APMS 2015: Advances in Production Management Systems: Innovative Production Management Towards Sustainable Growth pp 74-81 | Cite as
Decomposing Packaged Services Towards Configurable Smart Manufacturing Systems
Abstract
Smart Manufacturing Systems have the ability to adapt to rapidly changing requirements. Software components of the manufacturing system—services under Service Oriented Architecture—must be configured dynamically to meet such requirements. Currently, software vendors provide packaged services, so they are not easily reconfigurable. Thus, engineers or production managers face difficulty in composing services with the appropriate functionality and quality. The objective of this paper is to discuss high-level requirements for such a unit service concept and provide an initial use case to illustrate how the unit service concept may apply new technologies to improve service. We propose a decomposition of target service according to standard model, and we claim the limitations of decomposed unit services, and new technologies and opportunities for each decomposed services.
Keywords
Manufacturing service Smart manufacturing Production planningNotes
Acknowledgement
This work was partly supported by the ICT R&D program of MSIP/IITP [B0101-15-0650, Development of Smart Manufacturing Operation Platform for Hightech Industry].
References
- 1.Jung, K., Morris, K.C., Lyons, K.W., Leong, S., Cho, H.: Mapping strategic goals and operational performance metrics for smart manufacturing systems. Procedia Comput. Sci. 44, 184–193 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.National Institute of Standards and Technology: Workshop report on foundations for innovation in cyber-physical systems. http://www.nist.gov/el/upload/CPS-WorkshopReport-1-30-13-Final.pdf. Jan 2013
- 3.ANSI/ISA-95: ANSI/ISA-95.00.01-2010, Enterprise-Control System Integration, Part 1: Models and Terminology (2010)Google Scholar
- 4.Lanza, G., Stricker, N., Peters, S.: Ad-hoc rescheduling and innovative business models for shock- robust production systems. Procedia CIRP 7, 121–126 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Lee, J., Lapira, E., Bagheri, B., Kao, H.A.: Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment. Manufact. Lett. 1(1), 38–41 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.mfglet.2013.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cowling, P., Johansson, M.: Using real time information for effective dynamic scheduling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 139(2), 230–244 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00355-1 MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Dong, Y.-H., Jang, J.: Production rescheduling for machine breakdown at a job shop. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50(10), 2681–2691 (2012). doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.579637 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Katragjini, K., Vallada, E., Ruiz, R.: Flow shop rescheduling under different types of disruption. Int. J. Prod. Res. 1–18 (2012). doi: 10.1080/00207543.2012.666856. Apr 2015
- 9.Hashemian, H.M., Bean, W.C.: State-of-the-art predictive maintenance techniques. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 60(10), 3480–3492 (2011). doi: 10.1109/TIM.2009.2036347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar