Advertisement

VisEN: Motivating Learner Engagement Through Explorable Visual Narratives

  • Bilal Yousuf
  • Owen Conlan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9307)

Abstract

Visualizations are increasingly being used to present student interactions and progress with online learning environments as motivations for student engagement with course content. Specifically, visualizations supporting data exploration and peer comparisons have yielded positive results in engagement. In addition, visual narratives have recently started to be used in learning environments to engage learners. This paper introduces VisEN, a visualization framework for semi-automatically constructing explorable visual narratives. VisEN was used during two successive academic years to construct individualized explorable visual narratives for undergraduate learners participating in an online Information Management course. The narratives presented engagement scores, time spent on activities and peer comparisons. This research evaluates the impact the explorable visual narratives had on student course engagement. This paper shows that the explorable visual narratives encouraged the majority of students (that were engaging poorly with course content) to engage with assigned tasks, and subsequently these students improved their engagement levels.

Keywords

Visual narratives Learner engagement Visual exploration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Science Foundation Ireland through the CNGL program (Grant 12/CE/I2267) in the ADAPT Center (www.adaptcentre.ie) at Trinity College Dublin.

References

  1. 1.
    Koutropoulos, A., Gallagher, M., Abajian, S., de Waard, I., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Rodriguez, C.: Emotive vocabulary in MOOCs: context and participant retention. Eur. J. Open Distance E-Learn., 1 (2012). http://www.eurodl.org/?article=507
  2. 2.
    Duval, E.: Attention please!: learning analytics for visualization and recommendation. In: 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 9–17. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Card, S., Mackinlay, J., Shneiderman, B.: Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gonzalez, H., Halevy, A., Jensen, C.S., Langen, A., Madhavan, J., Shapley, R., Shen, W.: Google fusion tables: data management, integration and collaboration in the cloud. In: 1st ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, pp. 175–180. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tableau Software: http://www.tableau.com
  6. 6.
    Zimmerman, B.J.: Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theor. Pract. 41(2), 65–70 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Austin, M.: Useful Fictions: Evolution, Anxiety, and the Origins of Literature. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kosara, R., Mackinlay, J.: Storytelling: the next step for visualization. Computer 46, 44–50 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keim, D.A.: Visual exploration of large data sets. Commun. ACM 44, 38–44 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tibco Spotfire: http://spotfire.tibco.com
  11. 11.
    O’Keeffe, I., Staikopoulos, A., Rafter, R., Walsh, E., Yousuf, B., Conlan, O., Wade, V.: Personalized activity based eLearning. In: 12th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, Article no. 2. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burleson, K., Leach, C.W., Harrington, D.M.: Upward social comparison and self-concept: Inspiration and inferiority among art students in an advanced programme. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 44(1), 109–123 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    May, M., George, S., Prévôt, P.: TrAVis to enhance students’ self-monitoring in online learning supported by computer-mediated communication tools. Comput. Inf. Syst. Ind. Manage. Appl. 3, 623–634 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carr, D.B., Littlefield, R.J., Nicholson, W.L., Littlefield, J.S.: Scatterplot matrix techniques for large N. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82, 424–436 (1987)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dias, M.M., Franco, C., Rabelo, E., Yamaguchi, J.K.: Visualization Techniques: Which is the Most Appropriate in the Process of Knowledge Discovery in Data Base?. INTECH Open Access Publisher, Rijeka (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Govaerts, S., Verbert, K., Duval, E., Pardo, A.: The student activity meter for awareness and self-reflection. In: CHI 2012 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 869–884. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Santos, J.L., Govaerts, S., Verbert, K., Duval, E.: Goal-oriented visualizations of activity tracking: a case study with engineering students. In: 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 143–152. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hullman, J., Drucker, S., Riche, N.H., Lee, B., Fisher, D., Adar, E.: A deeper understanding of sequence in narrative visualization. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 19, 2406–2415 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grammel, L., Bennett, C., Tory, M., Storey, M.A.: A survey of visualization construction user interfaces. In: EuroVis-Short Papers, pp. 19–23 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chi, E.H.: A taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data state reference model. In: IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pp. 69–75. IEEE (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hsiao, I.-H., Brusilovsky, P.: Motivational social visualizations for personalized E-learning. In: Ravenscroft, A., Lindstaedt, S., Kloos, C.D., Hernández-Leo, D. (eds.) EC-TEL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7563, pp. 153–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Santos, J.L., Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., Duval, E.: Addressing learner issues with StepUp!: an evaluation. In: Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 14–22. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Merceron, A., Yacef, K.: Educational data mining: a case study. In: 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Le, D.T.: Bringing data to life into an introductory statistics course with gapminder. Teach. Stat. 35, 114–122 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, H., Almeroth, K.: Moodog: tracking student activity in online course management systems. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 21, 407–429 (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Popescu, E., Cioiu, D.: eMUSE - integrating web 2.0 tools in a social learning environment. In: Leung, H., Popescu, E., Cao, Y., Lau, R.W.H., Nejdl, W. (eds.) ICWL 2011. LNCS, vol. 7048, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bull, S., Kay, J.: Open learner models as drivers for metacognitive processes. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook on Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer, New York (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Adapt Center, School of Computer Science and StatisticsTrinity College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations