PCM 2015: Advances in Multimedia Information Processing -- PCM 2015 pp 506-515 | Cite as
No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on Singular Value Decomposition Without Learning
Abstract
Recently no-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) methods take advantages of machine learning techniques. However, machine learning approaches need a number of human scored images and cause database dependency. In this paper, we propose a simple NR-IQA method that can estimate quality of distorted images without learning, producing comparable performance to learning based approaches. We employ singular value decomposition (SVD) since we have observed that singular values are commonly affected by various distortions. In detail, a decreasing rate of singular values is highly correlated to a degree of distortions regardless of their type. From the observation, our approach utilizes the decreasing rate of singular values to model a simple and reliable NR-IQA method. Experimental results show that the proposed method has reasonably high correlation to human scores. And the proposed method can secure simplicity and database independence.
Keywords
No-reference image quality assessment Singular value decomposition Training-freeReferences
- 1.Moorthy, A.K., Bovik, A.C.: A two-step framework for constructing blind image quality indices. Signal Process. Lett. IEEE 17(5), 513–516 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Moorthy, A.K., Bovik, A.C.: Blind image quality assessment: from natural scene statistics to perceptual quality. Image Process. IEEE Trans. 20(12), 3350–3364 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Saad, M., Bovik, A., Charrier, C.: Blind image quality assessment: a natural scene statistics approach in the DCT domain. Image Process. IEEE Trans. 21(8), 3339–3352 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Mittal, A., Moorthy, A.K., Bovik, A.C.: No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. Image Process. IEEE Trans. 21(12), 4695–4708 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Ye, P., Kumar, J., Kang, L., Doermann, D.: Unsupervised feature learning framework for no-reference image quality assessment. In: 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1098–1105 (2012)Google Scholar
- 6.He, L., Tao, D., Li, X., Gao, X.: Sparse representation for blind image quality assessment. In: 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1146–1153 (2012)Google Scholar
- 7.Kang, L., Ye, P., Li, Y., Doermann, D.: Convolutional neural networks for no-reference image quality assessment. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1733–1740 (2014)Google Scholar
- 8.Mittal, A., Muralidhar, G.S., Ghosh, J., Bovik, A.C.: Blind image quality assessment without human training using latent quality factors. Signal Process. Lett. IEEE 19(2), 75–78 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Sheikh, H.R., Wang, Z., Cormack, L., Bovik, A.C.: LIVE Image Quality Assessment Database Release, vol. 2 (2005)Google Scholar
- 10.Xue, W., Zhang, L., Mou, X.: Learning without human scores for blind image quality assessment. In: 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 995–1002 (2013)Google Scholar
- 11.Kalman, D.: A singularly valuable decomposition: The SVD of a matrix. College Math J. 27, 2–23 (1996). CiteseerMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Narwaria, M., Lin, W.: SVD-based quality metric for image and video using machine learning. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B: Cybern. IEEE Trans. 42(2), 347–364 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Su, B., Lu, S., Tan, C.L.: Blurred image region detection and classification. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 1397–1400. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
- 14.Larson, E.C., Chandler, D.M.: Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy. J. Electron. Imaging 19(1), 011006–011006 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Ponomarenko, N., Lukin, V., Zelensky, A., Egiazarian, K., Carli, M., Battisti, F.: TID2008-a database for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics. Adv. Mod. Radioelectron. 10(4), 30–45 (2009)Google Scholar