On the Road to an Electric Mobility Mass Market—How Can Early Adopters be Characterized?

  • Axel Ensslen
  • Alexandra-Gwyn Paetz
  • Sonja Babrowski
  • Patrick Jochem
  • Wolf Fichtner
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mobility book series (LNMOB)

Abstract

Different field trials and corresponding acceptance studies with new technologies were carried out between 2010 and 2013 at the Chair of Energy Economics at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). Those involved Electric Vehicle (EV) users, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) vehicle users as well as persons with strong interest in EV and smart energy home technologies. In order to characterize early adopters the same item-sets concerning attitudes regarding climate change, prices and innovations as well as corresponding socio-demographic characteristics were used throughout all these studies. Survey datasets originating from these studies are joined to be analyzed together. Regression methods are applied in order to characterize early EV adopters based on a subsample of EV company car users in the French-German context. A binary logistic regression model explaining private EV purchase intentions is developed. According to this model, early private EV adopters are likely to have a higher level of income, to have a household equipped with two or more cars and to travel more than 50 km a day, not necessarily by car. This model additionally shows that possibilities to experience EV (e.g. by test drives) are important leverages to support adoption of EV by private car buyers. Respondents who already decided to privately purchase an EV show significantly lower general price sensitivities than the LPG and CNG vehicle users.

Keywords

Electric vehicle Electric mobility Early adopter User acceptance User experience EV diffusion 

References

  1. Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R (2008) Multivariate Analysemethoden. Springer, HeidelbergMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamberg S, Möser G (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of proenvironmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol 27:14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bass FM (2004) Comments on a new product growth for model consumer durables the bass model. Manage Sci 50:1833–1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BMVBS (Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung) (2011) Elektromoblilität—Deutschland als Leitmarkt und Leitanbieter. http://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/DE/Publikationen/VerkehrUndMobilitaet/elektromobilitaet-deutschland-als-leitmarkt-und-leitanbieter.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Accessed 6 March 2014
  5. Bundesnetzagentur (2011) „Smart Grid“ und „Smart Market“: Eckpunktepapier der Bundesnetzagentur zu den Aspekten des sich verändernden Energieversorgungssystems. http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Energie/Unternehmen_Institutionen/NetzzugangUndMesswesen/SmartGridEckpunktepapier/SmartGridPapierpdf.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2%20. Accessed 6 March 2014
  6. Bundesregierung (2009) Nationaler Entwicklungsplan Elektromobilität der Bundesregierung. http://www.bmbf.de/pubRD/nationaler_entwicklungsplan_elektromobilitaet.pdf. Accessed 6 March 2014
  7. Dütschke E, Schneider U, Peters A, Paetz A, Jochem P (2011) Moving towards more efficient car use—what can be learnt about consumer acceptance from analysing the cases of LPG and CNG. ECEEE 2011 Summer StudyGoogle Scholar
  8. Dütschke E, Schneider U, Peters A (2013) Who will use electric vehicles?. Working paper sustainability and innovation No. S 6/2013. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI). http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-media/docs/e-x/working-papers-sustainability-and-innovation/WP06-2013_Electric_Vehicles.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2014
  9. Dunn OJ (1964) Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eckl-Dorna W, Sorge N-V (2013) Elektroauto-Markt wächst exponentiell, nicht linear. Interview with Kagermann, Henning. Manager magazin online 2013. http://www.manager-magazin.de/unternehmen/autoindustrie/a-901804.html. Accessed 12 July 2013
  11. Ensslen A, Babrowski S, Jochem P, Fichtner W (2012) Existe-il des différences d’acceptation des véhicules électriques entre la France et l’Allemagne? – Premiers résultats de l’analyse scientifique du test de flotte Cross Border Mobility for Electric Vehicles (CROME). Proceedings of the 11ème séminaire francophone est-ouest de socio-économie des transports, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  12. Ensslen A, Jochem P, Schäuble J, Babrowski S, Fichtner W (2013a) User acceptance of electric vehicles in the French-German transnational context, in selected proceedings of the 13th WCTR, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  13. Ensslen A, Jochem P, Fichtner W (2013b) Experiences of EV users in the French-German context. In: Proceedings of EVS27-conference, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  14. Eurostat (2013a) Umwelt und Energie Datenbank. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/climate_change/data/main_tables. Accessed 18 Sept 2013
  15. Eurostat (2013b) Energy price statistics. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Energy_price_statistics. Accessed 25 June 2013
  16. European Commission (2011) A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/roadmap/documentation_en.htm. Accessed 3 March 2014
  17. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI) (2012) REM2030 Driving Profiles Database V2012Google Scholar
  18. Frenzel I, Jarass J, Trommer S, Lenz B (2015) Erstnutzer von Elektrofahrzeugen in Deutschland. Nutzerprofile, Anschaffung, Fahrzeugnutzung. Berlin: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR)Google Scholar
  19. Glerum A, Stankovikj L, Thémans M, Bierlaire M (2013) Forecasting the demand for electric vehicles: accounting for attitudes and perceptions. Transportation Science, Articles in Advance, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  20. Hackbarth A, Madlener R (2013) Consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles: a discrete choice analysis. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 25:5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hartung J, Elpelt B, Klösener K-H (2005) Statistik. Oldenbourg, MünchenMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. IBM SPSS Statistics (2013a) Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance (nonparametric tests algorithms). http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/spssstat/v21r0m0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.spss.statistics.help%2Falg_npar_tests_kruskalwallis.htm. Accessed 18 Sept 2013
  23. IBM SPSS Statistics (2012) Post hoc comparisons for the Kruskal-Wallis test. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21477370. Accessed 22 Oct 2013
  24. Jochem P, Kaschub T, Fichtner W (2013) How to integrate electric vehicles in the future energy system? In: Hülsmann M, Fornahl D (eds) Evolutionary paths towards the mobility patterns of the future. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  25. KBA—Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt (2014) Jahresbilanz des Fahrzeugbestandes am 1. Januar 2014. http://www.kba.de/cln_031/nn_125398/DE/Statistik/Fahrzeuge/Bestand/2014__b__jahresbilanz.html#rechts. Accessed 19 March 2014
  26. Kay D, Hill N, Newman D (2013) Powering Ahead—The future of low-carbon cars and fuels. http://www.theengineer.co.uk/Journals/2013/04/22/i/k/h/powering_ahead-kay_et_al-apr2013-embargoed_copy.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2014
  27. Kuckartz U, Rädiker S, Rheingans-Heintze A (2006) Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland. Marburg. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/umweltbewusstsein-in-deutschland-2006. Accessed 10 March 2014
  28. Lichtenstein D, Ridgway N, Netemeyer R (1993) Price perception scales. In: Bearden W, Netemeyer R, Haws K (2011) Handbook of marketing scales. SAGE Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  29. Mabit SL, Fosgerau M (2011) Demand for alternative-fuel vehicles when registration taxes are high. Trans Res D 16:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manning K, Bearden W, Madden T (1995) Innovativeness: consumer innovativeness. In: Bearden W, Netemeyer R, Haws K (2011) Handbook of marketing scales. SAGE Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  31. Mendes Lopes M, Moura F, Martinez LM (2014) A rule-based approach for determining the plausible universe of electric vehicle buyers in the lisbon metropolitan area. Transp Res Part A 59:22–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MOP (2012) Mobilitätspanel Deutschland (MOP). http://www.clearingstelle-verkehr.de. Accedded 7 March 2013
  33. Paetz AG, Dütschke E (2012) Auf dem Weg in die elektromobile Zukunft - Ein Zwischenfazit zur Elektromobilität im Alltag. SIV. news 1:45–47Google Scholar
  34. Paetz A-G, Kaschub T, Jochem P, Fichtner W (2012a) Demand response with smart homes and electric scooters: an experimental study on user acceptance. http://www.aceee.org/files/proceedings/2012/data/papers/0193-000232.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2014
  35. Paetz A-G, Jochem P, Fichtner W (2012b) Demand Side Management mit Elektrofahrzeugen – Ausgestaltungsmöglichkeiten und Kundenakzeptanz. 12th Symposium Energieinnovation. Graz, Austria. http://portal.tugraz.at/portal/page/portal/Files/i4340/eninnov2012/files/lf/LF_Paetz.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2014
  36. Paetz A-G, Kaschub T, Pfriem M, Jochem P, Fichtner W, Gauterin F (2013) Is electric mobility a means for more sustainability?. In: Behavior, energy and climate change conference, Nov 2013, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  37. Parasuraman A (2000) The technology readiness index. In: Bearden W, Netemeyer R, Haws K (2011) Handbook of Marketing Scales. SAGE Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  38. Peters A, Dütschke E (2010) Zur Nutzerakzeptanz von Elektromobilität. Analyse aus Expertensicht. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI). http://publica.fraunhofer.de/eprints/urn:nbn:de:0011-n-1450132.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2014
  39. Peters A, Hoffmann J (2011) Nutzerakzeptanz von Elektromobilität. Eine empirische Studie zu attraktiven Nutzungsvarianten, Fahrzeugkonzepten und Geschäftsmodellen aus Sicht potenzieller Nutzer. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI). http://isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-media/docs/service/de/presseinfos/Forschungsergebnisse_Nutzerakzeptanz_Elektromobilitaet.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2014
  40. Peters A, Popp M, Agosti R, Ryf B (2011a) Electric mobility—a survey of different consumer groups in Germany with regard to adoption. ECEEE Summer Study proceedings. http://publica.fraunhofer.de/eprints/urn:nbn:de:0011-n-1834806.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2014
  41. Peters A, Gutscher H, Scholz RW (2011b) Psychological determinants of fuel consumption of purchased new cars. Transp Res Part F Psychol Behav 14:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peters A, de Haan P, Scholz W (2013) Understanding car buying behavior: psychological determinants of energy efficiency and practical implications. Int J Sustain Transp doi:10.1080/15568318.2012.732672
  43. Pfahl S (2013) When will electric vehicles capture the German market? And why? In: Proceedings of EVS27-conference, Barcelona, Spain Google Scholar
  44. Plötz P, Schneider U, Globisch J, Dütschke E (2014) Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 67:96–109, doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.006
  45. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. SINUS (2012) Klimaschutz in Heidelberg. http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/md/journal/2013/02/14jan_heidelbergstudie_2012.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2014
  47. Thielmann A, Sauer A, Isenmann R, Wietschel M, Plötz P (2012) Produkt-Roadmap Lithium-Ionen-Batterien 2030. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI). http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-media/docs/v/de/publikationen/PRM-LIB2030.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2014
  48. Waraich RA, Galus MD, Dobler C, Balmer M, Andersson G, Axhausen KW (2013) Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and smart grids: investigations based on a microsimulation. Transp Res Part C 28:74–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wietschel M, Dütschke E, Funke S, Peters A, Plötz P, Schneider U (2012) Kaufpotenzial für Elektrofahrzeuge bei sogenannten „Early Adoptern“. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI). http://isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-media/docs/e/de/publikationen/Schlussbericht_Early_Adopter.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2014
  50. Wietschel M, Plötz P, Kühn A, Gnann T (2013) Markthochlaufszenarien für Elektrofahrzeuge. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI). http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-media/docs/e/de/publikationen/Fraunhofer-ISI-Markthochlaufszenarien-Elektrofahrzeuge-Langfassung.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2014
  51. Windisch E (2013) Driving electric? A financial assessment of electric vehicle policies in France. ParisGoogle Scholar
  52. Ziegler A (2012) Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: a discrete choice analysis for Germany. Transp Res A 46:1372–1385Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Axel Ensslen
    • 1
  • Alexandra-Gwyn Paetz
    • 1
  • Sonja Babrowski
    • 1
  • Patrick Jochem
    • 1
  • Wolf Fichtner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Industrial Production – Chair of Energy EconomicsKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations