Advertisement

Visualization of Interactions Between Product and Service Lifecycle Management

  • Ingo Westphal
  • Mike Freitag
  • Klaus-Dieter Thoben
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 460)

Abstract

The adoption of advanced manufacturing intelligence technologies offers opportunities for new profitable business models. The basis for this is the data that is related to the manufactured product, the physical components used for the manufacturing and the services that are applied in this context. In such a Product-Service System (PSS) there are several interactions and corresponding dependencies between physical products and services that have to be managed to obtain an optimal added value from the PSS. A first step is to make the informational interactions between Product and Service Lifecycle Management (PLM and SLM) transparent and visualize them. The objective of this paper is therefore to identify and visualize the interactions between SLM and PLM in general and as a subsequent step in a use case of a manufacturing enterprise.

Keywords

Product service systems Lifecycle management Service science Service engineering Servitization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been partly funded by the European Commission through the FoF-ICT Project MSEE: Manufacturing Service Ecosystem (No. 284860) and PSYMBIOSYS (No. 636804). The authors wish to acknowledge the Commission and all the project partners for their contribution.

References

  1. 1.
    Wiesner, S., Freitag, M., Westphal, I., Thoben, K.-D.: Interactions between service and product lifecycle management. In Proceedings of the 7th CIRP Industrial Product-Service Systems (IPS2) Conference, St. Etienne, France (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thoben, K-D., Eschenbächer, J., Jagdev, H.: Extended products: evolving traditional product concepts. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, Bremen, 27–29 June 2001Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meier, I.H.: Hybride Leistungsbündel–ein neues Produktverständnis. In: Meier, H., Uhlmann, E. (eds.) Integrierte Industrielle Sach-und Dienstleistungen, pp. 1–21. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goedkoop, M.J., van Halen, C.J.G., te Riele, H.R.M., Rommens, P.J.M.: Product service systems, ecological and economic basics (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mont, O.K.: Clarifying the concept of product–service system. J. Clean. Prod. 10(3), 237–245 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vandermerwe, S., Rada, J.: Servitization of business: adding value by adding services. Eur. Manag. J. 6, 314–324 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wiesner, S., Guglielmina, C., Gusmeroli, S., Dougmeingts, G. (eds.): Manufacturing Service Ecosystem. Mainz Verlag, Aachen (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spohrer, J., Maglio, P.: Toward a science of service systems. In: Kieliszewski, C., Maglio, P., Spohrer, J. (eds.) Handbook of Service Science. Springer, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freitag M.: Konfigurierbares Vorgehensmodell für die exportorientierte Entwicklung von technischen Dienstleistungen. Dissertation, Fraunhofer Verlag, Stuttgart (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tukker, A.: Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Bus. Strategy Environ. 13(4), 246–260 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Freitag, M., Ganz, W.: InnoScore® service. Evaluating innovation for product-related services. In: Service Research and Innovation Institute (eds): Annual SRII global conference (SRII) San Jose, California, USA, Proceedings, pp. 214–221. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spath, D., Fähnrich, K.-P., Freitag, M., Meyer, K.: Service Engineering internationaler Dienstleistungen. Fraunhofer Verlag, Stuttgart (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levitt, T.: Exploit the product life cycle. http://hbr.org/1965/11/exploit-the-productlifecycle/ar/1
  14. 14.
    Ranasinghe, D.C., Harrison, M., Främling, K., McFarlane, D.: Enabling through life product-instance management: Solutions and challenges. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 34(3), 1015–1031 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kiritsis, D.: Closed-loop PLM for intelligent products in the era of the internet of things. Comput. Aided Des. 43(5), 479–501 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stark, J.: Product Lifecycle Management: 21st Century Paradigm for Product Realisation. Springer, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hong-Bae, J., Kiritsis, D., Xirouchakis, P.: Research Issues on closed-loop PLM. Comput. Ind. 58(8–9), 855–868 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Freitag, M.: Service Engineering and Lifecycle Management for IT-Services. In: Wiesner, S., Guglielmina, C., Gusmeroli, S., Dougmeingts, G. (eds.) Manufacturing Service Ecosystem, pp. 33–40. Mainz Verlag, Aachen (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Becker, M., Klingner, S.: Formale Modellierung von Komponenten und Abhängigkeiten zur Konfiguration von Product-Service-Systems. In: Thomas, O., Nüttgens, M. (eds.) Dienstleistungsmodellierung 2012 - Product-Service Systems und Produktivität. Springer, Wiesbaden (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baines, T.S., Lightfoot, H.W., Evans, S., Neely, A., Greenough, R., Peppard, J., Roy, R., Shehab, E., Braganza, A., Tiwari, A., Alcock, J.R., Angus, J.P., Bastl, M., Cousens, A., Irving, P., Johnson, M., Kingston, J., Lockett, H., Martinez, V., Michele, P., Tranfield, D., Walton, I.M., Wilson, H.: State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 221(10), 1543–1552 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andersen, J.B., McAloone, T.C., Garcia i Mateu, A., Mougaard, K., Neugebauer, L., Hsuan, J., Ahm, T.: PSS Business Models -A workbook in the PROTEUS Series. Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kongens Lyngby (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weber, F.: Formale Interaktionsanalyse: Ein Beitrag zur systematischen Gestaltung von Informations- und Kommunikationsstrukturen im Concurrent Enterprise durch die Berücksichtigung von Informationseigenschaften. Universität Bremen (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eppinger, S.: Managing complex system development projects. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingo Westphal
    • 1
  • Mike Freitag
    • 2
  • Klaus-Dieter Thoben
    • 1
  1. 1.BIBA – Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH at the University of BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Institut für Arbeitswirtschaft und OrganisationStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations