Advertisement

Coflection – Combining Mutual Support and Facilitation in Technology Enhanced Learning

  • Michael PrillaEmail author
  • Carmen Wolf
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9307)

Abstract

Coaching and reflection are established methods for learning from experiences and peer support at work. They support people with different means: While coaching is a rather formal, planned, structured and systematic process, reflection is rather informal, spontaneous and emergent. Despite these differences, coaching and reflection may complement each other. This helps to overcome barriers of the respective other method and closes a gap between formal-systematic and informal-self-organized approaches of learning at work. In this paper we ask how this complement can be supported by tools and describe an intertwined concept of reflection and coaching called “coflection”. We identify challenges associated with this concept, we present a prototype and we explain how the concept may solve problems at work by using real-world scenarios. The paper contributes to TEL by providing a concept that enables transitions between formal and informal learning.

Keywords

Reflection Coaching Coflection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

EmployID (http://employid.eu) “Scalable & cost-effective facilitation of professional identity transformation in public employment services” is a research project supported by the European Commission in the 7th Framework Program (project no. 619619). We would like to thank all colleagues and associated partners in the project for their cooperation and our fruitful discussions.

References

  1. 1.
    Eraut, M.: Informal learning in the workplace. Stud. Continuing Educ. 26, 247–273 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schein, E.H.: Helping: How to Offer, Give, and Receive Help. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giesbrecht, T., Schenk, B., Schwabe, G.: Learning with facilitation affordances: the case of citizens’ advice services. In: Proceedings of the Twenty Second European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2014) (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Littlejohn, A., Milligan, C., Margaryan, A.: Charting collective knowledge: supporting self-regulated learning in the workplace. J. Workplace Learn. 24, 226–238 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prilla, M., Pammer, V., Krogstie, B.: Fostering collaborative redesign of work practice: challenges for tools supporting reflection at work. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2013) (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grant, A.M., Stober, D.R.: Introduction. In: Stober, D.R., Grant, A.M. (eds.). Evidence Based Coaching Handbook. Putting Best Practices To Work For Your Clients. New Hersey, Wiley. pp. 1–19 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boud, D.: Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. Kogan Page, London (1985)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., Fischer, F.: The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. Technology-Enhanced Learning, pp. 3–19. Springer, Berlin (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eraut, M.: Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 70, 113–136 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greif, S.: Coaching und ergebnisorientierte Selbstreflexion: Theorie, Forschung und Praxis des Einzel-und Gruppencoachings. Hogrefe Verlag, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whitmore, J.: Coaching for Performance: Growing Human Potential and Purpose: The Principles and Practice of Coaching and Leadership. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ajdukovic, M., Cajvert, L., Judy, M., Knopf, W., Kuhn, H., Madai, K., Voogd, M.: ECVision. A European Glossary of Supervision and Coaching (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anthony, K., Nagel, D.-A.: A brave new world: coaching online. Coaching Today (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoyrup, S.: Reflection as a core process in organisational learning. J. Workplace Learn. 16, 442–454 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krogstie, B., Prilla, M., Pammer, V.: Understanding and supporting reflective learning processes in the workplace: the RL@Work model. In: Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL-2013) (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baumer, E.P., Khovanskaya, V., Matthews, M., Reynolds, L., Sosik, V.S., Gay, G.K.: Reviewing reflection: on the use of reflection in interactive system design. In: Proceedings of DIS 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marcu, G., Dey, A.K., Kiesler, S.: Designing for collaborative reflection. In: Proceedings of PervasiveHealth 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Daudelin, M.W.: Learning from experience through reflection. Organ. Dyn. 24, 36–48 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cressey, P., Boud, D., Docherty, P.: Productive reflection at work. In: Boud, D., Cressey, P., Docherty, P. (eds.) Productive Reflection at Work: Learning for Changing Organizations, pp. 11–26. Routledge, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scott, S.G.: Enhancing reflection skills through learning portfolios: an empirical test. J. Manag. Educ. 34, 430–457 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prilla, M., Degeling, M., Herrmann, T.: Collaborative reflection at work: supporting informal learning at a healthcare workplace. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP 2012), pp. 55–64 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fleck, R., Fitzpatrick, G.: Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 216–223. ACM, Brisbane, Australia (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Davis, E.A.: Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 22, 819–837 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roschelle, J., Teasley, S.: The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In: O’Malley, C. (ed.) Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 69–97. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S.: Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity. In: HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 10–19 (1999)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maynard, D.W.: Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Delvaux, N., Merckaert, I., Marchal, S., Libert, Y., Conradt, S., Boniver, J., Etienne, A.-M., Fontaine, O., Janne, P., Klastersky, J., Mélot, C., Reynaert, C., Scalliet, P., Slachmuylder, J.-L., Razavi, D.: Physicians’ communication with a cancer patient and a relative. Cancer 103, 2397–2411 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bimrose, J., Brown, A., Holocher-Ertl, T., Kieslinger, B., Kunzmann, C., Prilla, M., Schmidt, A.P., Wolf, C.: The role of facilitation in technology-enhanced learning for public employment services. Int. J. Adv. Corp. Learn. (iJAC) 7(3), 56 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Valero, P.: Deliberative mathematics education for social democratization in Latin America. ZDM Math. Educ. 31, 20–26 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Crockett, M.D., Buckley, L.A.: The role of coflection in equity-centered mathematics professional development practices. Equity Excellence Educ. 42, 169–182 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Prilla, M., Blunk, O.: Reflective TEL: augmenting learning tools with reflection support. In: Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. Springer, Berlin (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dillenbourg, P.: Over-scripting CSCL: the risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In: Kirschner, P. (ed.) Three Worlds of CSCL: Can We Support CSCL, pp. 61–91. Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen (2002)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hrastinski, S.: Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Q. 31, 51–55 (2008)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stahl, G.: Theories of cognition in CSCW. In: ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24–28 September 2011, Aarhus Denmark, pp. 193–212 (2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    May, G.L., Short, D.: Gardening in cyberspace: a metaphor to enhance online teaching and learning. J. Manag. Educ. 27, 673–693 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fischer, G., Herrmann, T.: Socio-technical systems: a meta-design perspective. Int. J. Sociotechnol. Knowl. Dev. 3, 1–33 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ruhr University of BochumBochumGermany
  2. 2.Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations