Scientific and Technical Challenges to the Effective Implementation of the “3S” (Safety, Security and Safeguards) Approach

  • Said Abousahl
  • Anne Harrington
  • Elina Martikka
  • Tapani Honkamaa
  • Tapani Hack
  • Timo Wiander
  • Marko Hämäläinen
  • Stamatios Tsalas
Conference paper

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24322-1_6

Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 172)
Cite this paper as:
Abousahl S. et al. (2016) Scientific and Technical Challenges to the Effective Implementation of the “3S” (Safety, Security and Safeguards) Approach. In: Maiani L., Abousahl S., Plastino W. (eds) International Cooperation for Enhancing Nuclear Safety, Security, Safeguards and Non-proliferation. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 172. Springer, Cham

Abstract

In the field of nuclear safeguards, the EU supports IAEA State-Level Concept (SLC) as a mechanism for increased efficiency and effective information-based implementation of IAEA safeguards worldwide, when compared to the safeguards approaches targeted on specific facilities only. The EU highlights the potential for developing the SLC further with respect to the specificities of a regional safeguards system, if compared to single-state systems of safeguards.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Said Abousahl
    • 1
  • Anne Harrington
    • 2
  • Elina Martikka
    • 3
  • Tapani Honkamaa
    • 3
  • Tapani Hack
    • 3
  • Timo Wiander
    • 3
  • Marko Hämäläinen
    • 3
  • Stamatios Tsalas
    • 4
  1. 1.European CommissionDirectorate General Joint Research CentreBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security AdministrationWashington, DCUSA
  3. 3.Radiation and Nuclear Safety AuthorityHelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.Directorate-General of the European Commission Energy, EURATOMLuxembourgLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations