Servaqua: Towards a Model for Service Quality in Potable Reticulated Water Services

  • Peter Prevos
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science book series (DMSPAMS)


The purpose of this paper is to propose a conceptual model for total service quality in the provision of networked technological services, dominated by tangible elements, with specific reference to reticulated water for customers in urban environments. A range of methods to measure the level of service provided by water utilities exists, most of which focus on the intrinsic quality of water supply, measured from the perspective of the service provider. These methodologies largely omit the quality of service as experienced by the customer, limiting their ability to drive customer centric management. A conceptual model is derived from a synthesis of literature on services quality. The face and content validity of the model are assessed using a qualitative case-study approach in which the views of organisations representing customers in this industry were sought. It was found that existing service quality methodologies cannot account for the specific context of water services, a service with high tangibility and low customer interaction. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research into this problem.


Service Provider Service Quality Water Utility Technical Quality Water Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdullah, F. (2005). HEdPERF versus SERVPERF: The quest for ideal measuring instrument of service quality in higher education sector. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(4), 305-328. doi:10.1108/09684880510626584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babakus, E. (1993). Measuring service quality in the public utilities. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 1(1), 33-49. doi:10.1300/J054v01n01_04CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babakus, E., & Boller, G. W. (1992). An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Business research, 24(3), 253-268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75(299), 493-517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg, S. V. (2010). Water Utility Benchmarking: Measurement, Methodologies and Performance Incentives. London: IWA Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Braadbaart, O. (2007). Collaborative benchmarking, transparency and performance: Evidence from The Netherlands water supply industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 14(6), 677-692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brogowicz, A. A., Delene, L. M., & Lyth, D. M. (1990). A synthesised service quality model with managerial implications. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 1(1), 27-45. doi:10.1108/09564239010001640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burns, A. C., & Bush, R. F. (2010). Marketing research. Upper Saddle River, N.J.; London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Buttle, F. (1996). SERVQUAL: Review, critique, research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 30(1), 8-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cabrera, E. (2011). Benchmarking Water Services: Guiding Water Utilities to Excellence. London: IWA Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Carrillat, F. A., Jaramillo, F., & Mulki, J. P. (2007). The validity of the SERVQUAL and SERVPERF scales: A meta-analytic view of 17 years of research across five continents. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18(5), 472-490. doi:10.1108/09564230710826250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 60-64.Google Scholar
  13. Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, B. (2002). LibQUAL+ One instrument in the new measures toolbox. Journal of Library Administration, 35(4), 41-46. doi:10.1300/J111v35n04_09CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davies, G., & Omer, O. (1996). Time allocation and marketing. Time & Society, 5(2), 253-268. doi:10.1177/0961463X96005002007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DiLorenzo, T. J. (1996). The myth of natural monopoly. The Review of Austrian Economics, 9(2), 43-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dul, J., & Hak, T. (2008). Case Study Methodology in Business Research. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532.Google Scholar
  18. Flynn, N. (1990). Public sector management. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  19. George, M. L. (2003). Lean Six Sigma for Service How to Use Lean Speed and Six Sigma Quality to Improve Services and Transactions. New York; London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Grigg, N. S. (2012). Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Infrastructure Management (2nd ed.). International Water Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36-44. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000004784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grönroos, C. (1990). Service management and marketing: Managing the moments of truth in service competition. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  23. Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238-247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang, R. (2012). RQDA: R-based Qualitative Data Analysis. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  25. Karbowiak, P. (2003). Marketing a technical business. Water Supply, 3(1-2), 433-440.Google Scholar
  26. Kot, M., Castleden, H., & Gagnon, G. A. (2011). Unintended consequences of regulating drinking water in rural Canadian communities: Examples from Atlantic Canada. Health & Place, 17(5), 1030-1037. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, N., & Lings, I. (2008). Doing business research: A guide to theory and practice. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  28. Liamputtong, P., & Eddy, D. (2005). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lovelock, C. H. (1992). Cultivating the Flower of Service: New ways of looking at core and supplementary services. In P. Eiglier & E. Langeard (Eds.), Marketing, Operations, and Human Resources: Insights into Services (pp. 296–316). Aix-en-Provence, France: IAE, Université d’Aix-Marseille III.Google Scholar
  30. Meyer, C. B. (2001). A case in case study methodology. Field Methods, 13(4), 329-352. doi:10.1177/1525822X0101300402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.Google Scholar
  32. Prevos, P. (2012). The Invisible Water Corporation. Presented at the VicWater Conference, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  33. R Core Team. (2012). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  34. Rushton, A. M., & Carson, D. J. (1985). The marketing of services: Managing the intangibles. European Journal of Marketing, 19(3), 19-40. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000004748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmenner, R. W. (1986). How can service businesses survive and prosper? Sloan Management Review, 27(3), 21-32.Google Scholar
  36. Turner, S. P. (1979). The concept of face validity. Quality and Quantity, 13(1), 85-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vloerbergh, I., Fife-Schaw, C., Kelay, T., Jonathan Chenoweth, Morrison, G., & Lundéhn, C. (2007). Assessing consumer preferences for drinking water services. Methods for water utilities. Techneau.Google Scholar
  38. Walker, R. H., & Johnson, L. W. (2009). Signalling intrinsic service quality and value via accreditation and certification. Managing Service Quality, 19(1), 85-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams, R. F. G., & Mountjoy, N. (2012). Seeing water in a spatial and temporal perspective: the residential demand for water in regional Victoria. Presented at the 41th Conference of Economists, Melbourne, Australia: School of Economics, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.Google Scholar
  40. Zeithaml, V., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1993). The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 21(1), 1-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zetland, D. (2011). The End of Abundance: Economic Solutions to Water Scarcity. Amsterdam and Mission Viejo: Aguanomics Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Prevos
    • 1
  1. 1.La Trobe UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations