A Model to Support Monitoring for Classroom Orchestration in a Tablet-Based CSCL Activity

  • Patrick Wang
  • Pierre Tchounikine
  • Matthieu Quignard
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9307)


The work presented in this article addresses CSCL settings in which students work with tablets in classrooms. The objective is to study how to equip teachers with tablets to monitor students’ progress and intervene when required. We propose a model that provides teachers with both quantitative and qualitative run-time feedback based on the students’ progress. An implementation of this model was tested in the context of an activity called negotiated dictation. The results suggest that the model and associated tools are easy for teachers to use and allow them to satisfactorily monitor the progress of both the class and individual students or groups.


Classroom orchestration Monitoring CSCL activities Quantitative and qualitative progress Tablets 



This work is partially funded by the ARC6 action of the Rhône Alpes region (France).


  1. 1.
    Dillenbourg, P.: Design for classroom orchestration. Comput. Educ. 69, 485–492 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kreitmayer, S., Rogers, Y., Laney, R., Peake, S.: Unipad: orchestrating collaborative activities through shared tablets and an integrated wall display. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 801–810. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martinez Maldonado, R., Dimitriadis, Y., Kay, J., Yacef, K., Edbauer, M.T.: Orchestrating a multi-tabletop classroom: from activity design to enactment and reflection. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 119–128. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prieto, L.P., Dlab, M.H., Gutiérrez, I., Abdulwahed, M., Balid, W.: Orchestrating technology enhanced learning: a literature review and a conceptual framework. Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 3(6), 583–598 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roschelle, J., Dimitriadis, Y., Hoppe, U.: Classroom orchestration: synthesis. Comput. Educ. 69, 523–526 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tchounikine, P.: Computer Science and Educational Software Design. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tchounikine, P.: Clarifying design for orchestration: orchestration and orchestrable technology, scripting and conducting. Comput. Educ. 69, 500–503 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, P., Tchounikine, P., Quignard, M.: Orchestration issues raised by transposing an individual paper-based activity into a tablet-based CSCL activity: an example. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS) (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zurita, G., Nussbaum, M.: Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Comput. Educ. 42(3), 289–314 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Wang
    • 1
  • Pierre Tchounikine
    • 1
  • Matthieu Quignard
    • 2
  1. 1.Université Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.CNRSICARLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations