German Conference on Pattern Recognition

Pattern Recognition pp 183-195 | Cite as

Joint 3D Object and Layout Inference from a Single RGB-D Image

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9358)

Abstract

Inferring 3D objects and the layout of indoor scenes from a single RGB-D image captured with a Kinect camera is a challenging task. Towards this goal, we propose a high-order graphical model and jointly reason about the layout, objects and superpixels in the image. In contrast to existing holistic approaches, our model leverages detailed 3D geometry using inverse graphics and explicitly enforces occlusion and visibility constraints for respecting scene properties and projective geometry. We cast the task as MAP inference in a factor graph and solve it efficiently using message passing. We evaluate our method with respect to several baselines on the challenging NYUv2 indoor dataset using 21 object categories. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed method is able to infer scenes with a large degree of clutter and occlusions.

References

  1. 1.
    Aubry, M., Maturana, D., Efros, A., Russell, B., Sivic, J.: Seeing 3D chairs: exemplar part-based 2D–3D alignment using a large dataset of CAD models. In: CVPR (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blake, A., Kohli, P., Rother, C.: Markov Random Fields for Vision and Image Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carreira, J., Sminchisescu, C.: CPMC: automatic object segmentation using constrained parametric min-cuts. PAMI 34(7), 1312–1328 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choi, W., Chao, Y.W., Pantofaru, C., Savarese, S.: Understanding indoor scenes using 3D geometric phrases. In: CVPR (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C.K.I., Winn, J., Zisserman, A.: The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge. IJCV 88(2), 303–338 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Felzenszwalb, P.F., Girshick, R.B., McAllester, D.A.: Cascade object detection with deformable part models. In: CVPR (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Felzenszwalb, P.F., Mcauley, J.J.: Fast inference with min-sum matrix product. PAMI 33(12), 2549–2554 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fouhey, D.F., Gupta, A., Hebert, M.: Data-driven 3D primitives for single image understanding. In: ICCV (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gilks, W., Richardson, S.: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman & Hall, London (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: CVPR (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Güney, F., Geiger, A.: Displets: resolving stereo ambiguities using object knowledge. In: CVPR (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo, R., Hoiem, D.: Support surface prediction in indoor scenes. In: ICCV (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gupta, S., Arbelaez, P., Malik, J.: Perceptual organization and recognition of indoor scenes from RGB-D images. In: CVPR (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gupta, S., Girshick, R., Arbeláez, P., Malik, J.: Learning rich features from RGB-D images for object detection and segmentation. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014, Part VII. LNCS, vol. 8695, pp. 345–360. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hedau, V., Hoiem, D., Forsyth, D.: Recovering the spatial layout of cluttered rooms. In: ICCV (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jia, Z., Gallagher, A., Saxena, A., Chen, T.: 3D-based reasoning with blocks, support, and stability. In: CVPR (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang, H., Xiao, J.: A linear approach to matching cuboids in RGB-D images. In: CVPR (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim, B., Xu, S., Savarese, S.: Accurate localization of 3D objects from RGB-D data using segmentation hypotheses. In: CVPR (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kohli, P., Ladicky, L., Torr, P.H.S.: Robust higher order potentials for enforcing label consistency. IJCV 82(3), 302–324 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kohli, P., Kumar, M.P.: Energy minimization for linear envelope MRFs. In: CVPR (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Komodakis, N., Paragios, N.: Beyond pairwise energies: efficient optimization for higher-order MRFs. In: CVPR (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, D., Gupta, A., Hebert, M., Kanade, T.: Estimating spatial layout of rooms using volumetric reasoning about objects and surfaces. In: NIPS (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lim, J.J., Khosla, A., Torralba, A.: FPM: fine pose parts-based model with 3D CAD models. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014, Part VI. LNCS, vol. 8694, pp. 478–493. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lim, J.J., Pirsiavash, H., Torralba, A.: Parsing IKEA objects: fne pose estimation. In: ICCV (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin, D., Fidler, S., Urtasun, R.: Holistic scene understanding for 3D object detection with RGB-D cameras. In: ICCV (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mansinghka, V., Kulkarni, T., Perov, Y., Tenenbaum, J.: Approximate bayesian image interpretation using generative probabilistic graphics programs. In: NIPS 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mcauley, J.J., Caetano, T.S.: Faster algorithms for max-product message-passing. JMLR 12, 1349–1388 (2011)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Menze, M., Geiger, A.: Object scene flow for autonomous vehicles. In: CVPR (2015)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Menze, M., Heipke, C., Geiger, A.: Joint 3d estimation of vehicles and scene flow. In: ISA (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Newcombe, R.A., Izadi, S., Hilliges, O., Molyneaux, D., Kim, D., Davison, A.J., Kohli, P., Shotton, J., Hodges, S., Fitzgibbon, A.: Kinectfusion: real-time dense surface mapping and tracking. In: ISMAR (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Potetz, B., Lee, T.S.: Efficient belief propagation for higher-order cliques using linear constraint nodes. CVIU 112(1), 39–54 (2008)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ren, X., Bo, L., Fox, D.: RGB-(D) scene labeling: features and algorithms. In: CVPR (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roberts, L.G.: Machine perception of three-dimensional solids. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1963)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rother, C., Kohli, P., Feng, W., Jia, J.: Minimizing sparse higher order energy functions of discrete variables. In: CVPR (2009)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Satkin, S., Hebert, M.: 3DNN: viewpoint invariant 3D geometry matching for scene understanding. In: ICCV (2013)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schwing, A.G., Urtasun, R.: Efficient exact inference for 3D indoor scene understanding. In: Fitzgibbon, A., Lazebnik, S., Perona, P., Sato, Y., Schmid, C. (eds.) ECCV 2012, Part VI. LNCS, vol. 7577, pp. 299–313. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schwing, A.G., Fidler, S., Pollefeys, M., Urtasun, R.: Box in the box: joint 3D layout and object reasoning from single images. In: ICCV (2013)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Silberman, N., Hoiem, D., Kohli, P., Fergus, R.: Indoor segmentation and support inference from RGBD images. In: Fitzgibbon, A., Lazebnik, S., Perona, P., Sato, Y., Schmid, C. (eds.) ECCV 2012, Part V. LNCS, vol. 7576, pp. 746–760. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Song, S., Xiao, J.: Sliding shapes for 3D object detection in depth images. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014, Part VI. LNCS, vol. 8694, pp. 634–651. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tarlow, D., Givoni, I.E., Zemel, R.S.: Hop-map: efficient message passing with high order potentials. In: AISTATS (2010)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tighe, J., Niethammer, M., Lazebnik, S.: Scene parsing with object instances and occlusion ordering. In: CVPR (2014)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tsai, G., Xu, C., Liu, J., Kuipers, B.: Real-time indoor scene understanding using Bayesian filtering with motion cues. In: ICCV (2011)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang, C., Komodakis, N., Paragios, N.: Markov random field modeling, inference & learning in computer vision & image understanding: a survey. CVIU 117(11), 1610–1627 (2013)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yamaguchi, K., McAllester, D., Urtasun, R.: Robust monocular epipolar flow estimation. In: CVPR (2013)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhang, H., Geiger, A., Urtasun, R.: Understanding high-level semantics by modeling traffic patterns. In: ICCV (2013)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhang, Y., Song, S., Tan, P., Xiao, J.: PanoContext: a whole-room 3D context model for panoramic scene understanding. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014, Part VI. LNCS, vol. 8694, pp. 668–686. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zheng, B., Zhao, Y., Yu, J.C., Ikeuchi, K., Zhu, S.C.: Beyond point clouds: scene understanding by reasoning geometry and physics. In: CVPR (2013)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zia, M., Stark, M., Schiele, B., Schindler, K.: Detailed 3D representations for object recognition and modeling. PAMI 35(11), 2608–2623 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Intelligent SystemsTübingenGermany
  2. 2.Université Paris-EstParisFrance

Personalised recommendations