Advertisement

Development of a Novel Immersive Interactive Virtual Reality Cricket Simulator for Cricket Batting

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 392)

Abstract

Research in the field of sports performance is constantly developing new technology to help extract meaningful data to aid in understanding in a multitude of areas such as improving technical or motor performance. Video playback has previously been extensively used for exploring anticipatory behaviour. However, when using such systems, perception is not active. This loses key information that only emerges from the dynamics of the action unfolding over time and the active perception of the observer. Virtual reality (VR) may be used to overcome such issues. This paper presents the architecture and initial implementation of a novel VR cricket simulator, utilising state of the art motion capture technology (21 Vicon cameras capturing kinematic profile of elite bowlers) and emerging VR technology (Intersense IS-900 tracking combined with Qualisys Motion capture cameras with visual display via Sony Head Mounted Display HMZ-T1), applied in a cricket scenario to examine varying components of decision and action for cricket batters. This provided an experience with a high level of presence allowing for a real-time egocentric view-point to be presented to participants. Cyclical user-testing was carried out, utilisng both qualitative and quantitative approaches, with users reporting a positive experience in use of the system.

Keywords

Virtual-reality Presence Cricket Sport Psychology Training Performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gibson, J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston; London:HoughtonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mifflin.Shim, J., & Carlton, L. G. (1999) Anticipation of movement outcome through perception of movement kinematics. Journal of Applied Sport Exercise Psychology 21:S98Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Craig, C.M. (2014) Understanding perception and action in sport: How can virtual reality technology help? Sports Technology 6(4)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pinder, R. A., Renshaw, I., & Davids, K. (2009) Information-movement coupling in developing cricketers under changing ecological practice constraints. Human Movement Science 28(4): 468-479Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weissensteiner, J., Abernethy, B., Farrow, D., & Muller, S. (2008) The development of anticipation: A cross-sectional examination of the practice experiences contributing to skill in cricket batting. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 30(6):663-684Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mann, D. L., Abernethy, B., & Farrow, D. (2010) Action specificity increases anticipatory performance and the expert advantage in natural interceptive tasks. Acta Psychologica 135(1):17-23Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Portus, M. R., & Farrow, D. (2011) Enhancing cricket batting skill: Implications for biomechanics and skill acquisition research and practice. Sports Biomechanics 10(4):294-305Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dessing, J., & Craig, C. (2010) Bending it Like Beckham: How to Visually Fool the Goalkeeper. Plos One 5(10) e13161.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McMenemy, K., & Ferguson, S. (2007) A hitchhiker’s guide to virtual reality. Wellesley, MA: A K Peters, Ltd.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brault S, Bideau B, Craig C, Kulpa R (2010) Balancing deceit and disguise: How to successfully fool the defender in a 1 vs. 1 situation in rugby. Hum Movement Science 29:412-425Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brault, S., Bideau, B., Kulpa, R., & Craig, C. M. (2012) Detecting deception in movement: The case of the side-step in rugby. Plos One 7(6) e37494Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7(3):225 - 240Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Slater, M., Wilbur S. (1997) A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, MIT Press 6(6):603-616Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miles, H. C., Pop, S. R., Watt, S. J., Lawrence, G. P., & John, N. W. (2012) A review of virtual environments for training in ball sports Computers & Graphics 36(6):714 - 726Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Land, M. F., & McLeod, P. (2000) From eye movements to actions: How batsmen hit the ball. Nature Neuroscience 3:1340-1345Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyQueen’s University of BelfastBelfastUK
  2. 2.Movement ScienceAustralian Institute of SportCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations