Conference on Smart Spaces

ruSMART 2015: Internet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation Networks and Systems pp 68-79 | Cite as

Multi-level Robots Self-organization in Smart Space: Approach and Case Study

  • Alexander Smirnov
  • Alexey Kashevnik
  • Sergey Mikhailov
  • Mikhail Mironov
  • Olesya Baraniuc
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9247)

Abstract

This paper presents an approach and case study for multi-level robots self-organization in smart space. The presented approach benefits from integration of such technologies as multi-level self-organization and knowledge fusion. A Smart-M3 information sharing platform is used for creating smart spaces with ontology-driven information sharing based on Semantic Web. To provide semantic interoperability, the RDF ontologies for the robots participating in the scenario, have been built and ontology matching technique is used. The scenario implementation is based on Lego® Mindstorms EV3 set for robot construction, which at the moment is one of the most popular sets for education.

Keywords

Robots Self-organization Smart space 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cook, D.J., Das, S.K.: How smart are our environments? an updated look at the state of the art. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 3(2), 53–73 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balandin, S., Waris, H.: Key properties in the development of smart spaces. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5615, pp. 3–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Serugendo, G., Gleizes, M., Karageorgos, A.: Self-Organisation and Emergence in MAS: An Overview. Informatica 30, 45–54 (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baca, J., Pagala, P., Rossi, C., Ferre, M.: Modular robot systems towards the execution of cooperative tasks in large facilities. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 66, 159–174 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rodić, A., Jovanović, M., Stevanović, I., Karan, B., Potkonjak, V.: Building Technology Platform Aimed to Develop Service Robot with Embedded Personality and Enhanced Communication with Social Environment, Digital Communications and Networks (2015). doi:10.1016/j.dcan.2015.03.002
  6. 6.
    Honkola, J., Laine, H., Brown, R., Tyrkko, O.: Smart-M3 information sharing platform. In: Proc. ISCC 2010, pp. 1041–1046. IEEE Comp. Soc., June 2010Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., Masinter, L.: RFC 3986 – Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax. URL: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986
  8. 8.
    Resource Description Framework (RDF). W3C standard, Web: http://www.w3.org/RDF/
  9. 9.
    Smirnov, A., Kashevnik, A., Teslya, N., Mikhailov, S., Shabaev, A.: Smart-M3-based robots self-organization in pick-and-place system. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the Open Innovations Association FRUCT, Yaroslavl, Russia, pp. 210–215, April 20–24, 2015Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hofkirchner, W.: Emergence and the Logic of Explanation, An Argument for the Unity of Science. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Mathematics, Computing and Management in Engineering Series 91, 23–30 (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fuchs, C.: Globalization and Self-Organization in the Knowledge-Based Society. TripleC 1(2), 105–169 (2003). (http://triplec.uti.at)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ambient Networks Phase 2, Integrated Design for Context, Network and Policy Management, Deliverable D10.-D1 (2006). http://www.ambient-networks.org/Files/deliverables/D10-D.1_PU.pdf
  13. 13.
    Telenor R&D, Report, Project No TFPFAN, Program Peer-to-peer computing (2003). http://www.telenor.com/rd/pub/rep03/R_17_2003.pdf
  14. 14.
    De Mola, F., Quitadamo, R.: Towards an agent model for future autonomic communications. In: Proceedings of the 7th WOA 2006 Workshop From Objects to Agents, Catania, Italy, September 26–27, 2006. http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-204/P07.pdf
  15. 15.
    Jantsch, E.: Design for Evolution. George Braziller, New York (1975)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smirnov, A., Kashevnik, A., Shilov, N., Balandin, S., Oliver, I., Boldyrev, S.: On-the-fly ontology matching in smart spaces: a multi-model approach. In: Balandin, S., Dunaytsev, R., Koucheryavy, Y. (eds.) ruSMART 2010. LNCS, vol. 6294, pp. 72–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Balandin, S., Boldyrev, S., Oliver, I.J., Turenko, T., Smirnov, A.V., Shilov, N.G., Kashevnik, A.M.: Method and apparatus for ontology matching. US 2012/0078595 A1 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Smirnov
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alexey Kashevnik
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sergey Mikhailov
    • 2
  • Mikhail Mironov
    • 2
  • Olesya Baraniuc
    • 2
  1. 1.SPIIRASSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.ITMO UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations