Sustainability as a Catalyst for Change in Universities: New Roles to Meet New Challenges

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Management and Industrial Engineering book series (MINEN)

Abstract

Universities are generally structured and staffed to meet the two traditional functions of research and teaching, which are supported by the university’s operational staff. In many universities this is expressed through two categories of staff—academic staff and professional staff (sometimes referred to as ‘general staff’). It is proposed that the complexities of responding to contemporary sustainability issues means that within universities these traditional staffing categories are becoming increasingly blurred, which is challenging traditional management models of universities, and a new category of staff is emerging. Staff need to cross, and sometimes to straddle, the traditional boundary between academic and nonacademic roles to address the complex inter- and multidisciplinary challenges of almost every sustainability issue that a university responds to. This chapter presents case studies where this new territory, termed the ‘third space’ by Whitchurch (High Educ Q 62:377–396, 2008), has emerged in the context of sustainability. It is proposed that sustainability is a catalyst for this change of roles for many university staff who are involved with sustainability and that this challenges university management to not only acknowledge this shift, but also to determine the best path forward to support their staff in succeeding in meeting the sustainability challenges ahead.

Keywords

Fair Trade Academic Staff Green Roof Organizational Boundary Professional Staff 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Brundtland, G. (1987) Our common future: Report of the 1987 world commission on environment and development. United Nations.Google Scholar
  2. Chambers, D. (2015) Maximising sustainability outcomes by amalgamating dimensions of sustainability. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Transformative approaches to sustainable development at universities (pp. 195–206). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Conway, M. (1998). Academics and administrators: Competitive collaborators? Journal of Institutional Research in Australasia, 7(2), 26–35.Google Scholar
  4. Dobson, I. R. (2000). ‘Them and Us’—General and non-general staff in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(2), 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dobson, I. R., & Conway, M. (2003). Fear and loathing in university staffing: The case of Australian academic and general staff. Higher Education Management & Policy, 15(3), 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Gornall, L. (1999). ‘New professionals’: Change and occupational roles in higher education. Perspectives: Policy & Practice in Higher Education, 3(2), 44–49.Google Scholar
  8. McInnis, C. (1998). Academics and professional administrators in Australian universities: Dissolving boundaries and new tensions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 20(2), 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Szekeres, J. (2004). The invisible workers. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(1), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Whitchurch, C. (2008). Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: The emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne Graduate School of EducationThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.The ChancelleryThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations