Residual Signal Techniques Used for Gear Fault Detection

  • Omar D. MohammedEmail author
  • Matti Rantatalo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


The role of vibration monitoring is to detect any impact on the vibration signal due to gear degradation and to give an early warning. Early detection allows a proper scheduled shutdown to prevent failure. Residual signal method can be applied to improve the extraction of the hidden fault impact. The current paper presents a comparative study of three different residual techniques. The paper concludes with a brief discussion on the used methods.


Gear fault detection Gear dynamics Residual signal method 


  1. 1.
    Stewart RM (1977) Some useful data analysis techniques for gearbox diagnostics. In: Proceedings of meeting on application of time series analysis. ISVR, Southampton, UK, pp 18.1–18.19Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang W, Wong AK (2002) Autoregressive model-based gear fault diagnosis. J Vib Acoust 124:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu S (2007) Gearbox dynamic simulation and estimation of fault growth. MSc thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu S, Zuo M, Parey A (2008) Simulation of spur gear dynamics and estimation of fault growth. J Sound Vib 317(3–5):608–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mohammed OD, Rantatalo M, Aidanpaa J, Kumar U (2013) Vibration signal analysis for gear fault diagnosis with various crack progression scenarios. Mech Syst Signal Process 41:176–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahgoun H, Bekka RE, Felkaoui A (2012) Gearbox fault diagnosis using ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and residual signal. Tribol Int 13(1):33–44Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen Z, Shao Y (2011) Dynamic simulation of spur gear with tooth root crack propagating along tooth width and crack depth. Eng Fail Anal 18(8):2149–2164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chaari F, Fakhfakh T, Haddar M (2009) Analytical modelling of spur gear tooth crack and influence on gearmesh stiffness. Eur J Mech A Solids 28(3):461–468CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    He S, Cho S, Singh R (2008) Prediction of dynamic friction forces in spur gears using alternate sliding friction formulations. J Sound Vib 309(3–5):843–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    He S, Gunda R, Singh R (2007) Effect of sliding friction on the dynamics of spur gear pair with realistic time-varying stiffness. J Sound Vib 301(3–5):927–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Isermann R, Balle P (1997) Trends in the application of model-based fault detection and diagnosis of technical processes. Control Eng Pract 5:709–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Isermann R (2005) Model-based fault-detection and diagnosis—status and applications. Annu Rev Control 29:71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jardine AKS, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20:1483–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Operation and Maintenance EngineeringLulea University of TechnologyLuleåSweden

Personalised recommendations