21(6), 56–69 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Campagna, M.J.: Security bounds for the nist codebook-based deterministic random bit generator (2006), matthew.campagna@pb.com 13453 received November 1, 2006. http://eprint.iacr.org/2006/379
  19. 19.
    Thirteen Ways to Look at the Correlation Coefficient. The American Statistician 42(1), 59–66 (1988)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hassan Noura
    • 1
    • 2
  • Damien Couroussé
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Univ. Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.CEA, LIST, MINATEC CampusGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations