Teachers and the Quality of Education: Why Resilience Counts Most in Testing Times

Chapter
Part of the Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education book series (PROD, volume 13)

Abstract

Over the last 20 years, schools in all countries have been subject to a plethora of government reforms. All of these have been designed primarily for three purposes: (i) to devolve the responsibility of governing schools from central government to the municipalities and schools themselves. Such devolution has been accompanied, however, by increased emphasis upon and accountabilities for raising standards of pupil progress and achievement as defined by central government; (ii) to re-align teacher pre-service education from what has been perceived to be an over-reliance on theory to a greater reliance upon learning through experience of school-based practice; and (iii) to provide an increased focus on equity in order to ‘narrow’ or ‘close’ the gap in achievement between pupils between from socio-economically disadvantaged communities and those from more socio-economically advantaged communities. Whilst the pace of change varies between countries, the direction is the same and is promoted through, for example, the increasing globally influential work of OECD. It is not the purpose of this chapter to analyse the reforms themselves, to support or oppose them. Academics continue to provide research results which do both! Rather, the chapter will focus upon the lives of teachers whose work takes place in the contexts of such persisting reform contexts. It will suggest that teaching itself is both intellectual and emotional work which is characterised by risk, uncertainty and vulnerability; and that reform intensive environments of externally generated change demands, may be seen as creating additional needs for reserves of individual and organizational resilience rather than necessarily resulting in teachers, even those teachers who are the most vocationally oriented and who have the greatest commitment to their work, becoming ‘victims’. To respond positively in principled ways, to bring their ‘best selves’ to their work as professionals in order to meet and mediate these challenges, ‘everyday resilience’ (Day C, Resilient leaders, resilient schools. National College for School Leadership, Nottingham, 2012; Day C, Gu Q, Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. Routledge, London, 2014), founded on a strong sense of moral purpose, is needed.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  2. Benard, B. (2004). Resiliency: What we have learned. San Francisco: WestEd.Google Scholar
  3. Barbalet, J. (2002). Emotions and sociology. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Beard, K. S., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2010). Academic optimism of individual teachers, confirming a new construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1136–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. L. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Cherniss, C. (2000, April). Emotional intelligence (EI): What it is and why it matters. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the society for industrial and organizational psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  7. Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  8. Day, C. (2012). Resilient leaders, resilient schools. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  9. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Day, C., & Lee, J. C. H. (2011). New understandings of teacher’s work: Emotions and educational change. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Day, C., Sammons, P., Stobart, G., Kington, A., & Gu, Q. (2007a). Teachers matter: Connecting work, lives and effectiveness. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., Penlington, C., Mehta, P., & Kington, A. (2007b). The impact of leadership on pupil outcomes: Interim report (DCSF Research Report RR018). Nottingham: Department for Children, Schools and Families & National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  14. Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., et al. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. London: Department for Children Schools and Families.Google Scholar
  15. Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Gu, Q., Brown, E., & Ahtaridou, E. (2011). School leadership and student outcomes: Building and sustaining success. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. ETUCE. (2011). Teachers’ work-related stress: Assessing, comparing and evaluating the impact of psychosocial hazards on teachers at their workplace. Brussels: European Trade Union Committee for Education.Google Scholar
  17. Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367–1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  19. Grotberg, E. (1997). The international resiliency project: Findings from the research and the effectiveness of interventions. In B. Bain et al. (Eds.), Psychology and education in the 21st century: Proceedings of the 54th annual convention of the international convention of psychologists (pp. 118–128). Edmonton: ICPress. Available at: http://resilnet.uiuc.edu/library/grotb97a.html
  20. Hallinger, P. (2010). Developing instructional leadership. In B. Davies & M. Brundett (Eds.), Developing successful leadership (pp. 111–136). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  22. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hong, J. (2010). Pre-service and beginning teachers’ professional identity and its relation to dropping out of the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1530–1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hong, J. (2012). Why do some beginning teachers leave the school, and others stay? Understanding teacher resilience through psychological lenses. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. HSE (Health and Safety Executive). (2000). The scale of occupational stress: A further analysis of the impact of demographic factors and type of job. Retrieved July 9, 2011, from http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2000/crr00311.pdf
  27. HSE. (2011). Stress-related and psychological disorders: Occupation and industry (2007/8–2009/10). Retrieved July 9, 2011, from http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/causdis/stress/occupation.htm
  28. Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Ingersoll, R., & Perda, D. (2011). How high is teacher turnover and is it a problem? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.Google Scholar
  30. Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. M. (2003). The wrong solution to teacher shortages. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 30–33.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, S. M., Berg, J. H., & Donaldson, M. L. (2005). A review of the literature on teacher retention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
  32. Keirstead, J. (1999). Emotional intelligence (EI) in the workplace. Report for the research directorate, policy, research and communications branch, public service commission of Canada. Retrieved March 23, 2004, from http://www.psc-cfp.gc.ca/research/personnel/ei
  33. Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of Inservice Education, 31(2), 221–227.Google Scholar
  34. Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Successful school leadership: What it is and how it influences pupil learning. London: Department for Education and Skills. Available at http://illinoisschoolleader.org/research_compendium/documents/successful_school_leadership.pdf
  35. MacLure, M. (1993). Arguing for your self: Identity as an organising principle in teachers’ jobs and lives. British Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Møller, J. (2005). Chapter 6: Reason and emotion: Coping with accountability. In C. Sugrue (Ed.), Passionate principalship: Learning from life histories of school leaders. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  37. Moos, L., Johansson, O., & Day, C. (Eds.). (2011). How school principals sustain success over time: International perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Müller, K., Alliata, R., & Benninghoff, F. (2009). Attracting and retaining teachers: A question of motivation. http://www.geneve.ch/recherche-education/doc/stat-indicateurs/gpe/documents/ema.pdf
  39. Nash, P. (2005, April 21). Speech to worklife support conference. London Well Being Conference, London.Google Scholar
  40. National Union of Teachers. (2012). Teacher stress: NUT guidance to divisions and associates. Access: https://www.teachers.org.uk/files/TACKLING-STRESS-0713.doc
  41. Nias, J. (1989). Primary teachers talking. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Nias, J. (1996). Thinking about feeling: The emotions in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 293–306.Google Scholar
  43. OECD. (2005a). Education at a glance. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  44. OECD. (2005b). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Patterson, J., & Kelleher, P. (2005). Resilient school leaders: Strategies for turning adversity into achievement. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  46. Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration (BES). Wellington: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  47. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2001). Teacher workload study. London: DfES.Google Scholar
  48. Reivic, K., & Shatte, A. (2002). The resilience factor: 7 keys to finding your inner strength and overcoming life’s hurdles. Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  49. Roosmarijn, M. C., Zwetsloot, G. I. J. M., Bos, E. H., & Wiezer, N. M. (2014). Exploring teacher and school resilience as a new perspective to solve persistent problems in the educational sector. Teachers, Teaching, Theory and Practice, 2015, 622–637.Google Scholar
  50. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. I. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. I. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sachs, J. (2011). Metaphors for continuing teacher professional development: Skilling or emancipating teachers. In N. Mockler & J. Sachs (Eds.), Rethinking educational practice through reflexive inquiry. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  53. Schutz, P. A., & Zembylas, M. (Eds.). (2009). Advances in teacher emotion research: The impact on teachers’ lives (pp. 73–91). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scribner, S. P., Whiteman, R. S., & Crow, G. (2011). Principal professional identity and the cultivation of trust in an urban high school. Paper presented at the UCEA Centre for the Study of Leadership and Ethics 16th Annual Values and Leadership Conference, Victoria, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  55. Seashore-Louis, K. (2007). Trust and improvement in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 8, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Seldon, A. (2009). Trust: How we lost it and how to get it back. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar
  57. Smithers, A., & Robinson, P. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ decisions to leave the profession (Research Report 430). London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  58. Sumsion, J. (2002). Revisiting the challenge of staff recruitment and retention in children’s services. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 27(1), 8–13.Google Scholar
  59. Tait, M. (2008, Fall). Resilience as a contributor to novice teacher success. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35, 51.Google Scholar
  60. Teacher Support Network. (2008). Bullying of teachers a massive and highly damaging problem. Accessed at: http://teachersupport.info/news/announcements/Bullying-of-teachers-a-massiveproblem.php
  61. Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  62. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.Google Scholar
  63. University of Nottingham School of Education. (2010). Centre for Research in Schools and Communities, ESRC seminars [online]. Available at www.nottingham.ac.uk/education/research/crsc/researchprojects/teachersandresilience/index.aspx. Accessed 17 Oct 2012.
  64. Zembylas, M. (2003). Interrogating teacher identity: Emotion, resistance and self-formation. Educational Theory, 53(1), 107–127.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations