Distinctions Between Computer Simulations and Other Technologies for Science Education
Chapter
First Online:
Abstract
We define simulations as algorithmic, dynamic, often simplified models of real-world or hypothetical phenomenon that contain features that not only allow but promote the exploration of ideas, manipulation of parameters, observation of events, and testing of questions. Many of the features in this definition overlap with other educational technologies, including static animations, serious games, and virtual worlds. In what follows, we address how simulations differ from such technologies despite these overlapping features. We conclude that an interactive nature paired with a lack of extrinsically embedded motivational structures primarily distinguishes simulations from other educational technologies.
Keywords
Computer simulations Educational technology Serious games Simulations Static visualizations Animations Technology-enhanced learning Extrinsic rewards Motivational structures Virtual worlds Narrative Entertainment Entertaining featuresReferences
- Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–107. doi: 10.1007/BF02504859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clark, D. B., Nelson, B., Sengupta, P., & D’Angelo, C. (2009). Rethinking science learning through digital games and simulations: Genres, examples, and evidence. Paper commissioned for the National Research Council workshop on gaming and simulations.Google Scholar
- Clark, D. B., Nelson, B. C., Chang, H. Y., Martinez-Garza, M., Slack, K., & D’Angelo, C. M. (2011). Exploring Newtonian mechanics in a conceptually-integrated digital game: Comparison of learning and affective outcomes for students in Taiwan and the United States. Computers and Education, 57(3), 2178–2195. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- D’Angelo, C., Rutstein, D., Harris, C., Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., & Haertel, G. (2014). Simulations for STEM learning: Systematic review and meta-analysis (executive summary). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
- Goldman, K. H., Koepfler, J., & Yocco, V. (2009). WolfQuest summative evaluation: Full summative report. Institute for Learning Innovation. http://www.informalscience.org/images/evaluation/WQ_Full_Summative_Report.pdf. Retrieved 2015.
- Honey, M., & Hilton, M. (Eds.). (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. Committee on Science Learning: Computer Games, Simulations, and Education. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Kafai, Y. B. (2010). World of Whyville: An introduction to tween virtual life. Games and Culture, 5(1), 3–22. doi: 10.1177/1555412009351264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, J., Kladwang, W., Lee, M., Cantu, D., Azizyan, M., Kim, H., et al. (2014). RNA design rules from a massive open laboratory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(6), 2122–2127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mayo, M. (2009, January). Video games: A route to large-scale STEM education? Science, 79–82. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/323/5910/79.short. Retrieved 2015.
Copyright information
© AECT 2016