Advertisement

Unfair Means: Use Cases Beyond Plagiarism

  • Paul Clough
  • Peter Willett
  • Jessie Lim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9283)

Abstract

The study of plagiarism and its detection is a highly popular field of research that has witnessed increased attention over recent years. In this paper we describe the range of problems that exist within academe in the area of ‘unfair means’, which encompasses a wider range of issues of attribution, ownership and originality. Unfair means offers a variety of problems that may benefit from the development of computational methods, thereby requiring appropriate evaluation resources. This may provide further areas of focus for large-scale evaluation activities, such as PAN, and researchers in the field more generally.

Keywords

Engineer Ethic Academic Misconduct Plagiarism Detection Author Identification Unfair Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alzahrani, S., et al.: Using structural information and citation evidence to detect significant plagiarism cases in scientific publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 63(2), 286–312 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bretag, T., Mahmud, S.: A Model for Determining student plagiarism: electronic detection and academic judgement. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 6(1) (2009). http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol6/iss1/6
  3. 3.
    Citron, D.T., Ginsparg, P.: Patterns of text reuse in a scientific corpus. PNAS 112(1), 25–30 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Culwin, F., Lancaster, T.: Plagiarism issues for higher education. Vine 31(2), 36–41 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Errami, M., et al.: Déjà vu: A study of duplicate citations in Medline. Bioinformatics 24(2), 243–249 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gollub, T., Potthast, M., Beyer, A., Busse, M., Rangel, F., Rosso, P., Stamatatos, E., Stein, B.: Recent trends in digital text forensics and its evaluation - Plagiarism detection, author identification, and author profiling. In: Forner, P., Müller, H., Paredes, R., Rosso, P., Stein, B. (eds.) CLEF 2013. LNCS, vol. 8138, pp. 282–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harris, R.A.: The Plagiarism Handbook: Strategies For Preventing, Detecting, And Dealing With Plagiarism. Eyrczak Publishing, California (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joy, M., Luck, M.: Plagiarism in programming assignments. IEEE Transactions on Education 42(1), 129–133 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lesk, M.: How many scientific papers are not original? PNAS 112(1), 6–7 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin, B.: Plagiarism: a misplaced emphasis. Journal of Information Ethics 3(2), 36–47 (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Potthast, M., et al.: Cross-language plagiarism detection. Language Resources and Evaluation 45(1), 45–62 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pupovac, V., Fanelli, D.: Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys. Journal of Science and Engineering Ethics 1–22 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilks, Y.: On the Ownership of Text. Computers and the Humanities 38(2), 115–127 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wood, G., Warnken, P.: Academic original sin: plagiarism, the Internet and librarians. Journal of Academic Librarianship 30(3), 237–242 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information SchoolUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations