International Conference on Fundamentals of Software Engineering

Fundamentals of Software Engineering pp 259-274

Painless Support for Static and Runtime Verification of Component-Based Applications

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9392)

Abstract

Architecture Description Languages (ADL) provide descriptions of a software system in terms of its structure. Such descriptions give a high-level overview and come from the need to cope with arbitrarily complex dependencies arising from software components.

In this paper we present Painless, a novel ADL with a declarative trait supporting parametrized specifications and architectural reconfigurations. Moreover, we exhibit its reliable facet on its integration with ProActive — a middleware for distributed programming. This is achieved by building on top of Mefresa, a Coq framework for the reasoning on software architectures. We inherit its strong guarantees by extracting certified code, and subsequently integrating it in our toolchain.

Keywords

The Coq Proof Assistant Component-based Engineering Formal Methods Architecture Description Language 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ActiveEon, S.A.S.: ProActive - A Library for Parallel and Distributed ProgrammingGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baude, F., Caromel, D., Dalmasso, C., Danelutto, M., Getov, V., Henrio, L., Pérez, C.: GCM: a grid extension to fractal for autonomous distributed components. Annales des Télécommunications (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baude, F., Henrio, L., Naoumenko, P.: Structural reconfiguration: an autonomic strategy for GCM components. In: Proc. of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems: ICAS 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruneton, E., Coupaye, T., Stefani, J.-B.: The Fractal component model (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clerc, X.: OCaml-Java: OCaml on the JVM. In: Loidl, H.-W., Peña, R. (eds.) TFP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7829, pp. 167–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cosmo, R.D., Zacchiroli, S., Zavattaro, G.: Towards a formal component model for the cloud. In: Eleftherakis, G., Hinchey, M., Holcombe, M. (eds.) SEFM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7504, pp. 156–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    David, P.-C., Ledoux, T., Coupaye, T., Léger, M.: FPath and FScript: Language support for navigation and reliable reconfiguration of Fractal architectures. Annals of Telecommunications 64(1-2), 45–63 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Di Ruscio, D., Malavolta, I., Muccini, H., Pelliccione, P., Pierantonio, A.: ByADL: An MDE framework for building extensible architecture description languages. In: Babar, M.A., Gorton, I. (eds.) ECSA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6285, pp. 527–531. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Endler, M., Wei, J.: Programming generic dynamic reconfigurations for distributed applications. In: International Workshop on Configurable Distributed Systems, pp. 68–79 (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ETSI. ETSI TS 102 829 V1.1.1 - GRID; Grid Component Model (GCM); GCM Fractal Architecture Description Language (ADL). Technical Spec., ETSI (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaspar, N., Henrio, L., Madelaine, E.: Bringing Coq into the world of GCM distributed applications. International Journal of Parallel Programming, 1–20 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoare, C.A.R.: An axiomatic basis for computer programming. Communications of the ACM 12(10), 576–580 (1969)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lallet, J., Pillement, S., Sentieys, O.: xMAML: A modeling language for dynamically reconfigurable architectures. In: Antonio, N., Carballo, P.P. (eds.) DSD, pp. 680–687. IEEE Computer Society (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morrison, R., Kirby, G.N.C., Balasubramaniam, D., Mickan, K., Oquendo, F., Cîmpan, S., Warboys, B., Snowdon, B., Greenwood, R.M.: Constructing Active Architectures in the ArchWare ADL. CoRR (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sanchez, A., Barbosa, L.S., Riesco, D.: Bigraphical modelling of architectural patterns. In: Arbab, F., Ölveczky, P.C. (eds.) FACS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7253, pp. 313–330. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    The Coq Development Team. The Coq Proof Assistant Reference Manual (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nuno Gaspar
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ludovic Henrio
    • 2
  • Eric Madelaine
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.INRIASophia AntipolisFrance
  2. 2.Univ. Nice Sophia Antipolis, CNRS, I3S, UMR 7271Sophia AntipolisFrance
  3. 3.ActiveEon S.A.SSophia AntipolisFrance

Personalised recommendations