Advertisement

East European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems

ADBIS 2015: New Trends in Databases and Information Systems pp 427-437 | Cite as

Knowledge Representation in EPNet

  • Alessandro MoscaEmail author
  • José Remesal
  • Martin Rezk
  • Guillem Rull
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 539)

Abstract

Semantic technologies are rapidly changing the historical research. This paper focuses on the knowledge representation and data modelling initiative that has characterised the first year of the EPNet project in the context of the historical research. The so-called EPNet CRM and Ontology are introduced here, and put in connection with existing modelling standards. The formal specification of the domain expert knowledge is the preliminary step toward the design of an innovative ‘Virtual Research Environment’ for scholars of the Roman Empire. Potential and actual benefits coming from the knowledge representation initiative are also discussed, with the main aim of encouraging experts in the humanities in embracing an innovative paradigm whose proved efficacy can positively affect their current research practices.

References

  1. 1.
    Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S.: Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies. Chapman & Hall/CRC (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shadbolt, N., Berners-Lee, T., Hall, W.: The semantic web revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(3), 96–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Domingue, J., Fensel, D., Hendler, J.: Handbook of semantic web technologies. Handbook of Semantic Web Technologies, vol. 1–2. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raghavan, P.: It’s time to scale the science in the social sciences. Big Data & Society (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schreiber, G., Amin, A.K., van Assem, M., de Boer, V., Hardman, L., Hildebrand, M., Hollink, L., Huang, Z., van Kersen, J., de Niet, M., Omelayenko, B., van Ossenbruggen, J., Siebes, R., Taekema, J., Wielemaker, J., Wielinga, B.J.: Multimedian e-culture demonstrator. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 951–958. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meroo-Peuela, A., Ashkpour, A., van Erp, M., Mandemakers, K., Breure, L., Scharnhorst, A., Schlobach, S., van Harmelen, F.: Semantic technologies for historical research: A survey. Semantic Web Journal 588–1795 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rodríguez-Muro, M., Kontchakov, R., Zakharyaschev, M.: Ontology-based data access: Ontop of databases. In: Alani, H., Kagal, L., Fokoue, A., Groth, P., Biemann, C., Parreira, J.X., Aroyo, L., Noy, N., Welty, C., Janowicz, K. (eds.) ISWC 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8218, pp. 558–573. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rodriguez-Muro, M., Rezk, M.: Efficient SPARQL-to-SQL with R2RML mappings. Journal of Web Semantics (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., Porter, B.: Handbook of Knowledge Representation. Elsevier Science, San Diego (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garnsey, P., Whittaker, C.: Trade and famine in classical antiquity. Supplementary volume - Cambridge Philological Society. Cambr. University Press (1983)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cascio, E., Rathbone, D.: Production and Public Powers in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge Philological Society (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Halpin, T., Morgan, T.: Information modeling and relational databases. MK (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franconi, E., Mosca, A., Solomakhin, D.: ORM2: formalisation and encoding in OWL2. In: Herrero, P., Panetto, H., Meersman, R., Dillon, T. (eds.) OTM-WS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7567, pp. 368–378. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guldi, J., Armitage, D.: The History Manifesto. Cambridge University Press (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bishop, B., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanoff, D., Peikov, I., Tashev, Z., Velkov, R.: OWLIM: A family of scalable semantic repositories. Semantic Web 2(1), 33–42 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Civili, C., Console, M., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Lepore, L., Mancini, R., Poggi, A., Rosati, R., Ruzzi, M., Santarelli, V., Savo, D.F.: MASTRO STUDIO: managing ontology-based data access applications. PVLDB 6(12), 1314–1317 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mosca, A., Remesal, J., Rezk, M., Rull, G.: A ‘Historical Case’ of ontology-based data access. In: Digital Heritage 2015 (2015, to appear)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Mosca
    • 1
    Email author
  • José Remesal
    • 2
  • Martin Rezk
    • 3
  • Guillem Rull
    • 2
  1. 1.SIRIS LabResearch Division of SIRIS AcademicBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.CEIPACUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.KRDB Research CentreFree University of Bozen-BolzanoBolzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations