Evaluating the Indoor Football Tracking Accuracy of a Radio-Based Real-Time Locating System

  • Thomas Seidl
  • Matthias Völker
  • Nicolas Witt
  • Dino Poimann
  • Titus Czyz
  • Norbert Franke
  • Matthias Lochmann
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 392)

Abstract

Nowadays, many tracking systems in football provide positional data of players but only a few systems provide reliable data of the ball. The tracking quality of many available systems suffers from high ball velocities up to 120 km/h and from the occlusion of both the players and the ball. Radio-based local positioning systems use sensors integrated in the ball and located on the players’ back or near the shoes to avoid such issues. However, a qualitative evaluation of the tracking precision of radio-based systems is often not available and to the best of our knowledge there are actually no studies that deal with the positional accuracy of ball tracking. In this paper we close this gap and use the RedFIR radio-based locating system together with a ball shooting machine to repeatedly simulate realistic situations with different velocities in an indoor environment. We compare the derived positions from high speed camera footage to the positions provided by the RedFIR system by means of root mean square error (RMSE) and Bland-Altman analysis. We found an overall positional RMSE of 12.5 cm for different ball velocities ranging from 45 to 61 km/h. There was a systematic bias of 11.5 cm between positions obtained by RedFIR and positions obtained by the high speed camera. Bland-Altman analysis showed 95 % limits of agreement of [21.1 cm, 1.9 cm]. Taking the ball diameter of 22 cm into account these results indicate that RedFIR is a valid tool for kinematic, tactical and time-motion analysis of ball movements in football.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bland, J.M., Altman, D.G.: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between measurement. Biochimica Clinica 11, 399–404 (1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castellano, J., Alvarez-Pastor, D., Bradley, P.: Evaluation of research using computerised tracking systems (amisco and prozone) to analyse physical performance in elite soccer: a systematic review. Sports Med 44, 701–712 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chakraborty, B., Meher, S.: A trajectory-based ball detection and tracking system with applications to shooting angle and velocity estimation in basketball videos. In: 2013 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON). pp. 1–6. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, H.T., Tsai, W.J., Lee, S.Y., Yu, J.Y.: Ball tracking and 3d trajectory approximation with applications to tactics analysis from single-camera volleyball sequences. Multimed Tools Appl 60, 641–667 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choppin, S., Goodwill, S.R., Haake, S.J., Miller, S.: 3d player testing at the wimbledon qualifying tournament. In: Miller, S., Capel-Davies, J. (eds.) Tennis science and technology 3. pp. 333–340. International tennis federation (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Di Salvo, V., Collins, A., McNeill, B., Cardinale, M.: Validation of Prozone: A new video-based performance analysis system. Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport 6(1), 108–119 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eidloth, A., Lehmann, K., Edelhaeusser, T., von der Gruen, T.: The test and application center for localization systems L.I.N.K. In: International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation. pp. 27–30 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frencken, W., Lemmink, K., Dellemann, N.: Soccer-specific accuracy and validity of the local position measurement (LPM) system. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 13, 641–645 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gomez, G., Herrera Lopez, P., Link, D., Eskofier, B.: Tracking of ball and players in beach volleyball videos. PLoS ONE 9(11), e111730 (11 2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    von der Gr¨un, T., Franke, N., Wolf, D., Witt, N., Eidloth, A.: A real-time tracking system for football match and training analysis. In: Microelectronic Systems. pp. 199–212. Springer Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gueziec, A.: Tracking pitches for broadcast television. Computer 35, 38–43 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kelley, J., Choppin, S., Goodwill, S., Haake, S.: Validation of a live, automatic ball velocity and spin rate finder in tennis. Procedia Engineering 2(2), 2967 – 2972 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, S.X., Jiang, L., Garner, J., Vermette, S.: Video based soccer ball tracking. 2010 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis & Interpretation pp. 53–56 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moeslund, T., Thomas, G., Hilton, A.: Computer Vision in Sports, Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mutschler, C., Ziekow, H., Jerzak, Z.: The debs 2013 grand challenge. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems. pp. 283–294 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ogris, G., Leser, R., Horsak, B., Kornfeind, P., Heller, M., Baca, A.: Accuracy of the LPM tracking system considering dynamic position changes. Journal of Sports Sciences 30(14), 1503–1511 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Owens, N., Harris, C., Stennet, C.: Hawk-eye tennis system. Proc Inf Conf Visual Information Engineering 2003 (2), 182–185 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siegle, M., Stevens, T., Lames, M.: Design of an accuracy study for position detection in football. Journal of Sports Sciences 31(2), 166–172 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Seidl
    • 1
  • Matthias Völker
    • 1
  • Nicolas Witt
    • 1
  • Dino Poimann
    • 2
  • Titus Czyz
    • 2
  • Norbert Franke
    • 1
  • Matthias Lochmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated CircuitsNurembergGermany
  2. 2.Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations