Advertisement

To Facilitate or Not? Understanding the Role of the Teacher in Using a Serious Game

  • Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge
  • Theodore Lim
  • James Ritchie
  • Matthias Kalverkamp
  • Francesco Bellotti
  • Claudia Ribeiro
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9221)

Abstract

The challenge of delivering personalized learning experiences in a large class, and through groups or teams, is an undertaking fraught with difficulties. Yet it is a necessary experience for engineering education since engineering in the real world are team-based events that build from individual knowledge. This paper reports on the learning of supply chain management (SCM), a fundamental component in engineering manufacturing operations and logistics planning. The study investigates the use of SHORTFALL a team-based game in conjunction with various degrees of facilitation, supported with taught material. Early results from two separate and independent studies indicate that the usefulness of using SHORTFALL in classes regarding the students’ experience and learning outcomes depends on the prior knowledge of the students as well as on the use of an expert facilitator.

Keywords

Supply Chain Supply Chain Management Game Play Master Student System Usability Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been co-funded by the EU under the FP7, in the Games and Learning Alliance (GALA) Network of Excellence, Grant Agreement nr. 258169.

References

  1. 1.
    Starkey, K., Tempest, S.: The future of the business school: knowledge challenges and opportunities. Hum. Relat. 58(1), 61–82 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prensky, M.: Digital game-based learning. ACM Comput. Entertain. 1(1), 21 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gee, J.P.: What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ebner, M., Holzinger, A.: Successful implementation of user-centered game based learning in higher education: an example from civil engineering. Comput. Educ. 49(3), 873–890 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A.: designing effective serious games: opportunities and challenges for research, special issue: creative learning with serious games. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (IJET) 5, 22–35 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greitzer, F.L., Kuchar, O.A., Huston, K.: Cognitive science implications for enhancing training effectiveness in a serious gaming context. ACM J. Educ. Res. Comput. 7(3–2), 10 (2007). doi: 10.1145/1281320.1281322 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Gloria, A., Bellotti, F., Berta, R.: Building a Comprehensive R&D Community on Serious Games, 4th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications, VS-Games 2012, Genova (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kerns, S.E., Miller, R.K., Kerns, D.V.: Designing from a blank slate: the development of the initial Olin college curriculum, in Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the new century (2005). http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11338.html. Accessed 20 December 2012
  9. 9.
    Cheville, A., Bunting, C.: Engineering students for 21st century: student development through the curriculum. J. Adv. Eng. Educ. 3(4), 1–37 (2011). http://advances.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/vol02/issue04/papers/aee-vol02-issue04-p10.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2014Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Sullivan, B., Rolstadås, A., Filos, E.: Global education in manufacturing strategy. Intellect. Manuf. 22, 663–674 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D.: Education for Next Generation Manufacturing, Paper presented at IMS Vision Forum 2006 (2007). ftp://cordis.europa.eu/_/gc_to_ims-visionforum2006-paper.pdf
  12. 12.
    Baalsrud Hauge, J., Hoeborn, G., Bredtmann, J.: Challenges of serious games for improving students’ management skills on decision making, handbook of research on serious games as educational, business and research tools: development and design. In: Cruz-Cunha, M., Varajao, J. (eds.) IGI Global, pp. 947–964 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Narayanasamy, V., Wong, K.W., Fung, C.C., Rai, S.: Distinguishing games and simulation games from simulators. Comput. Entertain. 4(2), 1–18 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kriz, W.: How to facilitate the debrief of simulations/games for effective learning. In: Psychologische Bericht (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simon, H.A.: Models of bounded rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sterman, J.D.: Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Manag. Sci. 35(3), 321–339 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Semini, M. Fauske, H. Strandhagen, J.O.: Simulation methods and educational games: application areas for learning asd strategic decision-making in manufacturing operations. In: Conference Proceedings, Multidisciplinary Research on Simulation Methods and Educational games in Industrial Management, SINTEF, S3771, Trondheim Norway (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baalsrud Hauge, J., Bellotti, F., Nadolski, R., Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Berta, R., Carvalho, M.: Deploying serious games for management in higher education: lessons learned and good practices. In: Escudeiro, P., de Carvalho, C.V. (eds.) Proceedings of 7th European Conference on Games based Learning, pp. 225–234, 2–3 October 2013, Porto (2013). ISBN: 978-1-909507-66-1Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Freitas, S., Kiili, K., Ney, M., Ott, M., Popescu, M., Romero, M., Stanescu, I.: Gel: exploring game enhanced learning. Procedia Comput. Sci. 15, 289–292 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Micael, D., Chen, S.: Serious Games: games that educate, train and inform. Thomson Course Technology (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hanghøj, T., Engel, B.C.: Teacher roles and positionings in relation to educational games. In: Meyer, B. (ed.) ECGBL 2010, pp. 115–122. Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, Reading (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Young, F., Slota, S., Cutter, B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., Simeoni, Z., Tran, M., Yukhymenko, M.: Our princess is in another castle: a review of trends in serious gaming for education. Rev. Educ. Res. 82(1), 61–89 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jonassen, D.H.: Certainty, determinism, and predictability in theories of instructional design: lessons from science. Educ. Techn. 37(1), 27–34 (1997)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bellotti, F., Kapralos, B., Lee, K., Moreno-Ger, P., Berta, R.: Assessment in and of serious games: an overview. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2013, 11 (2013). doi: 10.1155/2013/136864. Article ID: 136864Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Campbell, A., Gontzel, J., Savelsbergh, M.: Experiences with the use of supply chain software in education. Prod. Oper. Manag. 9(1), 66–80 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lewis, M.A., Maylor, H.R.: Game playing and operations management education. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 105(2007), 134–149 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Forrester, J.W.: Industrial Dynamics. a major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Bus. Rev. 36(4), 37–66 (1958)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nienhaus, J., Ziegenbein, A., Schoensleben, P.: How human behaviour amplifies the bullwhip effect. a study based on the beer distribution game online. Prod. Plann. Control 17(6), 547–557 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    eBeer. The electronic Beer game. http://www.responsive.net/ebeer.html
  30. 30.
    Wu, D.Y., Katok, E.: Learning, communication, and the bullwhip effect. J. Oper. Manag. 24(6), 839–850 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Macdonald, J.R., Frommer, I.D., Karaesmen, I.Z.: Decision making in the beer game and supply chain performance. Oper. Manag. Res. 6(3–4), 119–126 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Holweg, M., Bicheno, J.: Supply chain simulation – a tool for education, enhancement and endeavour. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 78, 163–175 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bodner, D.A., Wade, J.P., Watson, W.R., Kamberov, G.I.: Designing an experiential learning environment for logistics and systems engineering. Procedia Comput. Sci. 16, 1082–1091 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhou, L., Xie, Y., Wild, N., Hunt, C.: Learning and practising supply chain management strategies from a business simulation game: a comprehensive supply chain simulation. In: 2008 Proceedings of IEEE Simulation Conference on WSC 2008, pp. 2534–2542 (2008)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Louchart, S., Lim, T., Al Sulaiman, H.: Why are video-games relevant test beds for studying interactivity for engineers? In: Proceedings of International Simulation and Gaming Association Conference paper O-25, vol. 4, Singapore (2009)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Corriere, J.D.: Shortfall: An Educational Game on Environmental Issues in Supply Chain Management. M.S. thesis. Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. Northeastern University, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brooke, J.: SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, I.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor and Francis, Brighton (1996)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gennett, Z.: Shortfall Online: The Development of an Educational Computer Game for Teaching Sustainable Engineering to Millennial Generation Students. MS thesis, Department Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. Northeastern University, Boston (2010)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M.B., Bellotti, F., de Freitas, S., Louchart, S., Suttie, N., Berta, R., De Gloria, A.: Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. Br. J. Educ. Technol. (2013). doi: 10.1111/bjet.12113. (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge
    • 1
  • Theodore Lim
    • 2
  • James Ritchie
    • 2
  • Matthias Kalverkamp
    • 1
  • Francesco Bellotti
    • 3
  • Claudia Ribeiro
    • 4
  1. 1.Bremer Institut für Produktion und LogistikBremenGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Mechanical, Process and Energy Engineering, School of Engineering and Physical SciencesHerriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghUK
  3. 3.DITEN – University of GenoaGenoaItaly
  4. 4.INESC-ID, Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversidade Técnica de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations