An Efficient Partition Scheme for Depth-Based Block Partitioning in 3D-HEVC

  • Yuhua Zhang
  • Ce Zhu
  • Yongbing Lin
  • Jianhua Zheng
  • Yong Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9315)

Abstract

In the development of a 3D video extension of High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standard, namely 3D-HEVC, Depth-based Block Partitioning (DBBP) is employed to code texture videos in dependent views by utilizing coded depth information of an independent view. With the DBBP, a proper partition mode is determined with the coded depth information, which divides the current texture block into two regions and thereafter allows for fine-grained motion compensation of foreground and background separately. In the DBBP, the original partition method consists of two steps specifically, i.e. threshold calculation and matched filtering based on down-sampling, which is relatively high complex and redundant with a segment mask generation process. Accordingly, a simple yet more effective partition scheme for the DBBP coding is proposed in this paper, based on the available binary segment mask. While reducing computational complexity significantly, the proposed method also demonstrates bitrate saving for all the dependent texture views and synthesized views under common test conditions (CTC) configuration specified in the 3D-HEVC.

Keywords

3D-HEVC Depth-based block partitioning Partition mode Binary segment mask Simple yet more effective 

References

  1. 1.
    Müller, K., Schwarz, H., Marpe, D., Bartnik, C., et al.: 3D high-efficiency video coding for multi-view video and depth data. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(9), 3366–3378 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhu, C., Zhao, Y., Yu, L., Tanimoto, M.: 3D-TV system with depth-image-based rendering: architectures, techniques and challenges. Springer, Berlin (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fehn, C.: Depth-image-based rendering (DIBR), compression and transmission for a new approach on 3D-TV. In: Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XI, CA, U.S.A., Vol. 5291, pp. 93–104, January 2004Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11. Applications and Requirements on 3D Video Coding, Doc. N12035, Geneva, Switzerland, March 2011Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11. Call for Proposals on 3D Video Coding Technology, Doc. N12036, Geneva, CH, March 2011Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lei, J., Li, S., Zhu, C., Sun, M.-T., Hou, C.: Depth coding based on depth-texture motion and structure similarities. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 25(2), 275–286 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, S., Lei, J., Zhu, C., Yu, L., Hou, C.: Pixel-based inter prediction in coded texture assisted depth coding. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 21(1), 74–78 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, S., Zhu, C., Lei, J.: Depth-texture cooperative clustering and alignment for high efficiency depth intra coding. In: IEEE China Summit & International Conference on Signal and Information Processing (ChinaSIP), Beijing, China, July 2013 (Invited Paper)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jager, F.: Depth-based block partitioning for 3D video coding. In: Picture Coding Symposium (PCS), San Jose, CA (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park, M., Lee, J., Cho, Y., Kim, C.: Partition derivation for DBBP. ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, JCT3 V-I0077, 9th Meeting: Sapporo, JP, 3–9 July 2014Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mueller, K., Vetro, A.: Common test conditions of 3DV core experiments. ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, JCT3 V-G1100, 7th Meeting: San José, US, 11–17 January 2014Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, Y., Tech, G., Wegner, K., et al.: Test model 8 of 3D-HEVC and MV-HEVC. ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, JCT3 V-H1003, 8th Meeting: Valencia, ES (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    HEVC 3D extension software repository (at HHI). https://hevc.hhi.fraunhofer.de/svn/svn_3DVCSoftware/tags/HTM-11.0
  14. 14.
    Bjontegaard, G.: Calculation of Average PSNR Differences between RD-curves. ITU-T Q.6/SG16 VCEG, VCEG-M33, April 2001Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuhua Zhang
    • 1
  • Ce Zhu
    • 1
  • Yongbing Lin
    • 2
  • Jianhua Zheng
    • 2
  • Yong Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina
  2. 2.HiSilicon Technologies Co. LtdBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations