Advertisement

Governance of Societies

  • Christian Werthmann
  • Ortwin Renn
  • Anastassia Makarieva
  • Victor Gorshkov
  • Peter A. Wilderer
  • Verena Risse
  • Carolin Böker
  • Bettina Haas
Part of the Strategies for Sustainability book series (STSU)

Abstract

It is no secret that the world is urbanizing very fast. If UN estimates turn out to be true, by midcentury 2.5 billion people will have joined the approximately 3.9 billion living in cities today, an urban population increase of over 60 %! It is one of the biggest questions of our time, how the 6.4 billion who will live in cities by 2050 will be fed, housed and provided with basic services in a sustainable way. What kind of infrastructure and governance models will be the most healthy in the progressing urbanization of the planet? What is the best mix between decentralization and centralization of services, infrastructure and government structures?

Keywords

Genetic Program Technological Progress Large Animal Thermal Photon Living Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

References of Section 3.2

  1. Parsons TE, Shils EA (1951) Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Renn O (2014) Das Risikoparadox. Warum wir uns vor dem Falschen fürchten. Fischer Taschenbuch, Frankfurt am Main, pp 498–523Google Scholar
  3. Rosa E, Renn O, McCright A (2014) The risk society revisited. Risk governance and social theory. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, pp 173–178Google Scholar

References of Section 3.3

  1. Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2012) Is the use of renewable energy sources an answer to the problems of global warming and pollution? Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 42:99–154. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2010.498754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman JM, Bargh JA (2010) The purpose-driven life: commentary on Kenrick et al. (2010). Perspect Psychol Sci 5:323–326. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguiar M, Hurst E (2006) Measuring trends in leisure: the allocation of time over five decades. Working paper no. 12082, National Bureau of Economic Research. doi: 10.3386/w12082
  4. Anitori RP (ed) (2012) Extremophiles. Microbiology and biotechnology. Caister Academic Press, NorfolkGoogle Scholar
  5. Aslak T, Bruaset AM (2013) The internet of things. In: Bruaset AM, Aslak T (eds) Conversations about challenges in computing. Springer, New York, pp 21–26. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-00209-5_3Google Scholar
  6. Atkinson RD, Ezell SJ (2012) Innovation economics: the race for global advantage. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  7. Berner RA (1990) Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels over Phanerozoic time. Science 249:1382–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boehm C (2000) Conflict and the evolution of social control. J Conscious Stud 7:79–101Google Scholar
  9. Canganella F (2012) Ecology and biotechnology of extremophilic microorganisms, particularly anaerobic thermophiles. In: Singh OV (ed) Extremophiles: sustainable resources and biotechnological implications. Wiley, Hoboken. doi: 10.1002/9781118394144.ch7Google Scholar
  10. Carlstead K, Fraser J, Bennett C, Kleiman DG (1999) Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) in U.S. zoos. II. Behavior, breeding success, and mortality in relation to housing facilities. Zoo Biol 18:35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowen T (2011) The great stagnation. Dutton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Dean J, Ghemawat S (2008) MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun ACM 51:107–113. doi: 10.1145/1327452.1327492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobzhansky T (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teach 35:125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dombrowski U, Wagner T (2014) Mental strain as field of action in the 4th industrial revolution. Procedia CIRP 17:100–105. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Downing K, Zvirinsky P (1999) The simulated evolution of biochemical guilds: reconciling Gaia theory and natural selection. Art Life 5:291–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Free A, Barton NH (2007) Do evolution and ecology need the Gaia hypothesis? Trends Ecol Evol 22:611–619. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrels RM, Lerman A (1981) Phanerozoic cycles of sedimentary carbon and sulfur. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:4652–4656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gintis H (2012) Clash of the titans. Bioscience 62:987–991. doi: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.11.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gordon RJ (2014) The demise of U.S. economic growth: restatement, rebuttal, and reflections. Working paper no. 19895. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi: 10.3386/w19895
  20. Gorshkov VG (1995) Physical and biological bases of life stability. Man, biota, environment. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gorshkov VG, Makar'eva AM (2001) On the possibility of physical self-organization of biological and ecological systems. Dokl Biol Sci 378:258–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gorshkov VG, Makarieva AM (2002) Greenhouse effect dependence on atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse substances and the nature of climate stability on earth. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 2:289–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gorshkov VG, Gorshkov VV, Makarieva AM (2000) Biotic regulation of the environment: key issue of global change. Springer-Praxis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Gorshkov VG, Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VV (2004) Revising the fundamentals of ecological knowledge: the biota-environment interaction. Ecol Complex 1:17–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2003.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haber W (2004) Landscape ecology as a bridge from ecosystems to human ecology. Ecol Res 19:99–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00615.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanauer N (2012) Rich people do not create jobs. Censored TED talk available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKCvf8E7V1g
  27. Kaplan H, Hill K, Lancaster J, Hurtado AM (2000) A theory of human life history evolution: diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evol Anthropol 9:156–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kenrick DT, Griskevicius V, Neuberg SL, Schaller M (2010) Renovating the pyramid of needs: contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspect Psychol Sci 5:292–314. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kesebir S, Graham J, Oishi S (2010) A theory of human needs should be human-centered, not animal-centered: commentary on Kenrick et al. (2010). Perspect Psychol Sci 5:315–319. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kharas H, Kohli H (2011) What is the middle income trap, why do countries fall into it, and how can it be avoided? Glob J Emerg Mark Econ 3:281–289. doi: 10.1177/097491011100300302Google Scholar
  31. Knauft BM (1991) Violence and sociality in human evolution [and comments and replies]. Curr Anthropol 32:321–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lerat S, Gauci R, Catford JG, Vierheilig H, Piché Y, Lapointe L (2002) 14C transfer between the spring ephemeral Erythronium americanumand sugar maple saplings via arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in natural stands. Oecologia 132:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lovelock J (1988) The Ages of Gaia. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Lyubomirsky S, Boehm JK (2010) Human motives, happiness, and the puzzle of parenthood: commentary on Kenrick et al. (2010). Perspect Psychol Sci 5:327–334. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG (2001) The greenhouse effect and the stability of the global mean surface temperature. Dokl Earth Sci 377:210–214Google Scholar
  36. Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG (2007) Biotic pump of atmospheric moisture as driver of the hydrological cycle on land. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:1013–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG (2010) The biotic pump: condensation, atmospheric dynamics and climate. Int J Water 5:365–385. doi: 10.1504/IJW.2010.038729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG, Li B-L (2004a) Ontogenetic growth: models and theory. Ecol Model 176:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG, Li B-L (2004b) Body size, energy consumption and allometric scaling: a new dimension in the diversity-stability debate. Ecol Complex 1:139–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG, Li B-L, Chown SL, Reich PB, Gavrilov VM (2008) Mean mass-specific metabolic rates are strikingly similar across life’s major domains: evidence for life’s metabolic optimum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16994–16999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG, Sheil D, Nobre AD, Bunyard P, Li B-L (2014) Why does air passage over forest yield more rain? Examining the coupling between rainfall, pressure, and atmospheric moisture content. J Hydrometeorol 15:411–426. doi: 10.1175/JHM-D-12-0190.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mojzsis SJ, Arrhenius G, McKeegan KD, Harrison TM, Nutman AP, Friend CRL (1996) Evidence of life on Earth before 3,800 million years ago. Nature 384:55–69. doi: 10.1038/384055a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mokyr J (2013) Is technological progress a thing of the past? VOX (CEPR’s policy portal). http://www.voxeu.org/print/9700
  44. Nowak MA, Tarnita CE, Wilson EO (2010) The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466:1057–1062. doi: 10.1038/nature09205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nowak et al (2011) Nature 471:E9–E10. doi: 10.1038/nature09836 (Reply)
  46. Peterson C, Park N (2010) What happened to self-actualization? Commentary on Kenrick et al. (2010). Perspect Psychol Sci 5:320–322. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schwartzman DW, Volk T (1989) Biotic enhancement of weathering and habitability of earth. Nature 340:457–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sheil D, Murdiyarso D (2009) How forests attract their rain: an examination of a new hypothesis. Bioscience 59:341–347. doi: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.4.12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van der Hejden MG, Horton TR (2009) Socialism in soil? The importance of mycorrhizal fungal networks for facilitation in natural ecosystems. J Ecol 97:1139–1150. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01570.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vause WG (1995) The subsidiarity principle in European union law – American federation compared. J Int Law 61–68Google Scholar
  51. Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ (1998) Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:6578–6583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilderer PA (2009) Climate change and its consequences for water and wastewater management. Front Environ Sci Eng China 3:2–11. doi: 10.1007/s11783-009-0001-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References of Section 3.4

  1. Aristotle (1998) The metaphysics translated with an introduction by H. Lawson-Tancred. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Caney S (2005) Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change. Leiden J Int Law 18:747–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Rivetti I, Fraschetti S, Lionello P, Zambianchi E, Boero F (2014) Global warming and mass mortalities of benthic invertebrates in the Mediterranean sea. PLoS ONE 9(12), e115655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Scholte J-A (2008) Defining globalisation. World Econ 31:1471–1502Google Scholar
  5. UNHCR (2014) UNHCR global trends 2013. http://www.unhcr.org/5399a14f9.html. Accessed 14 Jan 2015.

References of Section 3.5

  1. Fachinger U (2008) The end of discrimination in social security for the elderly? Z Gerontol Geriatr 41(5):360–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gibb H, O’Leary KG (2014) Mercury exposure and health impacts among individuals in the artisanal and small-scale gold mining community: a comprehensive review. Environ Health Perspect 122:667–672Google Scholar
  3. Grambow M (2013) Nachhaltige Wasserbewirtschaftung, Konzept und Umsetzung eines vernünftigen Umgangs mit dem Gemeingut Wasser. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 307–400Google Scholar
  4. Haber W (2010) Die unbequemen Wahrheiten der Ökologie, Eine Nachhaltigkeitsperspektive für das 21 Jahrhundert. Oekom-Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  5. Islam N (2013) Towards a sustainable social model: implications for the post-2015 agenda. UN-world economic and social survey (WESS) 2014 background paperGoogle Scholar
  6. Kirmayer LJ (2002) Psychopharmacology in a globalizing world: the use of antidepressants in Japan. Transcult Psychiatry 39:295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mello AF, Maciel MR, Fossaluza V, de Paula CS, Grassi-Oliveira R, Cavalcante-Nóbrega LP, Cividanes GC, Soussumi Y, Soussumi SP, Perissinotti DNM, Bordin IA, Mello MF, Mari JJ (2014) Exposure to maltreatment and urban violence in children working on the streets in Saõ Paulo, Brazil: factors associated with street work. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 36:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz UniversityHannoverGermany
  2. 2.University of StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  3. 3.National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute” Petersburg Nuclear Physics InstituteSt. PetersburgRussia
  4. 4.Institute for Earth System Preservation (IESP)Technical University of MunichGarchingGermany
  5. 5.Munich School of Philosophy and Frankfurt UniversityMunichGermany
  6. 6.Technical University of MunichMunichGermany
  7. 7.Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment and Consumer Protection, Section on Soil Protection, Contaminated Sites and GeologyMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations