East European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems

ADBIS 2015: New Trends in Databases and Information Systems pp 488-497 | Cite as

A Novel Vision for Navigation and Enrichment in Cultural Heritage Collections

  • Joffrey Decourselle
  • Audun Vennesland
  • Trond Aalberg
  • Fabien Duchateau
  • Nicolas Lumineau
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 539)

Abstract

In the cultural heritage domain, there is a huge interest in utilizing semantic web technology and build services enabling users to query, explore and access the vast body of cultural heritage information that has been created over decades by memory institutions. For successful conversion of existing data into semantic web data, however, there is often a need to enhance and enrich the legacy data to validate and align it with other resources and reveal its full potential. In this visionary paper, we describe a framework for semantic enrichment that relies on the creation of thematic knowledge bases, i.e., about a given topic. These knowledge bases aggregate information by exploiting structured resources (e.g., Linked Open Data cloud) and by extracting new relationships from streams (e.g., Twitter) and textual documents (e.g., web pages). Our focused application in this paper is how this approach can be utilized when transforming library records into semantic web data based on the FRBR model in the process that commonly is called FRBRization.

Keywords

Cultural heritage Data integration Semantic web Linked open data Entity linking Ontology and entity matching 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bellahsene, Z., Bonifati, A., Rahm, E. (eds.): Schema Matching and Mapping. Data-Centric Systems and Applications. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berardi, G., Esuli, A., Gordea, S., Marcheggiani, D., Sebastiani, F.: Metadata Enrichment Services for the Europeana Digital Library. In: Zaphiris, P., Buchanan, G., Rasmussen, E., Loizides, F. (eds.) TPDL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7489, pp. 508–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data - The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5(3), 1–22 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Böhm, C., de Melo, G., Naumann, F., Weikum, G.: Linda: Distributed web-of-data-scale entity matching. In: International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2012, pp. 2104–2108. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buchanan, G.: FRBR: Enriching and integrating digital libraries. In: JCDL (June 2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carlson, A., Betteridge, J., Kisiel, B., Settles, B., Hruschka Jr., E.R.H., Mitchell, T.M.: Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning. In: Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2010) (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dai, H.J., Wu, C.Y., Tsai, R., Hsu, W.L.: From entity recognition to entity linking: a survey of advanced entity linking techniques. In: The 26th Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1–10 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dickey, T.J.: FRBRization of a Library Catalog: Better Collocation of Records, Leading to Enhanced Search, Retrieval, and Display. Information Technology & Libraries 27, 23–32 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Etzioni, O., Banko, M., Soderland, S., Weld, D.S.: Open information extraction from the web. Communication of ACM 51, 68–74 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching, 2nd edn. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hachey, B., Radford, W., Nothman, J., Honnibal, M., Curran, J.R.: Evaluating entity linking with wikipedia. Artificial Intelligence 194, 130–150 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Halpin, H., Hayes, P.J., McCusker, J.P., McGuinness, D.L., Thompson, H.S.: When owl:sameAs Isn’t the Same: An Analysis of Identity in Linked Data. In: Patel-Schneider, P.F., Pan, Y., Hitzler, P., Mika, P., Zhang, L., Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I., Glimm, B. (eds.) ISWC 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6496, pp. 305–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haslhofer, B., Momeni, E., Gay, M., Simon, R.: Augmenting europeana content with linked data resources. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Semantic Systems, I-SEMANTICS 2010, pp. 40:1–40:3. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    IFLA: Functional requirements for bibliographic records: final report. Tech. rep., IFLA (February 2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ioannou, E., Rassadko, N., Velegrakis, Y.: On Generating Benchmark Data for Entity Matching. Journal on Data Semantics 2(1), 37–56 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Isaac, A., van der Meij, L., Schlobach, S., Wang, S.: An Empirical Study of Instance-Based Ontology Matching. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 253–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Köpcke, H., Thor, A., Rahm, E.: Evaluation of entity resolution approaches on real-world match problems. PVLDB 3(1), 484–493 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lacoste-Julien, S., Palla, K., Davies, A., Kasneci, G., Graepel, T., Ghahramani, Z.: Sigma: Simple greedy matching for aligning large knowledge bases. In: International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2013, pp. 572–580. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lalmas, M.: Aggregated search. In: Melucci, M., Baeza-Yates, R. (eds.) Advanced Topics in Information Retrieval, The Information Retrieval Series, vol. 33, pp. 109–123. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Le Bœuf, P.: FRBR: Hype or cure-all? Introduction. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 39(3-), 1–13 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Merčun, T., Žumer, M., Aalberg, T.: Presenting and Exploring the Complexity of Bibliographic Relationships. In: Chen, H.-H., Chowdhury, G. (eds.) ICADL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7634, pp. 63–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakashole, N., Weikum, G., Suchanek, F.M.: Discovering and exploring relations on the web. PVLDB 5(12), 1982–1985 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parameswaran, A., Garcia-Molina, H., Rajaraman, A.: Towards the web of concepts: extracting concepts from large datasets. Proceedings of VLDB Endowment 3, 566–577 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stiller, J., Petras, V., Gäde, M., Isaac, A.: Automatic Enrichments with Controlled Vocabularies in Europeana: Challenges and Consequences. In: Ioannides, M., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Fink, E., Žarnić, R., Yen, A.-Y., Quak, E. (eds.) EuroMed 2014. LNCS, vol. 8740, pp. 238–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Suchanek, F.M., Abiteboul, S., Senellart, P.: Paris: Probabilistic alignment of relations, instances, and schema. Proc. VLDB Endow. 5(3), 157–168 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Suchanek, F.M., Sozio, M., Weikum, G.: SOFIE: A Self-Organizing Framework for Information Extraction. In: International World Wide Web conference (WWW 2009). ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Takhirov, N., Duchateau, F., Aalberg, T.: Linking FRBR Entities to LOD through Semantic Matching. In: Gradmann, S., Borri, F., Meghini, C., Schuldt, H. (eds.) TPDL 2011. LNCS, vol. 6966, pp. 284–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Takhirov, N., Duchateau, F., Aalberg, T.: An Evidence-Based Verification Approach to Extract Entities and Relations for Knowledge Base Population. In: Cudré-Mauroux, P., Heflin, J., Sirin, E., Tudorache, T., Euzenat, J., Hauswirth, M., Parreira, J.X., Hendler, J., Schreiber, G., Bernstein, A., Blomqvist, E. (eds.) ISWC 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7649, pp. 575–590. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joffrey Decourselle
    • 1
  • Audun Vennesland
    • 2
  • Trond Aalberg
    • 2
  • Fabien Duchateau
    • 1
  • Nicolas Lumineau
    • 1
  1. 1.LIRIS, UMR5205Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1LyonFrance
  2. 2.Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations