Advertisement

A Conceptual Model Towards the Scaffolding of Learning Experience

  • Sylvester Arnab
  • Pablo Moreno Ger
  • Theodore Lim
  • Petros Lameras
  • Maurice Hendrix
  • Kristian Kiili
  • Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge
  • Manuel Ninaus
  • Sara de Freitas
  • Alessandro Mazzetti
  • Anders Dahlbom
  • Cristiana Degano
  • Ioana Stanescu
  • Maria Riveiro
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9221)

Abstract

The challenge of delivering personalized learning experiences is amplified by the size of classrooms and of online learning communities. In turn, serious games are increasingly recognized for their potential to improve education, but a typical requirement from instructors is to gain insight into how the students are playing. When we bring games into the rapidly growing online learning communities, the challenges multiply and hinder the potential effectiveness of serious games. There is a need to deliver a comprehensive, flexible and intelligent learning framework that facilitates better understanding of learners’ knowledge, effective assessment of their progress and continuous evaluation and optimization of the environments in which they learn. This paper aims to explore the potential in the use of games and learning analytics towards scaffolding and supporting teaching and learning experience. The conceptual model discussed aims to highlight key considerations that may advance the current state of learning analytics, adaptive learning and serious games, by leveraging serious games as an ideal medium for gathering data and performing adaptations. This opportunity has the potential to affect the design and deployment of education and training in the future.

Keywords

Game Play Learning Content Learn Management System Intelligent Tutor System Virtual Learning Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been co-funded by the EU under the FP7, in the Games and Learning Alliance (GALA) Network of Excellence, Grant Agreement nr. 258169, and the SCAFFOLD consortium.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Silva, E.: Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappan 90(9), 630–634 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ananiadou, K., Claro, M.: 21st Century Skills and Competencies for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries (2009). http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/21st-century-skills-and-competences-for-new-millennium-learners-in-oecd-countries_218525261154. Accessed 16 March 2013
  4. 4.
    Salpeter, J.: 21st Century Skills: Will our students be prepared? (2008). http://dca1to1.pbworks.com/f/21st+Century+-+will+our+students+be+prepared.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2013
  5. 5.
    Dede, C.: Comparing frameworks for 21st Century Skills (2009). http://dca1to1.pbworks.com/f/21st+Century+-+will+our+students+be+prepared.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2013
  6. 6.
    Eurydice Report. Developing Key Competencies at School in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities for Policy (2012). http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/145EN.pdf. Accessed 17 March 2013
  7. 7.
    Wood, D., Brunet, J., Ross, G.: The role of tutoring in problem solving. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Disciplines 17, 89–100 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in society: the development of higher mental processes. In: Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., Soubeman, E. (eds.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coffield, F.: Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferguson, R.: The state of learning analytics in 2012: a review and future challenges. Technical report KMI-12-01, Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, UK (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ali, L., Hatala, M., Gašević, D., Jovanović, E.: A qualitative evaluation of evolution of a learning analytics tool. Comput. Educ. 58(1), 470–489 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dawson, S., Bakharia, A., Heathcate, E.: SNAPP: realising the affordance of real-time SNA within networked learning. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning, Aalborg, Denmark, pp. 125–133 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    The JRC Scientific and Technical Report Born Digital/Grown Digital: Assessing the Future Competitiveness of the EU Video Games Software Industry, EUR 24555 En-2010Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buckingham Shum, S., Ferguson, R.: Social learning analytics. Educ. Technol. Soc. 15(3), 3–26 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garris, R., Ahlers, R., Driskell, J.E.: Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model. Simul. Gaming 33, 441–467 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Panzoli, D., Qureshi, A., Dunwell, I., Petridis, P., de Freitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G.: Levels of interaction (LoI): a model for scaffolding learner engagement in an immersive environment. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6095, pp. 393–395. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    de Freitas, S.: Game for change. Nature 470(7334), 330–331 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mautone, P.D., Spiker, V.A., Karp, M.R.: Using serious game technology to improve aircrew training. In: Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (IITSEC) (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McGonigal, J.: Reality is Broken: Why Games Make us Better and How They can Change the World. Jonathan Cape, London (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Knight, J., Carly, S., Tregunna, B., Jarvis, S., Smithies, R., de Freitas, S., Mackway-Jones, K., Dunwell, I.: Serious gaming technology in major incident triage training: a pragmatic controlled trial. Resuscitation J. 81(9), 1174–1179 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kato, P.M., Cole, S.W., et al.: A video game improves behavioral outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 122(2), 305–317 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Avramides, K., de Freitas, S., Memarzia, K.: Societal impact of a serious game on raising public awareness: the case of FloodSim. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 15–22 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Arnab, S., Brown, K., Clarke, S., Dunwell, I., Lim, T., Suttie, N., Louchart, S., Hendrix, M., de Freitas, S.: The development approach of a pedagogically-driven serious game to support relationship and sex education (RSE) within a classroom setting. Comput. Educ. 69, 15–30 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Davenport, T.H.: Competing on analytics. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(1), 98–107 (2008)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peters, V.A.M., Vissers, G.A.N.: A simple classification model for debriefing simulation games. Simul. Gaming 35(1), 70–84 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shute, V.J.: Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. In: Tobias, S., Fletcher, J.D. (eds.) Computer Games and Instruction, pp. 503–523. Information Age Publishers, Charlotte (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kiili, K., de Freitas, S., Arnab, S., Lainema, T.: The design principles for flow experience in educational games. Procedia Comput. Sci. 15, 78–91 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., Means, B.: Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: An Issue Brief, pp. 1–57. Office of Educational Technology, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC (2012)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Serrano-Laguna, Á., Marchiori, E.J., et al.: A framework to improve evaluation in educational games. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Marrakesh, Morocco, April 2011Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Keim, D.A., Andrienko, G., Fekete, J.-D., Görg, C., Kohlhammer, J., Melançon, G.: Visual analytics: definition, process, and challenges. In: Kerren, A., Stasko, J.T., Fekete, J.-D., North, C. (eds.) Information Visualization. LNCS, vol. 4950, pp. 154–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Whitton, N.: Game engagement theory and adult learning. Simul. Gaming 42(5), 596–609 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74(1), 59–109 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lim, T., Louchart, S., Suttie, N., Ritchie, J.M., Aylett, R.S., Stănescu, I.A., Roceanu, I., Martinez-Ortiz, I., Moreno-Ger, P.: Strategies for effective digital games development and implementation. In: Baek, Y., Whitton, N. (eds.) Cases on Digital Game-Based Learning: Methods, Models, and Strategies, pp. 168–198. IGI Global, Hershey (2012). doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2848-9.ch010 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., Primavera, L.: Adaptive experience engine for serious games. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 1(4), 264–280 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brown, M.: Learning Analytics: Moving from Concept to Practice. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative Briefing (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvester Arnab
    • 1
  • Pablo Moreno Ger
    • 2
  • Theodore Lim
    • 3
  • Petros Lameras
    • 4
  • Maurice Hendrix
    • 5
  • Kristian Kiili
    • 6
  • Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge
    • 7
  • Manuel Ninaus
    • 8
  • Sara de Freitas
    • 9
  • Alessandro Mazzetti
    • 10
  • Anders Dahlbom
    • 11
  • Cristiana Degano
    • 10
  • Ioana Stanescu
    • 12
  • Maria Riveiro
    • 11
  1. 1.Disruptive Media Learning LabCoventry UniversityCoventryUK
  2. 2.Universidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.Herriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghUK
  4. 4.Serious Games InstituteCoventry UniversityCoventryUK
  5. 5.School of Science and TechnologyUniversity of NorthamptonNorthamptonUK
  6. 6.Tampere University of TechnologyPoriFinland
  7. 7.Bremer Institut für Produktion und LogistikBremenGermany
  8. 8.University of GrazGrazAustria
  9. 9.Curtin UniversityBentleyAustralia
  10. 10.Gruppo SIGLA S.r.lGenoaItaly
  11. 11.Högskolan i SkövdeSkövdeSweden
  12. 12.“Carol I” National Defence UniversityBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations