Advertisement

Cultural Diversities Across and Within Cultures: The Bicultural Mind

  • Olivia RealdonEmail author
  • Valentino Zurloni
Chapter

Abstract

In the current transition from structural to process models in the scientific inquiry on culture dynamics, culture is not viewed as consensual, enduring, and context-general, but as fragmented, fluctuating, and context-specific (situated cognition model). Bicultural individuals that, through enduring exposure to at least two cultures, have come to possess a bicultural mind, that is, systems of meaning and practices of both cultures, can therefore switch between such cultural orientations alternating them depending on the cultural cues (cultural primers) available in the immediate context (cultural frame switching). The bicultural mind roots in a dynamic bicultural brain: although culture is limited to what the brain can or cannot do, it does also shape brain functions, that is, neural connectivity is likely modified through sustained engagement in cultural practices. Built in a theoretical framework combining a co-evolutionary perspective on biology and culture with the expert-novice dynamics of cultural transmission and appropriation, the bicultural mind thus provides an articulated theoretical milieu apt to address the “why” and “how” (rather than “what”) questions on the managing of cultural diversities within and across cultures. And, in Gould’s view on punctuated equilibria, it can even be considered as the next evolutionary jump within the human species.

Keywords

Cultural traits Cultural priming Bicultural mind Embodied cognition Cultural affordances 

References

  1. Ames, D. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2010). Cultural neuroscience. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(2), 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anolli, L. (2004). Psicologia della cultura [Culture psychology]. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  3. Anolli, L. (2011). La sfida della mente multiculturale. Nuove forme di convivenza [The challenge of the multicultural mind. Novel trajectories for shaping the way to live together]. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.Google Scholar
  4. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609.Google Scholar
  5. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benet-Martinez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, W. M. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 492–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benet-Martinez, V., Lee, F., & Leu, J. (2006). Biculturalism and cognitive complexity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(1), 386–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd, D., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, D. T. (1975). On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist, 30, 1103–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (2005). The human genoma diversity project: Past, present, and future. Nature Review: Genetics, 6, 333–340.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, S.-X., Benet-Martinez, V., & Bond, M. H. (2008). Bicultural identity, bilingualism, and psychological adjustment in multicultural societies: Immigration-based and globalization-based acculturation. Journal of Personality, 76(4), 803–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N. (1967). Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  14. Craig, A. D. (2003). Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 500–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Craig, A. D. (2008). Interoception and emotion: A neuroanatomical perspective. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 272–292). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33, 25–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Damasio, A. R. (2010). Self comes to mind. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  18. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: Heath.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fu, H.-Y., Morris, M. W., Lee, S. I., Chao, M. C., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y.-Y. (2007). Epistemic motives and cultural conformity: Need for closure, culture, and context as determinants of conflict judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  23. Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hatano, G. (1997). Commentary: Core domains of thought, innate constraints, and sociocultural contexts. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 75, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heatherton, T. F., Wyland, C. L., Macrae, C. N., Demos, K. E., Denny, B. T., & Kelley, W. M. (2006). Medial prefrontal activity differentiates self from close others. Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 1, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. E. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ho, D. Y. F. (1986). Chinese patterns of socialization: A critical review. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 1–35). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Hong, Y.-Y. (2009). A dynamic constructivist approach to culture: Moving from describing culture to explaining culture. In R. S. Wyer, C.-Y. Chiu, & Y.-Y. Hong (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application (pp. 3–23). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hong, Y.-Y., Yeung, G., Chiu, C.-Y., & Tong, Y. (1999). Social comparison during political transition: Interaction of entity versus incremental beliefs and social identities. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hong, Y.-Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-Y., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hong, Y.-Y., Benet-Martinez, V., Chiu, C., & Morris, M. W. (2003). Boundaries of cultural influence: Construct activation as a mechanism for cultural differences in social perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 453–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kashima, Y. (2009). Culture comparison and culture priming. In R. S. Wyer, C.-Y. Chiu, & Y.-Y. Hong (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application (pp. 53–77). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kashima, Y., Klein, O., & Clark, A. E. (2007). Grounding: Sharing information in social interaction. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 27–77). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kitayama, S., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Yin and yang of the Japanese self: The cultural psychology of personality coherence. In D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social cognitive bases of personality consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 242–302). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kitayama, S., & Uskul, A. (2011). Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 419–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. LaFromboise, T., Coleman, H., & Gerton, J. (1993). Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levins, R., & Lewontin, R. C. (1985). The dialectical biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Levinson, S. C. (2005). Introduction: The evolution of culture in a microcosm. In S. C. Levinson & P. Jaisson (Eds.), Evolution and culture (pp. 1–43). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lewis, P. A., Critchley, H. D., Rotshtein, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2007). Neural correlates of processing valence and arousal in affective words. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 742–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewontin, R. C. (2000). The triple helix: Gene, organism, and environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Macrae, C. N., Moran, J. M., Heatherton, T. F., Banfield, J. F., & Kelley, W. M. (2004). Medial prefrontal activity predicts memory for self. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 647–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ma-Kellams, C., Blascovich, J., & McCall, C. (2012). Culture and the body: East–West differences in visceral perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 718–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matsumoto, D., & Yoo, S. H. (2006). Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 234–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Menary, R. (2010). The extended mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mesquita, B., Barrett, L. F., & Smith, E. R. (Eds.). (2010). The mind in context. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  48. Ng, S. H., & Han, S. (2009). The bicultural self and the bicultural brain. In R. S. Wyer, C.-Y. Chiu, & Y.-Y. Hong (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application (pp. 329–342). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  49. Ng, S. H., Han, S., Mao, L., & Lai, J. C. L. (2010). Dynamic cultural brains: A fMRI study of their flexible neural representation of self and significant others in response to culture primes. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nguyen, A.-M. D., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2007). Biculturalism unpacked: Components, measurement, individual differences, and outcomes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Northoff, G., & Bermpohl, F. (2004). Cortical midline structures and the self. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 102–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Northoff, G., DeGreck, M., Bermpohl, F., & Panksepp, J. (2006). Self-referential processing in our brain – A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. NeuroImage, 31, 440–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W.-S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oyserman, D., & Sorensen, N. (2009). Understanding cultural syndrome effects on what and how we think: A situated cognition model. In R. S. Wyer, C.-Y. Chiu, & Y.-Y. Hong (Eds.), Understanding culture. Theory, research, and application (pp. 25–52). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  56. Phinney, J., & Devich-Navarro, M. (1997). Variations in bicultural identification among African American and Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 7, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pievani, T. (2011). La vita inaspettata [The unexpected life]. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.Google Scholar
  58. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Pouliasi, K., & Verkuyten, M. (2007). Networks of meaning and the bicultural mind: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 955–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Rose, S. (2005). The 21st century brain. London: Cape.Google Scholar
  62. Ross, M., Xun, W. Q. E., & Wilson, A. E. (2002). Language and the bicultural self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1040–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sam, D. L., & Berry, J. W. (2006). Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sato, T., Namiki, H., Ando, J., & Hatano, G. (2004). Japanese conception of and research on intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), International handbook of human intelligence (pp. 302–324). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Semin, G. R., & Echterhoff, G. (Eds.). (2011). Grounding sociality. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  66. Shore, B. (1996). Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, E. E., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2009). Cognitive psychology. Mind and brain. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
  68. Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  69. Tanaka, S., Michimata, C., Kaminaga, T., Honda, M., & Sadato, N. (2002). Superior digit memory of abacus experts: An event-related functional MRI study. NeuroReport, 13(17), 2187–2191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tang, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, K., et al. (2006). Arithmetic processing in the brain shaped by cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(28), 10775–10780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animal and men. New York: Century.Google Scholar
  72. Verkuyten, M., & Pouliasi, K. (2002). Biculturalism among older children: Cultural frame switching, attributions, self-identification, and attitudes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 596–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wexler, B. E. (2006). Brain and culture: Neurobiology, ideology, and social change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  74. Wong, R. Y.-M., & Hong, Y. (2005). Dynamic influences of culture on cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma. Psychological Science, 16, 429–434.Google Scholar
  75. Young, L., Giles, H., & Pierson, H. (1986). Sociopolitical change and perceived vitality. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 459–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhou, H., & Cacioppo, J. (2010). Culture and the brain: Opportunities and obstacles. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. (2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self representation. NeuroImage, 34, 1310–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.“Riccardo Massa” Department of Educational Human SciencesUniversity of Milano - BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations