International Conference on Entertainment Computing

Entertainment Computing - ICEC 2015 pp 238-251 | Cite as

Interactive Digital Gameplay Can Lower Stress Hormone Levels in Home Alone Dogs — A Case for Animal Welfare Informatics

  • Annika Geurtsen
  • Maarten H. Lamers
  • Marcel J. M. Schaaf
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9353)

Abstract

Social isolation, when owners are not home, is a major stressor for dogs leading to separation anxiety and related behavioral and physiological issues. We investigate whether a digital interactive game requiring no human interference reduces stress response in dogs when isolated. An interactive game was developed specifically for canines. Dogs were domestically tested, totaling 15 days with and 15 days without the game. Twice-daily saliva samples were analyzed for cortisol stress hormone concentrations; ethograms were constructed. Combined data confirm that digital interactive games can lessen physiological and behavioral stress responses in dogs, and that the effect is modulated by a dog’s personality.

Keywords

animal welfare interactive games stress games for health and well-being 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrantes, R.: Dog language. Wakan Tanka Publishers (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aslaksen, S., Aukrust, K.: Hundens adferd når den er hjemme alene. Master Thesis, Institutt for Husdyr- og Akvakulturvitenskap, Norway (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beerda, B., et al.: The use of saliva cortisol, urinary cortisol, and catecholamine measurements for a noninvasive assessment of stress responses in dogs. Hormones and Behavior 30(3), 272–279 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beerda, B., et al.: Behavioural and hormonal indicators of enduring environmental stress in dogs. Animal Welfare 9(1), 49–62 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Campbell, S.A., et al.: Some effects of limited exercise on purpose-bred beagles. American Journal of Veterinary Research 49(8), 1298–1301 (1988)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coppola, C.L., Grandin, T., Enns, R.M.: Human interaction and cortisol: can human contact reduce stress for shelter dogs? Physiology & Behavior 87, 537–541 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coren, S.: How dogs think: understanding the canine mind. Simon and Schuster, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Weerth, C., et al.: Measurement of cortisol in small quantities of saliva. Clinical Chemistry 49(4), 658–660 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dognition: see the world through your best friends eyes. http://www.dognition.com
  10. 10.
    Dreschel, N.A., Granger, D.A.: Methods of collection for salivary cortisol measurement in dogs. Hormones and Behavior 55(1), 163–168 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evans, M.: Dogs: Their secret lives. Channel 4 Television (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gácsi, M., et al.: Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills. PLoS One 4(8) (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geurtsen, A.: An experiment in animal welfare informatics: effects of digital interactive gameplay on the psychological welfare of home alone dogs. Master of Science Thesis, Media Technology program, Leiden University (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grooten, E.: Playing with pigs: researching the complex relationship between pigs and humans through game design. http://www.playingwithpigs.nl
  15. 15.
    Hare, B., et al.: The domestication hypothesis for dogs’ skills with human communication: a response to Udell et al (2008) and Wynne et al (2008). Animal Behaviour 79, e1–e6 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hare, B., Woods, V.: The genius of dogs: discovering the unique intelligence of man’s best friend. Oneworld Publications, London (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hawkley, L.C., Cacioppo, J.T.: Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 40, 218–227 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hekman, J.P., Karas, A.Z., Dreschel, N.A.: Salivary cortisol concentrations and behavior in a population of healthy dogs hospitalized for elective procedures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 141(3), 149–157 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hertz, G.: Cockroach controlled mobile robot. http://www.conceptlab.com/roachbot
  20. 20.
    Herzing, D.: Could we speak the langauge of dolphins? video. In: TED 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hirskyj-Douglas, I., Read, J.C.: Animal computer interaction design. In: ACM-W 2014, Manchester, UK (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holze, R., Shimoyama, I.: Locomotion control of a bio-robotic system via electric stimulation. In: Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 3, pp. 1514–1519 (1997)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Animal hospital of North Asheville: What’s your dog’s style? Breeds, toys and play styles. http://www.ahna.net/what-your-puppys-style-breeds-toys-and-play-styles
  24. 24.
    Jensen, P.: The behavioural biology of dogs. Cabi Publishing, UK (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lamers, M.H., van Eck, W.: Why simulate? hybrid biological-digital games. In: Di Chio, C., et al. (eds.) EvoApplications 2012. LNCS, vol. 7248, pp. 214–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maharbiz, M.M., Hirotaka, S.: Cyborg beetles. Scientific American 303(6), 94–99 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mancini, C.: Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto. Interactions 18, 69–73 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mancini, C., Zamansky, A.: Charting unconquered territories: intelligent systems for animal welfare. In: 40th Annual Convention of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, pp. 181–182 (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mankoff, D., et al.: Supporting interspecies social awareness: using peripheral displays for distributed pack awareness. In: Proc UIST, 2005, pp. 253–258 (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Miklósi, A., et al.: A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Current Biology 13(9), 763–766 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Miklósi, A., et al.: A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (canis familiaris) and humans and cats (felis catus) and humans. Journal of Comparative Psychology 119(2), 179 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Miklósi, A., Soproni, K.: A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Animal Cognition 9(2), 81–93 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Miller, P.E., Murphy, C.J.: Vision in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 207(12), 1623–1634 (1995)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Noz, F., An, J.: Cat cat revolution: an interspecies gaming experience. In: Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2661–2664 (2011)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Overall, K.L., Dyer, D.: Enrichment strategies for laboratory animals from the viewpoint of clinical veterinary behavioral medicine: emphasis on cats and dogs. ILAR Journal 46(2), 202–216 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Paarsovaara, S., et al.: The secret life of my dog: design and evaluation of pawtracker concept. In: Proc. 13th Int. Conf. on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 231–240 (2011)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rehn, T., Keeling, L.J.: The effect of time left alone at home on dog welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 129, 129–135 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Resner, B. I.: Rover@home: computer mediated remote interaction between humans and dogs. MSc Thesis, Media Arts and Sciences program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2001)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Fields, W.M., Taglialatela, J.P.: Ape consciousness—human consciousness: a perspective informed by language and culture. American Zoologist 40(6), 910–921 (2000)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Scaglia, E., et al.: Video analysis of adult dogs when left home alone. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 8(6), 412–417 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Skinner, B.F.: Pigeons in a pelican. American Psychologist 15, 28 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Talwar, S.K., et al.: Behavioural neuroscience: rat navigation guided by remote control. Nature 417(6884), 37–38 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tan, R.T.K.C., Cheok, A.D., Teh, J.K.S.: Metazoa ludens: mixed reality environment for playing computer games with pets. International Journal of Virtual Reality 5(3), 53–58 (2006)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tuber, D.S., et al.: Behavioral and glucocorticoid responses of adult domestic dogs (canis familiaris) to companionship and social separation. Journal of Comparative Psychology 110, 103–108 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    van Eck, W., Lamers, M.H.: Animal controlled computer games: Playing pac-man against real crickets. In: Harper, R., Rauterberg, M., Combetto, M. (eds.) ICEC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4161, pp. 31–36. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    van Eck, W., Lamers, M.H.: Hybrid biological-digital systems in artistic and entertainment computing. Leonardo Journal of Arts, Sciences and Technology 46, 151–158 (2013)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vestrum, I. G.: Aleneatferd hos hunder som lever i en gruppe. Master Thesis, Husdyrvitenskap program, Institutt for Husdyr- og Akvakulturvitenskap (2009)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wingrave, C.A., et al.: Early explorations of CAT: canine amusement and training. In: Proc. CHI EA, pp. 2661–2670 (2010)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wolfe, T.L.: Policy, program and people: the three p’s to well-being. In: Mench, J.A., Krulisch, L. (eds.) Canine Research Environment, pp. 41–47. Scientists Center for Animal Welfare, Bethseda (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annika Geurtsen
    • 1
  • Maarten H. Lamers
    • 1
  • Marcel J. M. Schaaf
    • 2
  1. 1.Media Technology Research GroupLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Leiden Institute of BiologyLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations