Advertisement

Concluding Remarks

Removing Barriers in Scientific Research: Concepts, Synthesis and Catalysis
  • Emanuele SerrelliEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This paper concludes a book on ‘cultural traits’ which features 20 contributions from the most diverse disciplines, from cultural anthropology to archaeology, from psychology to history, from economics to musicology. The paper dodges the attempt to make a conceptual synthesis, arguing positively for such avoidance. Borrowing a term from the U.S. National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, the paper likens the book, Understanding Cultural Traits, to a catalysis meeting, i.e., a lowering of disciplinary barriers that influences the disciplines’ culture of data, broadens the scientific vision, and generates scientific collaborations. Catalysis is not alternative to synthesis. It is a different phase of scientific progress, one that can be hindered by an obsession for concepts and by an urge to close the discourse.

Keywords

Synthesis Interdisciplinarity Scientific concepts Conceptual analysis Cultural traits 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank all NESCent leaders and staff, in particular Allen Rodrigo and Joel Kingsolver, for their great generosity in letting me interview them. My research on NESCent, synthesis and catalysis was supported by the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent), NSF grant #EF-0423641.

References

  1. Brigandt, I., & Love, A. C. (2010). Evolutionary novelty and the evo-devo synthesis: Field notes. Evolutionary Biology, 37(2–3), 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Craver, C. (2009). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cunningham, C. (2005). The right time for synthesis in evolutionary biology. BioScience, 55(2), 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kingsolver, J. (2014). Interview to Emanuele Serrelli. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  5. Mitchell, S. (2003). Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. NESCent. (2004). A place for evolutionary synthesis in North Carolina’s Research Triangle. Original grant proposal to NSF [not online, courtesy of Jory Weintraub and Cliff Cunningham].Google Scholar
  7. Rodrigo, A. (2014). Interview to Emanuele Serrelli. Durham: NESCent.Google Scholar
  8. Rodrigo, A., et al. (2013). Science incubators: Synthesis centers and their role in the research ecosystem. PLoS Biology, 11(1), p.e1001468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sidlauskas, B., et al. (2009). Linking big: The continuing promise of evolutionary synthesis. Evolution, 64(4), 871–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CISEPS – Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Economics, Psychology and Social SciencesUniversity of Milano - BicoccaMilanItaly
  2. 2.“Riccardo Massa” Department of Educational Human SciencesUniversity of Milano - BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations