On the Preservation of Evolving Digital Content – The Continuum Approach and Relevant Metadata Models

  • Nikolaos Lagos
  • Simon Waddington
  • Jean-Yves Vion-Dury
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 544)

Abstract

We consider the preservation of digital objects in continually evolving ecosystems, for which traditional lifecycle approaches are less appropriate. Motivated by the Records Continuum theory, we define an approach that combines active life with preservation and is non-custodial, which we refer to as the continuum approach. Preserving objects and their associated environment introduces high level of complexity. We therefore describe a model-driven approach, termed the Continuum approach, in which models rather than the digital objects themselves can be analysed. In such setting, the use of appropriate metadata is very important, we therefore outline the PERICLES Linked Resource Model, an upper ontology for modelling digital ecosystems, and compare and contrast it to the Australian Government Recordkeeping Metadata Standard, developed within the record keeping community.

Keywords

Preservation Dependency management Ontology LRM Evolving content Continuum approach 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    CCSDS - Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems: Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS), Recommended Practice, CCSDS 650.0-M-2 (Magenta Book) (2) (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McKemmish, S.: Placing records continuum theory and practice. Archival Science 1(4), 333–359 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Archives of Australia: Australian Government Recordkeeping Metadata Standard Version 2.0 (2008). http://www.naa.gov.au/Images/AGRkMS_tcm16-47131.pdf (accessed on May 28, 2015)
  4. 4.
    Higgins, S.: The DCC Curation Lifecycle Model. International Journal of Digital Curation 3(1), 134–40 (2008). http://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/69 (accessed on May 28, 2015)
  5. 5.
    UK Data Archive. Research Data Lifecycle. http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/create-manage/life-cycle (accessed on May 28, 2015)
  6. 6.
    Ball, A.: Review of Data Management Lifecycle Models (version 1.0). REDm‐MED Project Document redm1rep120110ab10. Bath, UK: University of Bath (2012). http://opus.bath.ac.uk/28587/1/redm1rep120110ab10.pdf (accessed on May 28, 2015)
  7. 7.
    Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Working Group on Information systems and Services (WGISS): Data Life Cycle Models and Concepts CEOS 1.2 (2012). http://ceos.org/document_management/Working_Groups/WGISS/Interest_Groups/Data_Stewardship/White_Papers/WGISS_DSIG_Data-Lifecycle-Models-And-Concepts-v13-1_Apr2012.docx (accessed on May 28, 2015)
  8. 8.
    Sierman, B., Wheatley, P.: PLANETS. D3-4 Report on the Planets Functional Model (2009). http://www.planets-project.eu/docs/reports/Planets_PP7-D3-4_ReportOnThePlanetsFunctionalModel.pdf (accessed on May 28, 2015)
  9. 9.
    Wilson, A.: Significant Properties Report (2007). http://www.significantproperties.org.uk/wp22_significant_properties.pdf (accessed on May 28, 2015)
  10. 10.
    ARMA International: Glossary of Records and Information Management Terms, 4th edn. ARMA International. ISBN: 978-1-933654-15-4Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Upward, F.: Structuring the records continuum (Series of two parts) Part 1: post custodial principles and properties. Archives and Manuscripts 24(2), 268–285 (1996). http://www.infotech.monash.edu.au/research/groups/rcrg/publications/recordscontinuum-fupp1.html (accessed on May 28, 2015)
  12. 12.
    Doerr, M.: The CIDOC CRM, an ontological approach to schema heterogeneity. In: Semantic Interoperability and Integration, vol. 4391 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vion-Dury, J.-Y., Lagos, N., Kontopoulos, E., Riga, M., Mitzias, P., Meditskos, G., Waddington, S., Laurenson, P., Kompatsiaris, Y.: Designing for inconsistency – the dependency-based PERICLES approach. In: Proceedings of SW4CH Workshop in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (to appear, 2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission (2004). http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/ (accessed on May 28, 2015)
  15. 15.
    National Archives of Australia: Australian Government Recordkeeping Metadata Standard Version 2.0 Implementation Guidelines: Exposure Draft (2010). http://www.naa.gov.au/Images/AGRkMS-guidelines_tcm16-47133.pdf (accessed on May 28, 2015)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolaos Lagos
    • 1
  • Simon Waddington
    • 2
  • Jean-Yves Vion-Dury
    • 1
  1. 1.Xerox Research Centre Europe (XRCE)MeylanFrance
  2. 2.Centre for e-Research Department of Digital HumanitiesKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations