Requirements and Open Issues for ISs Supporting Dynamic Community Bonding in Emergency Situations

  • Tania Di Mascio
  • Federico Gobbo
  • Laura Tarantino
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 11)

Abstract

Studies show that in emergency situations, like in the aftermath of natural disasters, people tend to self-organize into so-called ephemeral organizations and transitional communities based on common problems, common places, etc. Strict interactions among victims, fundamental to strengthen such small communities, may be efficiently supported by a new generation of mobile-empowered disaster management systems based on the social networking approach, with crowd-generated and geo-referenced data. In this paper we discuss how a shift of perspective in the interaction, conceptual, logical and physical models adopted for the social network can efficiently support the dynamic bonding/de-bonding/re-bonding of communities that emerge based on alliances around shared problems and/or objectives.

Keywords

Social network Interaction Emergency management 

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander, D.: Principles of Emergency Planning and Management. Oxford University Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angles, R., Gutierrez, C.: Survey of graph database models. J. ACM Comput. Surv. 40, 1–39 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barbini, F.M.: Organization in disaster: The failure of disaster-recovery plans in the aftermath of the AZF explosion. In: 24th EGOS Colloquium. Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barbini, F.M.: Organization in disaster: International cooperation and relief activities coordination during the indian ocean tsunami emergency. In: 25th EGOS Colloquium. Barcelona (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barbini, F.M., D’Atri, A., Tarantino, L., Za, S.: A new generation DMS for supporting social sensemaking. In: De Marco, M., Te-eni, D., Albano, V., Za, S. (eds) Information Systems: Crossroads for Organization, Management, Accounting and Engineering, pp. 105–11. Springer, Heiderlberg (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barbini, F.M., D’Atri, A., Tarantino, L., Za, S.: EagleVox: An innovative information systems to support social sensemaking in the aftermnath of large scale disaster. In: 27th EGOS Colloquium. Reassembling Organizations, Gothernburg (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benini, M., Gobbo, F.: Virtual communities as narrative processes. In: Maggiorini, D., Provetti, A., Ripamonti, L. (eds.) BOF’07—Between Ontologies and Folksonomies: Tools and Architectures for Managing and Retrieving Emerging Knowledge in Communities, CEUR-WS, vol. 312. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-312/ (2007)
  8. 8.
    Careem, M.: Sahana: Overview of a disaster management system. In: International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA), pp. 361–366. Colombo (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caianiello, P., Costantini, F., Gobbo, F., Leombruni, D., Tarantino, L.: The adoption of urban public space as a driving force for third places in the remediation of democracy. In: Proceedings of CHI’13 HCI3P workshop (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang, F., Dean, J., Ghemawat, S., Hsieh, W.C., Wallach, D.A., Burrows, M., Chandra, T., Fikes, A., Gruber, R.E.: Bigtable: A distributed storage system for structured data. J. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 26, 1–26 (2008)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Comfort, L.K.: Self-organization in complex systems. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 4, 393–410 (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dorogovtsev, S.N., Mendes, J.F.F.: Evolution of Networks From Biological Nets to the Internet and www. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    European Environment Agency: Mapping the impacts of natural hazards and technological accidents in Europe—an overview of the last decade. EEA Technical report n. 13/2010, ISSN 1725-2237 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fenoglio, M.T.: La Comunità nei Disastri: una Prospettiva Psicosociale. Rivista di Psicologia dell’Emergenza e dell’Assistenza Umanitaria 1, 6–23 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gobbo, F.: Improving flickr discovery through wikipedias. In: Maggiorini, D., Provetti, A., Ripamonti, L. (eds.) BOF’07—Between Ontologies and Folksonomies: Tools and Architectures for Managing and Retrieving Emerging Knowledge in Communities, CEUR-WS, vol. 312. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-312/ (2007)
  16. 16.
    Gordon, R.: Engineering Aspects of Disaster Recovery. Local Government Guide to Disaster Management. State Government Printing Office, Melbourne (1991)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lanzara, G.F.: Ephemeral organizations in extreme environments: Emergency, strategy, Extinction. J. Manage. Stud. 20, 71–95 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Masedu, F., Mazza, M., Di Giovanni, C., Calvarese, A., Tiberti, S., Sconci, V., Valenti, M.: Facebook, Quality of Life, and Mental Health Outcomes in Post-Disaster Urban Environments: The L’Aquila Earthquake Experience. Frontiers in Publich Health, 2, art. 286 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Newman, M.E.J.: The structure and function of complex networks. J. SIAM Rev. 45, 167–256 (2003)MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Okolloh, O.: Ushahidi, or testimony: Web 2.0 tools for crowdsourcing crisis information. Participatory Learn. Action Workshop 59, 65–70 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    SED Spa per SGE/STM Abruzzo. www.6aprile.it
  23. 23.
    Sellnow, T.L., Seeger, M.W., Ulmer, R.R.: Chaos theory, informational needs, and natural disasters. J. Appl. Commun. Res. 30, 269–292 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Solé, A.: Createurs de Mondes. Nos Impossibles. Editions du Rocher, Monaco, Nos Possibles (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Turoff, M.: The design of emergency response management information systems. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. 5, 1–35 (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Van deWalle, B., Turoff, M., Hiltz, S.R. (eds.): Information Systems for Emergency Management. Advances in Management Information Systems, vol. 16. M.E Sharpe, Armonk (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wallance, A., De Balogh, F.: Decision support systems for disaster management. Public Adm. Rev. 45, 134–146 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weick, K.E.: The collapse of sensemaking in organizations. Tha Mann Gulch Disaster. Adm. Sci. Q. 38, 628–652 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    White, C.: A real time online delphi decision system, V 2.0: Crisis management support during extreme events. In: International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management. Lisbon, Portugal (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tania Di Mascio
    • 1
  • Federico Gobbo
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Laura Tarantino
    • 1
  1. 1.Università Degli Studi Dell’AquilaL’AquilaItaly
  2. 2.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
  3. 3.University of Milano BicoccaMilanItaly
  4. 4.University of TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations