Advertisement

Challenges for Requirements Engineering of Cyber-Physical Systems in Distributed Environments

  • Stefan WiesnerEmail author
  • Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge
  • Klaus-Dieter Thoben
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 460)

Abstract

Engineering of systems is highly influenced by rapid technological changes, such as the emergence of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS). These are interconnected embedded systems enabled by human-machine interaction. Realisation of CPS require a collaboration between mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, and computer science since different components are delivered and developed by different disciplines. Consequently, the Requirements Engineering (RE) process needs to consider multi-disciplinary perspectives. The objective of this paper is to elaborate the specific challenges of RE for CPS in a distributed environment and to identify knowledge sources and targets in CPS engineering. It describes the relevant types of knowledge and defines appropriate exchange mechanisms and standards.

Keywords

Requirements engineering Cyber-physical systems Collaborative network 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been partly funded by the European Commission through the FoF-RIA Project PSYMBIOSYS: Product-Service sYMBIOtic SYStems (No. 636804). The authors wish to acknowledge the Commission and all the PSYMBIOSYS project partners for their contribution.

References

  1. 1.
    Reichwald, R., Piller, F., Ihl, C.: Interaktive Wertschöpfung: Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung, 2nd edn. Gabler Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D’Aveni, R.A., Dagnino, G.B., Smith, K.G.: The age of temporary advantage. Strat. Mgmt. J. 31, 1371–1385 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hintsa, J., Uronen, K.: Cassandra D1.1 - FINAL - CompendiumGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Follett, J.: Designing for Emerging Technologies. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., Wahlster, W.: Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0: Deutschlands Zukunft als Produktionsstandort sichern; Abschlussbericht des Arbeitskreises Industrie 4.0, Forschungsunion; Geschäftsstelle der Plattform Industrie 4.0, Berlin, Frankfurt/Main (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smart Manufacturing Leadership Coalition, Implementing 21st Century Smart Manufacturing. Workshop Summary Report, Washington, D.C. (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baheti, R., Gill, H.: Cyber-physical systems. In: The Impact of Control Technology, pp. 161–166 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., Park, J.: Open innovation in SMEs—an intermediated network model. Res. Policy 39, 290–300 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang, W., Yan, W., Chen, C.-H.: Customer requirements elicitation and management for product conceptualization. In: Stjepandić, J., Rock, G., Bil, C. (eds.) Concurrent Engineering Approaches for Sustainable Product Development in a Multi-Disciplinary Environment, pp. 957–968. Springer, London (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kossiakoff, A.: Systems engineering principles and practice, 2nd edn. Wiley, Oxford (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rouse, W.B., Sage, A.P.: Handbook of systems engineering and management, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elgh, F.: Modelling and management of manufacturing requirements in design automation systems. In: Loureiro, G., Curran, R. (eds.) Complex Systems Concurrent Engineering, pp. 321–328. Springer, London (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nilsson, P., Fagerström, B.: Managing stakeholder requirements in a product modelling system. Comput. Ind. 57, 167–177 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alter, S.: Metamodel for service analysis and design based on an operational view of service and service systems. Serv. Sci. 4, 218–235 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blanchard, B.S.: System Engineering Management, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hauksdóttir, D., Mortensen, N.H., Nielsen, P.E.: Identification of a reusable requirements structure for embedded products in a dynamic market environment. Comput. Ind. 64, 351–362 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hull, E., Jackson, K., Dick, J.: Requirements Engineering, 2nd edn. Springer, London (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., Linkman, S.: Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51, 7–15 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: Promoting relevance in IS research: an informing system for design science research, informing science. Int. J. Emerg. Transdiscipline 125–138Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.: Strategies for design science research evaluation. In: Proceedings of ECIS 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35, 37–56 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Geisberger, E., Broy, M.: agendaCPS: Integrierte Forschungsagenda Cyber-Physical Systems. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wiesner, S., Gorldt, C., Soeken, M., Thoben, K.-D., Drechsler, R.: Requirements engineering for cyber-physical systems. In: Grabot, B., Vallespir, B., Gomes, S., Bouras, A., Kiritsis, D. (eds.) Advances in Production Management Systems. IFIP AICT, vol. 438, pp. 281–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Penzenstadler, B., Eckhardt, J.: A requirements engineering content model for cyber-physical systems. In: IEEE Second Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Systems, Services and Systems-of-Systems (RES4), pp. 20–29, Chicago, IL, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ncube, C.: On the engineering of systems of systems: key challenges for the requirements engineering community. In: Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Systems, Services and Systems-of-Systems (RES4), pp. 70–73, Trento, Italy, (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schätz, B.: The role of models in engineering of cyber-physical systems‐challenges and possibilities. In: Tagungsband des Dagstuhl-Workshops, p. 91 (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Broy, M., Cengarle, M.V., Geisberger, E.: Cyber-physical systems: imminent challenges. In: Calinescu, R., Garlan, D. (eds.) Monterey Workshop 2012. LNCS, vol. 7539, pp. 1–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Wiesner
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge
    • 1
    • 2
  • Klaus-Dieter Thoben
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH at the University of BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Production EngineeringUniversity of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations