International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management in Mediterranean Countries

Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management in Mediterranean Countries pp 167-180 | Cite as

Ethical Framework for a Disaster Management Decision Support System Which Harvests Social Media Data on a Large Scale

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 233)

Abstract

This paper presents preliminary results of ongoing research on the ethics of using social media on a large scale in disaster management.

To date social media use by disaster response agencies has been relatively ad-hoc. The Slándáil project aims to build a system for harvesting publicly available data from social media and using it in an ethically responsible and appropriate way to enhance the response of emergency services to natural disaster.

The ethical framework draws on the traditions of Isaiah Berlin’s value pluralism and Giorgio Agamben’s State of Exception in its approach. Value pluralism relates to an understanding that every pluralist society is organized around several and different sets of values and traditions. State of Exception theory is concerned with ethical consequences that arise when governments or state agencies arrogate to themselves extra powers in response to extraordinary circumstances, such as a natural disaster.

The implications of these ethical approaches for the Slándáil system are examined and discussed according to their impact on the various stakeholders: the system end-users, the public at large, the state and the emergency responders themselves. Implications for the technical design and governance of the system are also deduced and evaluated.

Keywords

Ethics Value pluralism State of exception Disaster management Social media 

References

  1. 1.
    Ashktorab, Z., et al.: Tweedr: Mining twitter to inform disaster response. In: Proceedings of the 11th International ISCRAM Conference (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berlin, I.: Two concepts of liberty. In: Hardy, H. (ed.) Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty, pp. 166–217. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Criddle, E.J., Fox-Decent, E.: Human rights, emergencies, and the rule of law. Hum. Rights Q. 34(1), 39–87 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diner, D., Stolleis, M.: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt: A Juxtaposition. Bleicher, Gerlingen (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Galston, W.A.: What value pluralism means for legal-constitutional orders. San Diego Law Rev. 47(2), 803–818 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geale, S.K.: The ethics of disaster management. Disaster Prev. Manag. 21(4), 445–462 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gross, O.: Normless and exceptionless exception: Carl Schmitt’s theory of emergency powers and the norm-exception Dichotomy. Cardozo Law Rev. 21, 1825 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gross, O., Ní Aoláin, F.: From discretion to scrutiny: revisiting the application of the margin of appreciation doctrine in the context of article 15 of the European convention on human rights. Hum. Rights Q. 23(3), 625–649 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van den Hoven, J.: The use of normative theories in computer ethics. In: Floridi, L. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, pp. 59–76. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Imran, M., et al.: AIDR: artificial intelligence for disaster response. In: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, pp. 159–162. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Imran, M., et al.: Extracting information nuggets from disaster-related messages in social media. In: Proceedings of the 10th International ISCRAM Conference (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kinne, B.: Voltaire never said it! Mod. Lang. Notes. 58(7), 534–535 (1943)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lazar, N.C.: States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Middleton, S.E., et al.: Real-time crisis mapping of natural disasters using social media. IEEE Intell. Syst. 29(2), 9–17 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Narayanan, A., Shmatikov, V.: Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP 2008, pp. 111–125 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nieuwenburg, P.: The agony of choice Isaiah Berlin and the phenomenology of conflict. Adm. Soc. 35(6), 683–700 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spicer, M.W.: Value pluralism and its implications for American public administration. Adm. Theor. Prax. 23(4), 507–528 (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Starbird, K., et al.: Rumors, false flags, and digital vigilantes: misinformation on twitter after the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing. Presented at the 1 March 2014Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Swan, P.: American empire or empires: alternative juridifications of the new world order. In: Bartholomew, A. (ed.) Empire’s Law: The American Imperial Project and the “War to Remake the World”, pp. 137–160. Pluto Press, Ann Arbor, London, Toronto (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    United Nations: Disaster Management Cycle (2014). http://www.un-spider.org/glossary/disaster-management-cycle
  21. 21.
    United Nations, Economic and Social Council: Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1985)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wagenaar, H.: The necessity of value pluralism in administrative practice a reply to overeem. Adm. Soc. 46(8), 1020–1028 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wagenaar, H.: Value pluralism in public administration. Adm. Theor. Prax. 21(4), 441–449 (1999)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Watson, H., et al.: Citizen (in)security?: Social media, citizen journalism and crisis response. Presented at the ISCRAM 2014 Conference Proceedings - 11th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wright, D., et al.: Ethical dilemma scenarios and emerging technologies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 87, 325–336 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yin, J., et al.: Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness. IEEE Intell. Syst. 27(6), 52–59 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Irish School of EcumenicsTrinity College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations