East European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems

ADBIS 2015: New Trends in Databases and Information Systems pp 382-391 | Cite as

Ontology Based Linkage Between Enterprise Architecture, Processes, and Time

  • Marite Kirikova
  • Ludmila Penicina
  • Andrejs Gaidukovs
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 539)

Abstract

In an highly dynamic social and business environment time becomes one of the most treasured recourses of companies and individuals. However, there are no many research works devoted to explicit analysis of time issues. Therefore, despite of a large number of enterprise and business process representation and analysis tools, it is still impossible to address time to full extent in systems modeling and analysis. This paper proposes linkage between enterprise architecture, process, and time models to promote development of methods for managing time issues in systems development, maintenance and change management. The linkage roots in Bunge’s systems ontology and concerns time ontology edited by Hobbs and Pan.

Keywords

Upper ontology Enterprise architecture Business process Time ontology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gaidukovs, A., Kirikova, M.: The time dimension in information logistics. In: Proceedings of ILOG@ BIR., pp. 35–43. CEUR Press (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hobbs, J.R., Pan, F.: Time Ontology in OWL: W3C Working Draft (2006). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/
  3. 3.
    Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. Inf. Syst. J. 3, 217–237 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Vol. 4: Ontology II: A World of Systems (1979)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knowledge Craver: Guidelines for Using the W3C Time Ontology (2014). http://knowledgecraver.blogspot.com/2014/07/guidelines-for-using-w3c-time-ontology.html
  6. 6.
    Trudel, A.: The Temporal Perspective: Expressing Temporal Constraints and Dependencies in Process Models, pp. 1–14 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    TOGAF® Version 9.1 (2011). http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/
  8. 8.
    Zachman International® - The Official Home of The Zachman FrameworkTM (2014). http://www.zachman.com/
  9. 9.
    DODAF - DOD Architecture Framework Version 2.02 - DOD Deputy Chief Information Officer (2012). http://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/DODAF
  10. 10.
    Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA), The White House (2013). https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/e-GOV/FEA
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Betke, H., Kittel, K., Sackmann, S.: Modeling controls for compliance - an analysis of business process modeling languages. In: 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, pp. 866–871. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Santos Jr., P.S., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G.: An ontology-based semantic foundation for ARIS EPCs. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 124–130. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Watahiki, K., Ishikawa, F., Hiraishi, K.: Formal verification of business processes with temporal and resource constraints. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 1173–1180. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheikhrouhou, S., Kallel, S., Guermouche, N., Jmaiel, M.: Toward a time-centric modeling of business processes in BPMN 2.0. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services, pp. 154–163. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stiehl, V.: Process-Driven Applications with BPMN. Springer (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gagne, D., Trudel, A.: Time-BPMN. In: 2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, pp. 361–367. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huai, W., Liu, X., Sun, H.: Towards trustworthy composite service through business process model verification. In: 7th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing and 7th International Conference on Autonomic & Trusted Computing, pp. 422–427. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Makni, M., Tata, S., Yeddes, M., Ben Hadj-Alouane, N.: Satisfaction and coherence of deadline constraints in inter-organizational workflows. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T.S., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6426, pp. 523–539. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kallel, S., Charfi, A., Dinkelaker, T., Mezini, M., Jmaiel, M.: Specifying and monitoring temporal properties in web services compositions. In: Seventh IEEE European Conference on Web Services. pp. 148–157. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guermouche, N., Zilio, S.D.: Towards timed requirement verification for service choreographies. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, pp. 117–126. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peņicina, L., Kirikova, M.: Towards controlling lawful states and events in business process models. In: IEEE 16th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI 2014), pp. 15–23. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosemann, M., Vessey, I., Weber, R., Wyssusek, B.: On the Applicability of the Bunge – Wand – Weber Ontology to Enterprise Systems Requirements (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marite Kirikova
    • 1
  • Ludmila Penicina
    • 1
  • Andrejs Gaidukovs
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Applied Computer SystemsRiga Technical UniversityRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations