Advertisement

Behavioural Validation of the ADACOR2 Self-organized Holonic Multi-agent Manufacturing System

  • José Barbosa
  • Paulo Leitão
  • Emmanuel Adam
  • Damien Trentesaux
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9266)

Abstract

Global economy is driving manufacturing companies into a paradigm revolution. Highly customizable products at lower prices and with higher quality are among the most imposed influence factors. To respond properly to these external and internal constraints, such as work absence and machine failures, companies must be in a constant adaptation phase. Several manufacturing control architectures have been proposed throughout the years displaying more or less success to adapt into different manufacturing situations. These architectures follow different design paradigms but recently the decentralization and distribution of the processing power into a set of cooperating and collaborative entities is becoming the trend. Despite of the effort spent, there is still the need to empower those architectures with evolutionary capabilities and self-organization mechanisms to enable the constant adaption to disturbances. This paper presents a behavioural mechanism embed in the ADACOR2 holons. A validation procedure for this mechanism is also presented and results extracted. This validation is achieved through the use of a benchmark and results are compared with classical hierarchical and heterarchical architectures as also with the ADACOR.

Keywords

Behavioural self-organization Multi-agent systems Reconfigurable manufacturing control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ElMaraghy, H., AlGeddawy, T., Azab, A., ElMaraghy, W.: Change in Manufacturing – Research and Industrial Challenges. In: Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability, pp. 2–9 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee, E.A., Seshia, S.A.: Introduction to embedded systems: a cyber physical systems approach, 1. ed., print. 1.08. Lulu: LeeSeshia.org (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Evans, P.C., Annunziata, M.: Industrial Internet: Pushing the Boundaries of Minds and Machines (2012). Whitepaper, General Electric, http://www.ge.com/docs/chapters/Industrial_Internet.pdf
  4. 4.
    Brussel, H.V., Wyns, J., Valckenaers, P., Bongaerts, L., Peeters, P.: Reference Architecture for Holonic Manufacturing Systems: PROSA. In: Computers in Industry, pp. 255–274 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leitão, P., Restivo, F.: ADACOR: A Holonic Architecture for Agile and Adaptive Manufacturing Control. Computers in Industry 57(2), 121–130 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Valckenaers, H.P., Kollingbaum, M., Van Brussel, H.: Multi-agent Coordination and Control using Stimergy. Computers in Industry 53, 75–96 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bussmann, S., Schild, K.: Self-Organizing Manufacturing Control: An Industrial Application of Agent Technology. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS-2000), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 87–94 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barbosa, J., Leitão, P., Adam, E., Trentesaux, D.: Dynamic self-organization in holonic multi-agent manufacturing systems: The ADACOR evolution. Computers in Industry 66, 99–111 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barbosa, J., Leitao, P., Adam, E., Trentesaux, D.: Self-Organized Holonic Multi-agent Manufacturing System: The Behavioural Perspective. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 3829–3834 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barbosa, J., Leitão, P., Adam, E., Trentesaux, D.: Structural Self-organized Holonic Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systems. In: Mařík, V., Lastra, J.L., Skobelev, P. (eds.) HoloMAS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8062, pp. 59–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barbosa, J., Leitão, P., Adam, E., Trentesaux, D.: Nervousness in Dynamic Self-organized Holonic Multi-agent Systems. In: Highlights on Pratical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 9–17 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hagelbäck, J., Johansson, S.J.: A Multiagent Potential Field-Based Bot for Real-Time Strategy Games. International Journal of Computer Games Technology 2009, 1–10 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dolgov, D., Thrun, S., Montemerlo, M., Diebel, J.: Path Planning for Autonomous Vehicles in Unknown Semi-structured Environments. The International Journal of Robotics Research 29(5), 485–501 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zbib, N., Pach, C., Sallez, Y., Trentesaux, D.: Heterarchical production control in manufacturing systems using the potential fields concept. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Engelmore, R., Morgan, A.J. (eds.) Blackboard systems. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, England; Reading, Mass (1988)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trentesaux, D., Pach, C., Bekrar, A., Sallez, Y., Berger, T., Bonte, T., Leitão, P., Barbosa, J.: Benchmarking flexible job-shop scheduling and control systems. Control Engineering Practice 21(9), 1204–1225 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Barbosa
    • 1
    • 3
  • Paulo Leitão
    • 1
    • 2
  • Emmanuel Adam
    • 3
  • Damien Trentesaux
    • 3
  1. 1.Polytechnic Institute of BragançaBragançaPortugal
  2. 2.LIACC - Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science LaboratoryPortoPortugal
  3. 3.LAMIH UMR CNRS 8201, UVHCValenciennes cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations