Advertisement

The Diffusion of a Museum Exhibit: The Case of the Transparent Man

  • Elena Canadelli
Chapter

Abstract

The essay focuses on the phenomenon of health exhibitions that arose in the second half of the nineteenth century and exploded between 1910 and 1940, with a peak in the 1930s. Leading this trend was the experience of the Deutsches Hygiene-Museum, established in Dresden in 1912. It was relevant for pedagogical practice and for the novelty of the installations, later exported to the rest of Europe and above all to the United States. The exhibit symbolizing the Dresden Museum was the Transparent Man, a translucent life-size statue-model, made in plastic materials by Franz Tschakert, and exhibited for the first time at the opening of the second International Hygiene Exhibition in Dresden in 1930. It was displayed in the new building of the Museum that was opened on the occasion. This attractive and interactive medium was built for exhibition and educational purposes and it was soon followed by the Transparent Woman. The Transparent Man became ambassador of German health education all round the world. The transfer and migration of this popular reproducible science display from one country to another with largely different political connotations, allows to trace the diffusion dynamics of a specific cultural trait regarding the human body and its management. After the Chicago World’s Fair of 1933 and during the 1930s, the Transparent Man spread in the U.S. through traveling exhibitions, science museums and world’s fairs. The Transparent Man survived the falling of the National-Socialist ideology and gradually became an historical artifact.

Keywords

Health museums Transparent Man Human body Health education 

References

  1. (1935). Wonders of the human body reproduced in museum by machines and electricity. Popular Science Monthly, 127, 36–37, 96.Google Scholar
  2. (1936). Health exhibit: New York world’s fair of 1939. California and Western Medicine, 45, 375.Google Scholar
  3. (1938). Scientific peep show tells how our bodies work. Popular Science Monthly, 132, 54–55.Google Scholar
  4. (1950). Das grösste Wunder. Der Spiegel, 32, 44.Google Scholar
  5. (1955). An inside job on a big maw: A plaster head gets a checkup. Life, 38, n. 17, 99–100.Google Scholar
  6. Abbott, M. E. (1930). Book review – The medical museum. The Canadian Medical Association Journal, 22, 310.Google Scholar
  7. Beier, R., & Roth, M. (Eds.). (1991). Der gläserne Mensch. Eine Sensation: zur Kulturgeschichte eines Ausstellungsobjekts. Stuttgart: Verlag Gerd Hatje.Google Scholar
  8. Canadelli, E. (2011). “Scientific peep show”: The human body in contemporary science museums. Nuncius, 26, 159–184. doi: 10.1163/182539111X569801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clair, J. (Ed.). (2008). The 1930s: The making of the “new man”. Ottawa: National Gallery of Canada.Google Scholar
  10. Cogdell, C. (2004). Eugenic design: Streamlining America in the 1930s. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  11. Committee on American Museum of Hygiene. (1937). Seventh Annual Year Book. Supplement to American Journal of Public Health, 27, 38–40.Google Scholar
  12. de Ceglia, F. P. (2013). Mostre di cadaveri e nuova visibilità della morte. Il caso di Gunther von Hagens. In F. P. de Ceglia & L. Dibattista (Eds.), Il bello della scienza. Intersezioni tra storia, scienza e arte (pp. 11–28). Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  13. Dublin, L. I., & Calver, H. N. (1938). Health education for the millions. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation’s Health, 28, 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunham, G. C. (1931). The International hygiene exhibition. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation’s Health, 21, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans, A. D. (2008). Race made visible: The transformation of museum exhibits in early-twentieth-century German anthropology. German Studies Review, 31, 87–108.Google Scholar
  16. Gebhard, B. (1934). Health education in Germany. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation’s Health, 24, 1148–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gebhard, B. (1940). Health exhibits. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation’s Health, 30, 657–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gebhard, B. (1945). Art and science in a health museum. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 33, 39–49.Google Scholar
  19. Gebhard, B. (1946). What good are health museums? American Journal of Public Health and the Nation’s Health, 36, 1012–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goeller, A. (2007). Interior landscapes: Anatomy art and the work of Gunter von Hagens. In K. Kutzback & M. Mueller (Eds.), The abject of desire: The aestheticization of the unaesthetic in contemporary literature and culture (pp. 271–290). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  21. Hau, M. (2003). The cult of health and beauty in Germany: A social history 1890–1930. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hirschauer, S. (2006). Animated corpses: Communicating with post mortals in an anatomical exhibition. Body & Society, 12, 25–52. doi: 10.1177/1357034X06070883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kinkel, M. (2011). Races of mankind. The sculptures of Malvina Hoffman. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kleinschmidt, H. E. (1935). New Germany teaches her people: An account of the Health Exposition of Berlin. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation’s Health, 25, 1108–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kühl, S. (1994). The Nazi connection: Eugenics, American racism, and German National Socialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. McLeary, E., & Toon, E. (2012). Here man learns about himself. Visual education and the rise and fall of the American Museum of Health. American Journal of Public Health, 102, e27–e36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Niquette, M., & Buxton, W. J. (2009). “Sugar-coating the educational pill”: Rockefeller support for the communicative turn in science museum. In W. J. Buxton (Ed.), Patronizing the public: American philantropy’s transformation of culture, communications and the humanities (pp. 153–193). Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  28. Reichardt, E. (2008). Health, ‘race’ and empire: Popular-scientific spectacles and national identity in Imperial Germany, 1871–1914. Raleigh: Lulu.com.Google Scholar
  29. Rydell, R., Cogdell, C., & Largent, M. (2006). The Nazi eugenics exhibit in the United States, 1934–43. In S. Currel & C. Cogdell (Eds.), Popular eugenics: National efficiency and American mass culture in the 1930s (pp. 359–384). Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Schrön, J. (2003). Ein ‘grosses, lebendiges Lehrbuch der Hygiene’. Die Internationale Hygiene-Ausstellung in Dresden 1911. In C. Kretschmann (Ed.), Wissenspopularisierung. Konzepte der Wissensverbreitung im Wandel (pp. 309–322). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
  31. Stillwell, D. (2012). Eugenics visualized: The exhibit of the third International Congress of Eugenics, 1932. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 86, 206–236. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2012.0025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tymkiw, M. (2015). Den Körper spielerisch erkunden. Die Ausstellung Wunder des Lebens in Berlin 1935 und ihr Nachleben. In S. Nikolow (Ed.), Erkenne Dich selbst! Strategien der Sichtbarmachung des Körpers im 20. Jahrhundert (pp. 320-342). Köln: Böhlau.Google Scholar
  33. Vogel, K. (1999). The transparent man: Some comments on the history of a symbol. In R. Bud, B. Finn, & H. Trischler (Eds.), Manifesting medicine: Bodies and machines (pp. 31–61). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Vogel, K. (Ed.). (2003). Das Deutsche Hygiene-Museum Dresden 1911–1990. Dresden: Stiftung Deutsches Hygiene-Museum Dresden.Google Scholar
  35. Weindling, P. (1989). Health, race, and German politics between National Unification and Nazism 1870–1945. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of PaduaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations